Local Jobs for Local People?

@p1kef1sh (45681)
January 31, 2009 7:51am CST
In the UK right now there is a huge fuss being made about the fact that an Italian company has been awarded a contract to work on a British oil refinery using Italian workers rather than recruiting local British ones. Britain is part of the European Union and we allegedly have a free trade system in place between member states that allows for all EU citizens to work unhindered in any member country that they wish. Now I have my views about whether Britain should be in the EU at all; however, we are and these are the laws. Should local people with the necessary skills be considered before others when employers seek staff?
8 people like this
24 responses
@nannacroc (4049)
31 Jan 09
Of course they should, with the amount of jobs being lost it isn't doing Britain any favours to give jobs to foreign workers before trying to recruit from the people who have lost their jobs. Britain used to be one of the best maufacturers in the world and quality goods were usually guaranteed. We now have no British owned manufacturing to speak of and the people losing their jobs should be the first to be offered any new ones. My fathers generation worked hard so that workers here could have a decent wage and god working conditions and foreign workers, albeit not many Italians so far, come and work insweat shaops for rubbish wages underming all the work put in by our forefathers from Watt Tyler onwards. AAAGGH you've made me angry.
@nannacroc (4049)
1 Feb 09
It has been eroded letter by letter.
1 person likes this
@nannacroc (4049)
2 Feb 09
They appear to be coming here and swallowing Britain whole.
1 person likes this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I wonder what happened to the "great" in Great Britain Nanna?
1 person likes this
• Regina, Saskatchewan
31 Jan 09
The simple answer is yes. The complicated answer is no. Yes, because it provides employment for the 'natives' of said country, which in turn boosts local economy. No, because language could be a problem, and also, the 'foreign' workers also need jobs and a have a home economy to support, and should be able to work for a company from their own country no matter where that job may take them. But then what do I know, I live in Canada where people are imported from Mexico to work at MacDonald's!
1 person likes this
• Regina, Saskatchewan
2 Feb 09
Like I said, ........... a complicated question. But I do see your point. Got me thinking actually of our own economy and I've come up with a brilliant idea to help it! LOL You'll have to wait for the discussion though!
1 person likes this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I agree with you to a large extent. However, this is a wholesale import of foreign workers, hundreds of them, without considering whether there is a local option available. More widely, I think that this is simply the entree to a year of discontent and militancy brought about by the recession.
2 people like this
@DonnaLawson (4032)
• United States
31 Jan 09
I believe it should be local first.. A community should work to support all of it's members and working the locals is a great step in making the community work.. It is the same way in the US, but we call it outsourcing, which is one of the stupidest things that our government has ever done.. We need to learn from the past and take care of our local workers, because if our locals aren't working, then God help you if you have a commodity to sell to them, they can't buy it.. Is there a hard and fast rule for government officials to be stupid, is it in the rule book..
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
My health is a victim to outsourcing and I know first hand more about it than I wish Donna! Curiously, I suspect that Italian labour laws are tighter than our own.
• United States
1 Feb 09
I never said they weren't idiots, I will always believe the country is run by a few greedy people and a few of their greedy friends.. I can't say much good about our government.. I would like to be proud of our elected officials but I can't..
• Japan
1 Feb 09
Well outsourcing was started by the Republicans. The same people who gave tax cuts to the rich thinking it would help them creat jobs. Well they did just not in the US .
1 person likes this
@Wizzywig (7847)
31 Jan 09
It depends on whether all the member states adopt the same policy. I suppose the UK may be falling into the 'positive discrimination' thing - they feel they have to put other nationalities first so they cant be accused of favouring their own citizens. If the Italian company are better or significantly cheaper I suppose it makes sense to use them but we have to consider the implications of the cost of a further rise in unemployment and all the impact that has on the economy. It would be interesting to find out how many other member states choose to use British companies over their own???
1 person likes this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I am always hearing about how the EU benefits Britain. But I see precious little evidence of it.
• United States
3 Feb 09
Since the law is what it is, I think the person most qualified should get the job.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
3 Feb 09
It is the law. That's true. But it the law always right? We are talking hundreds of jobs here, not just one or two.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
5 Feb 09
We haven't voted to join the EU either. We voted to join a common market, not to lose our sovereignty. But that's what's happening.
• United States
5 Feb 09
I understand your anger and frustration. We here in the USA have been trying for ages to stop illegal aliens from coming in and taking our jobs away from us and stop companies from outsourcing jobs overseas. The difference in our situation and yours is that we've not voted to join union with the rest of the America continent, but I'm afraid it's coming.
• United States
31 Jan 09
Dear Friend When it comes to job local residential peopal should be considered first.I think local people are more qualified than others.
1 person likes this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
My view is that if there are people qualified locally then they should be considered first. Thank you.
1 person likes this
@mtdewgurl74 (18151)
• United States
21 Feb 09
I feel that they should use the locals first before they bring in others. Maybe they did so because they charged less an hour? Maybe if they shoke up and peeped a bit they would stir up something and then they would be working instead?..passover my answer it is almost 5 in the morning and I should be in bed already..
@mtdewgurl74 (18151)
• United States
22 Feb 09
Bad Becky! Becky gets down on her knees (which you might have to help me back up)covers her head and takes deep breaths, patiently waits for her whipping for being so thoughtless...be gentle..
@p1kef1sh (45681)
21 Feb 09
I have only just got up and you're off to bed Becky - very late if I may say so! LOL. I agree with you about the workers. Unfortunately if out new borderless empire of Europe that stretches from Ireland to the border with Russia, we are not supposed to think such thoughts! Grrrrr.
1 person likes this
@pumpkinjam (8539)
• United Kingdom
1 Feb 09
I am in two minds actually. Particularly in our current economic climate when our own people are losing jobs and, in a lot of cases, being left in the cold (sometimes quite literally), it does seem rather unfair to allow foreign workers to take on Bristish jobs. If British people have the appropriate skills then they should at least be considered (I say British to mean anyone who is a legal citizen of the British Isles, regardless of race, ethnic origin, etc). However, the law is, as you say, that people are free to work in any EU country and, if the Italian company can do the job well, and probably for less, then who would blame the bosses for employing them instead. One problem I think is that foreign workers can AFFORD to work for less. British workers have to be paid no less than minimum wage and a lot of people, unfortunately, couldn't live on any less than that even if they wanted to. So, anyway, what was the question? I don't think we should get to the point of refusing to employ anyone who wasn't born in Britain or whatever but I do think that skills should be taken into account before anything else and, if a foreign company offers something cheaper then British companies should be given a chance to outbid them. And, again, the price should come after the skill.
• United Kingdom
2 Feb 09
Yes, it is very insensitive. Something I heard today had me riled. Someone on the radio was claiming that we shouldn't complain about "foreigners taking our jobs" because, apparently, British people don't want them! Now, I don't know about everybody else but if someone offered me a decent job, I wouldn't refuse!
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
There's an up and downside to most things Pumpkin. In this case though the wholesale importation of foreign workers, hundreds of them is a slap in the face for British workers with the same skills. I accept entirely that the EU allows us to work in any member state, but in this case it is extremely insensitive.
1 person likes this
• Canada
31 Jan 09
Yes, I think that local people should be hired for local jobs. Why ship a bunch of non-residents over, at the company's cost, therefore that extra cost is factored into the company's charge to the local population? It doesn't make sense to me. Unless, of course, those out of country workers are at such a lower wage, that it is cheaper for the company. But I can't see it working out that way.
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
4 Feb 09
I would think so.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
4 Feb 09
I would to.
1 person likes this
@GreenMoo (11834)
6 Feb 09
I've pondered over this for days, ever since it arrived in my inbox. Thanks for posing a question I can't answer P1kef1sh! As someone who particularly 'benefits' from the ease in which EU nationals may operate throughout the EU, I feel I should agree that EU employers should be able to employ workers from anywhere within the EU. However, that doesn't quite sit right with me and I can quite understand the reaction to the situation you quote. From a personal perspective, I've seen both sides. There are windmills being built locally to me which are using 'outside labour' and have created not entirely positive feedback as a result. On the other hand, many many of my neighbours work elsewhere in the EU for most of the year as they have specific skills due to the peculiarities of the local area and they can earn considerably more money elsewhere. I'm not sure what the solution is however. Perhaps local labour should be sought prior to looking further afield. Any company wishing to build a good relationship with the local community would probably do this anyway though, so I presume that the issues are primarily relating to skilled employees. No solutions from me, but it's got my brain working!
@p1kef1sh (45681)
6 Feb 09
I was quite interested to hear that more Brits work elsewhere in the EU than foreigners do in the UK. That doesn't seem like the position to me. Of course if you include the Armed Forces it will run into the tens of thousands. There is no simple answer. I don't have a gripe about workers coming here, but I do think when entire labour forces are in the pot then greater thought needs to be given.
@guybrush (4658)
• Australia
1 Feb 09
We are having similar problems in Australia, P1ke. One large company stated they were 'forced' to employ overseas labour because they could not hire Australians, even though they were paying generous salaries, etc. When investigated, it turned out this company was paying peanuts to the foreign workers - some of these were illegal immigrants - and these poor people were being housed in substandard dwellings with insufficient toilet and cleaning facilities. As usual, money seems to be the prime factor here - as it is with the second-grade grocery products brought in by greedy supermarket chains while our farmers plough their crops into the ground because they can't find buyers.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I am not a socialist Guy, but I am of the view that charity begins at home and such examples are simply corporate greed. We are all living though a recession caused by that!
@guybrush (4658)
• Australia
1 Feb 09
I very much agree. This will sound very harsh, but whenever there's an overseas disaster our government is quick to donate millions and millions (which they must pull conveniently out of their posteriors) - and yet you'd be horrified to read of the state of our hospitals, schools and the living conditions of our indigenous people. There has been much in the news lately of poor women having miscarriages in dirty hospital toilets because the staff is too overworked and understaffed to find beds and proper care for them - and this morning's paper had stories of doctors using their own money to buy supplies, and hospitals being denied credit at local businesses because of unpaid bills! In one hospital, patients' families were actually asked to bring meals! It sounds laughable - we're NOT a third world country (are we?) - and as well as this, the schools are rotting, leaking and infested with mildew and vermin. Some have to close when the weather heats up, as there's no air conditioning and nobody can work in the stifling conditions. Yet, we fling charity with gay abandon - probably in order to impress. Obviously it's nice to help other countries who are suffering, but the state of health, education and public housing in this country is absolutely appalling - yet the government keep telling us there's no money. Riggggghhhhht ...
31 Jan 09
Hi p1key, That just says it all really, I was never on for joining te EU but like you said we are and I think that everyone who has the necessary skills should employed including British workers, so why are they just employing Italian workers? I don't think that is fair. Hugs. Tamara xxxx
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
Well of course it's a free market Tamara, so anyone can work anywhere. But this can work against a country. We have always had a soft approach to immigration and now we are reaping the effects of those policies. XXX
1 person likes this
1 Feb 09
Hi p1key, Too true, have you seen the news? now the British workers are marching and about time too and lets hope this goverment stand up and listen. Hugs. Tamara xxxx
@jakill (835)
2 Feb 09
The facts of the matter are that the company put a new construction project out to tender according to EU rules, and they naturally will have selected the best tender for the company to get the work done economically and efficiently. The construction project is a huge one but it does not affect the people who already work in the core business. No one will lose their jobs over this. However, the British construction industry is in the doldrums and many workers in that sector have been laid off. It's a pity that no British company could submit an acceptable tender that would secure the work. It's also a pity if the tender process didn't include negotiations that might have made the successful bidding firm employ at least some British workers. But we have no way of knowing the details of the tender and its process. I also have to say that the rules work both ways. British people can also work in any EU country, and British companies are free to move their workers to projects in any EU country. I can understand how local people feel when they see the way things are going, but I'm not sure that wildcat strikes are going to change things. They can only do more harm to the economy.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
2 Feb 09
Yes. I accept and understand that. However, this isn't a small group of workers, this is a major contract employing hundreds with apparently no real consideration about whether there are the skills locally to meet work on offer. I don't think that wildcat strikes are very helpful. There is a cynical part of me that thinks that this is a handy peg to hang wider discontent on, not just this project.
@jakill (835)
2 Feb 09
I agree abut the strikes and the wider discontent. Tonight's news report said that even the unions are trying to persuade the workers to go back to work. It also said that a reason for accepting the Italian tender was that they have skilled workers who could start work immediately while British contenders would have to go through a process of recruiting and training staff before the work could begin. It all had to depend on who responded to the invitation to tender. British companies really need to get better at this. There would probably have been a number of ways to do it - forming a consortium might have made it work. But now it looks like a fait accomplit. If there's a light at the end of the tunnel, it's probably that there will be more jobs for locals once the construction has been completed.
@Bryony (36)
• India
1 Feb 09
NEWS like these are very good to hear and makes the citizens happy for sure! BUT... Does the Government make it happen at all? Even Obama said he is going to employ his country people on the first place does it mean outsourcing has stopped? My point is, I am happy with such kind of decisions only if they are going to be ever implemented!
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I'm not sure that it does make the citizens happy Bryony. But thank you anyway.
• India
1 Feb 09
Hmmm...I think a balance should be struck. :) You can't just give jobs to foreigners when there are highly qualified people at home. However, if there aren't any qualified people at home, why not get people from outside? I would say "home first." Cheers and happy Mylotting
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
I agree but unfortunately our membership of the EU means that we have to give the jobs to anyone who qualifies and is also a member of the EU. This will divide the pros and antis for sure.
2 Feb 09
i wont go over all the arguements already submitted, but when these companies trade, they always says they are coming in to the area, to give jobs to local people. so therefore these companies are reneging on their agreements with local planning authorities. apparently most of the building work being done on the 2012 olympics is also being done by foreign workers. which once again wasnt the agreement when the applications went in. i would hate to be thought of as a racist or anti european, but we do have a massive problem with people out of work at the moment. i am lucky i have a job, i have been in the job for 10 years, but prior to that i struggled to get a full time job. i ended up with 4 part time jobs and was working in excess of 48 hours a week. having said all that, i have neighbours who are polish. they have their own shop , both of them work in it and they work all the hours they can. even though its thick snow today they have gone off to work. what more can i say.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
2 Feb 09
Well I will come out here and say that I am anti europe. What I mean is the surrendering of our sovereignty to Brussels. Had I been old enough I would have voted for Britain's inclusion in the "Common Market". I am all for free trade. However, we have now become beholden to a federalised union that dictates so many things in our lives. That is something that we didn't vote for and has become a millstone around our necks. This contract is an excellent example of that. As for Poles etc. They do show us up with their strong work ethics. I was also amused to see how many are returning home because this isn't the land of milk and honey that they thought that it would be.
@mimico (3617)
• Philippines
1 Feb 09
Hmm you have a point but then you're part of a union. So technically, locals and non locals should be considered in the same manner. There shouldn't be a preference for one or the other. If the British oil refinery likes to hire Italian workers then that's their choice, right? At least they're not outsourcing work to China. :)
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
That's true and I agree that in principle that is what should happen. However, this is a major contract which will see locals claiming benefits whilst foreign workers take their jobs. It will be interesting to see the outcome.
@bhanusb (5709)
• India
2 Feb 09
But the question is this why UK government made such contract with Italy government or the Italian company.Your government should consider about own citizen's employment.I think only for this reason it will not be a wise decision for UK to quit Europian Union.I think Europe should remain united to face US aggressive attitude.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
2 Feb 09
The Governent has no option Bhansub. Britain is part of the European Union and all big contracts have to be offered to all member states.
• Japan
1 Feb 09
Well this is a problem that many countries face. If the economy was not bad it would not be an issue. The thing is is many cases companies can`t find local people to do certain jobs. So the import people to to do those jobs. When the economy goes south then people look for someone to point the finger at. In Korea you couldn`t get koreans to work 3D jobs. The imported people to do those jobs.But once the economy started to go back they complained that foreigners were taking all the jobs. On the other hand since England is a member of the EU they have to follow the agreements their leaders signed. The way to change it is to vote those people out of office. At the end of the day thought it`s probably cheaper to hire the Italian workers than British workers so the company is going to go with the cheaper workers.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Feb 09
Apparently it is not cheaper to hire Italians. I agree with yo about voting out our leaders, but the EU is so ingrained into our system now that leaving just isn't an option. More's the pity.