You Agreed to the Terms and Conditions...
By pumpkinjam
@pumpkinjam (8876)
United Kingdom
November 6, 2008 5:09am CST
This is about a situation I have had recently (and previously) in which I incurred charges on an account because of something out of my control.
The recent thing was that someone stole from my account. Well, they tried but there was nothing there to steal. However, this meant that the bank charged me for not paying the money! I tried to explain the situation a few times only to be bombarded with responses of "you agreed to the terms and conditions", "we suggest you handle your account better".
Well, forgive me if I am wrong but I was under the impression that I was putting money into an account on the basis that I could trust them to look after it. I was also under the impression that, while there were Ts&Cs about charges, that there was nothing in them saying that the account holder was responsible for paying a charge incurred through theft.
I did get the charge reimbursed but they still will not admit that it should never have been made.
It is just so patronising to be told to "handle your account better", blah blah blah, etc. when you have handled your account perfectly well and those who are supposed to be looking after it have not done their job properly.
So, to make this into an actual discussion, have you had charges made through no fault of your own? What did you do and did you have a reasonable responce or did they insist is must be your own fault? And does anyone know why certain financial institutions treat their customers like idiots?
2 people like this
3 responses
@underdogtoo (9579)
• Philippines
6 Nov 08
I have heard it said that banks are the shrewdest businesses. This would point it out to be correct in this regard in that they just want to make money and service to their clients is merely secondary. Cheers!!
3 people like this
@pumpkinjam (8876)
• United Kingdom
7 Nov 08
I think you might be right. I suppose any large business puts profits before customers. Perhaps they'll learn once all their customers start going elsewhere. My particular one suggested I should handle accounts better in future so I will do that by taking them elsewhere!
@minx267 (15526)
• Hartford, Connecticut
7 Nov 08
Yea I had this happen -when some one tried to get "non-existant" funds from me through paypal. they warned me (I will give them that much) that they thought something was fishy with the transaction. But when i responded and told them that it was indeed -theft. they couldn't tell me whether or not they actually started the process of paying him or not- So I had to go to the bank- and it cost me $$ to put a stop payment on my account -Just in case.
1 person likes this
@pumpkinjam (8876)
• United Kingdom
7 Nov 08
My problem was similar ie someone stealing non existent money from a Pay Pal account. To be fair to Pay Pal, they immediately informed me that there was a problem and did what they could. I just then had the problem of explaining this to my building society who seemed to think it wasn't theft because they could see no problem with the transaction. It had already "gone" from my account so they charged me for an unpaid direct debit because they didn't seem to believe that it was fraudulent. That bothered me the most. I was telling the building society that the transaction was fraudulent and they basically accused me of lying and not handling my account properly with not one word of a hint that they might actually investigate to check on it.
@dorypanda (1601)
•
7 Nov 08
I know exactly how you feel. Yes, I've had 'charges on top of charges', which I believe is actually illegal, I complained to the building society in question and they just sent me a letter telling me I signed up knowing the terms and conditions of the account. The letter I had recently from them basically told me that they couldn't claim any money from me as the courts were looking into whether the charges (on all customers accounts, not just mine) were actually legal or not, now the way I see it is that if I HAD to pay back the charges anyway, then they're probably legal, however, as the charges are being investigated by the courts then they are probably not legal. I read somewhere (can't remember where though) that charges on top of charges had been deemed illegal and therefore I wouldn't have to pay them.
I have no idea why the financial institutions treat their customers like idiots, but I do know that the building society I'm with is losing customers because of problems such as yours and mine, hopefully ALL their customers will go elsewhere.
1 person likes this



