tattooe is a sign of slavery

Philippines
June 17, 2008 9:43am CST
do you agree??
4 responses
@SwtJenlove (1090)
• United States
17 Jun 08
no, tattoos are a sign of individuality. you have a "choice" weather or not to get a tattoo. slavery, you had no choice.
• Philippines
17 Jun 08
Biblically speaking, yes. But yah it' a choice, thanks for your comment
• United States
17 Jun 08
no problem :)
• United States
17 Jun 08
It used to be, in the past, that tattoos meant something like that you've mentioned or an affiliation with an outlaw group. Now, however, they are more just individual artistic expressions on a person's body. In some parts of the world, they still have a negative view, but where I live, they're mostly just an art form. I wouldn't have one because it's partly against my religion and I don't want anything permanent because I get tired of things pretty easily.
• Philippines
17 Jun 08
We have same the reason why I choose not to have tattoos. I like what you said " I get tired of things easily" I am too:)
• United States
17 Jun 08
Nope.
@mentalward (14691)
• United States
20 Jun 08
Tattoos are simply an artistic expression today. It has nothing to do with slavery, as it did long ago. I will not have a tattoo because I've seen too many people regret it later. I saw a TV show about circus performers and they interviewed a "tattooed lady" who was tattooed from head to foot. She was up in years, and her tattoos were, well, kinda saggy. Nope, no tattoos for me!