Another Conservative Against McCain!

@Bd200789 (2994)
United States
October 14, 2008 6:50pm CST
This time it is Christopher Buckley, the son of William F. Buckley, founder of the ational Review. He says, "John McCain has changed. He said, famously, apropos the Republican debacle post-1994, “We came to Washington to change it, and Washington changed us.” This campaign has changed John McCain. It has made him inauthentic". What do you think? Here's the link to the article. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-10/the-conservative-case-for-obama
2 people like this
5 responses
@evanslf (484)
15 Oct 08
Well McCain has changed but I also think he hasn't as well. Confusing? Let me explain. I think McCain is at heart a moderate, what Republicans would call a RHINO (indeed a number of Republican supporters are calling him just that on this site). I think he has little time for the religious right and he is more at home with his friends like Lieberman in the Senate. However, McCain ran on a moderate maverick platform back in 2000 and lost. What has happened this time is that McCain has reverted a number of his previous policy positions (was against now for the Bush 2001 tax cuts for instance, but there are numerous others) in order to make him more acceptable to the Republican base and secure the nomination. I suspect that he doesn't really believe in these new policy stances that he has taken and maybe that is why he doesn't come across as authentic. This strategy for the primaries worked but then normally in a general election, the nominees of both parties tend to tack back to the center where elections are won. But in McCain's case, he couldn't do that for if he moved too far to the center he would antagonise the Republican base. But on the other hand, failure to move to the center and distinguish himself from Bush would prove fatal with independents. And so McCain tried to do both, appeal to the right (ie Supreme Court judges, against abortion, nominate Palin) to energise the wary Republican base and with Palin in particular this worked to a considerable extent, but on the other hand try to appear moderate as well by opposing a number of Bush's policies publicly so he could appeal to the independents. This was always a high-wire balancing act and as the election has worn on, it has proved increasingly difficult to maintain, though he has also had some back luck with the economy because the people are blaming the Republicans for it and that is obvious hurting his poll ratings. The thing is that if McCain does win, he will be faced with the reality of a Dem House and Senate with large majorities. He will then be forced to compromise if he wants to get anything done and he will have to accept legislation which will make the Republican base mad. I suspect also that he'll have to compromise on the Supreme Court judges - if he nominates a right wing anti-abortion judge as he says, the Dem Senate will likely vote the nomination down. If he compromises on his judicial appointments, the Republican base will really go mad. In some ways, it might be better for the Republicans for McCain to lose because if he wins, I can easily see a scenario where the Republican party will tear itself apart as McCain is quite likely to revert back to his RHINO tendencies which he exhibited back in 2000.
1 person likes this
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
15 Oct 08
I'm not sure what to think about this anymore. I will just be glad when the election is done and overwith.
1 person likes this
@eaforeman6 (8979)
• United States
15 Oct 08
I would rather have Mcain for president. I do not think our country should be disarmed by Obama.. I dont think Obama has enough experience to lead. He should be investigated on his birth certificate, his 18 years of association with Aeyers and the other scandals too, such as the Sinclair scandal and the Acorn problems. This list is getting longer..
• United States
15 Oct 08
Bush had more experience before being President than both McCain and Obama--fat lot of good that did. Experience means nothing by itself--judgment is everything. And Obama has better judgment than McCain--if we had all listened to him, we would have caught Bin Laden by now instead of wasting our time invading a country that NEVER ATTACK US NOR WAS A THREAT TO US. His birth certificate is real. Don't fall for the smear: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (especially look at the "supporting documents"--the pictures there are very clear) Ayers? Obama was 8. Sinclair? Not even the nuttiest of nuts is still pushing those baseless claims of his. ACORN? Taking something as simple as some lazy/dishonest/greedy people bilking ACORN out of some money and pretending it's WIDESPREAD ORGANIZED VOTER FRAUD is complete nonsense. Just learn the difference between registration fraud and voter fraud, and one sees right through the smear: http://clarusvisum.blogspot.com/2008/10/so-what-this-acorn-thing-all-about.html Yawn. Same nonsense over and over. What about McCain's "old friend" G. Gordon Liddy? What about the Keating Five? What about the head of McCain's transition team having lobbied for Saddam Hussein? Conveniently ignored, I'm sure. But the facts are there.
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Oct 08
There will always be those who disagree with their party leaders, especially in a time of election. I'd like to see those who disagree with Obama and his policies, they might be hard to find since they all follow blindly the fresh face of the old democratic party.
15 Oct 08
Hi Bd200789, I don't really much about him but I just don't like the man. Tamara