Is Michael Steel Conservative Agenda Republican Sensationalism?
By powermannx
@powermannx (450)
United States
February 3, 2009 11:19am CST
On the crest of President Barack Obama's nomination, the Republican Party nominate Michael Steel as the first African-American Chairman. Is this a move by the Republican Party to try a daunting move that will bring in African-Americans into their agenda? Can the Republican Party really believe that some African-Americans will change their party for a group of men and women who do not favor middle-class values?
2 people like this
5 responses
@tdemex (3540)
• United States
3 Feb 09
It's very clear he is a token negro for the right wingers! They never supported anything thing to do with any minorities! Now all of a sudden all these old white males have this great revelation and open their arms to the Blacks,Hispanics, and Asians! LOL! What a joke!!! They think we're all stupid! Now if your in the minority and RICH,that might perk them up and then they would only scoff you behind your back! It's all politics!!!
tdemex
tdemex@powermannx (450)
• United States
3 Feb 09
I agree with you on 99% of what you are saying, although there is that one percent of Republicans that believe he was not used as a token negro. Anyone that has lived in the United States has seen enormous changes that have happened in this nation, most of it was due to African-Americans willing to sacrifice most anything to obtain equal freedom for their people. On the other hand, if it were not for the many brave White-Americans who walked side-by-side with their sisters and brothers many freedoms that African-Americans have today would not exist. Thanks for leaving the comment.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Feb 09
"It's very clear he is a token negro for the right wingers! They never supported anything thing to do with any minorities!"
And that's just the kind of crap I'm used to hearing from liberals like you. Who, may I ask, are "they"? The civil rights movement started with republicans like Dwight Eisenhower. Who supported Brown v. Board of Education and proposed and signed 2 civil rights acts during his term. George W. Bush appointed Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice to the highest offices ever held by a black man and woman prior to Obama. They were also the most qualified people for those jobs so there was nothing "token" about their appointments.
"Now all of a sudden all these old white males have this great revelation and open their arms to the Blacks,Hispanics, and Asians! LOL! What a joke!!! They think we're all stupid!"
From the look of it, YOU are the old white male. There are plenty of Hispanics and Asians in the republican party. I didn't know the dems wanted to lay claim to those minorities as well, but I shouldn't be surprised.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Feb 09
David Duke? Are you kidding me? He is nothing in the republican party. That moron is a former clan leader and nobody in the GOP would want to be associated with him.
In case you're unaware, he was also a democrat when he ran for the senate and during his presidential campaign. When he ran as a Republican both Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush opposed him and endorsed his opponent. In fact, in EVERY SINGLE attempt he's made at public office prominent republicans have backed his opponents even endorsing democrats over him. He has no clout, and no prominent republicans have EVER endorsed him for ANYTHING.
If you're really ignorant enough to think that he, in any way, represents republicans then you are almost as delusional as Ery... Ok, I take that back. Nobody is as bad as him. Still, you need a serious reality check.
2 people like this

@anniepa (27955)
• United States
4 Feb 09
I think they're playing a game of "copy-cat"...lol! The Democrats almost nominate a woman so they nominate a woman for V.P. Never mind that there was no way Hillary Clinton supporters were going to vote for McCain/Palin, not if they were basing their vote on the issues at least, but they apparently didn't realize that. Now, we've elected an African-American President so they choose an African-American chairman. What will they copy next...lol?
Annie
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Feb 09
I've never understood why Black people in America seem to block vote Democrat in the first place. The Democrat party has done nothing but fail them over and over again.
But I doubt having a Black person as chairman will make a difference, I doubt most people know or care who the chairman of the RNC is.
@MntlWard (878)
• United States
3 Feb 09
It feels like they chose him to show they have black people in their party, too. Especially since he barely beat out Katon Dawson: a man who is a member of a country club that doesn't allow black members.
However, that's just my feeling. I haven't yet seen that Steele is a poor choice for the position, unlike another recent effort by the Republicans to display how "big" their tent is.
2 people like this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Feb 09
I guess stupid accusations like this are to be expected. Every time a black republican gains a prominent position the left attacks. Why do liberals feel they have some bizarre monopoly on black Americans? How is it sensationalism when he was ELECTED by a large group as he ran against several other candidates? He wasn't even the only black American in that race.
Black people have been taught for decades that Republicans are racists and hate minorities despite a complete lack of evidence to back such claims. Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice holding the highest positions EVER for a black man and woman (prior to Obama) didn't change the racist accusations against Bush and the republican party so no, I don't think this was any calculated move, but rather the best man for the job won through an election by his peers.
1 person likes this
@powermannx (450)
• United States
3 Feb 09
In no way do I feel this is a stupid allegation, it is a proven fact that the Republican party many stale ideas and agendas have continued to cripple this great nation in so many ways. Does this man stand up for the working class values of middle-class America? If President George Bush would have begun to negotiate and stimulate the economy this nation would not be in the financial turmoil working-class citizens face. Sad to say, even Colin Powell, George Bush and Condeleza rice speak of things they could have done differently if given the chance, how can this be when their administration had two terms to work towards greater goals.
1 person likes this





