Cheney fires back right after OBAMA finishes his speech

United States
May 21, 2009 10:27am CST
Was it necessary do you think? Should Cheney just keep quiet and let it go? Why would Cheney have so much to explain AFTER his term in office is over and he has no further obligations (in his words, "no elections to run")? Do you think the timing was intentional, just as Obama stepped down from the podium, in Washington Cheney was stepping up..
1 person likes this
7 responses
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
21 May 09
Actually, Cheney's speech was already planned and set long before Obama's was. That being said.....A message to D1ck Cheney........SHUT THE FACK UP AND RETIRE ALREADY!
3 people like this
• United States
24 May 09
Maybe he wants to run for President! lol
• United States
22 May 09
This doesn't surprise me one bit, Cheney's ego is larger than life itself. I am surprised he left the White House at all, I was expecting him to try to change the constitution.
2 people like this
• United States
22 May 09
high-five!!
1 person likes this
@peavey (16936)
• United States
21 May 09
I don't believe he should let it go. No one who has a strong and educated opinion should let it go. Cheney is a private citizen and has the right to say what he thinks - as we all do. Only those who are afraid of what he says think he should be stopped.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 May 09
I sure wish he'd go away and never come back but it looks like after eight years of secrecy he now feels he has to make up for lost time. I really got a kick out it being called his "Keeping America Safe" speech; I'd say it was more like "D1ck Cheney Covering His A$$" speech...lol! The tragic thing is that there will be another attack someday somewhere no matter what is done to prevent it. It's not a matter of "IF" but of "WHEN". I'm not saying it will be anywhere close to the magnitude of 9/11 or even that it will be within the U.S. but we all know there will always be terrorists and there will always be someone with an ax to grind. The D1ck is banking on this so he can use it politically. He speaks of how bad it is for our security for us to be arguing over policies but he's the one who's doing just that by going on every TV network that will have him to badmouth the new Administration! I always knew he was a hypocrite but I don't think I thought even he would sink as low as he has recently. Yes, I know he has the right to voice his opinion and I'd never want that to be taken away from any American but that doesn't mean he has to exercise that right when it does anything BUT "keep America safe". Annie
• United States
23 May 09
Yes, I know he has the right to voice his opinion and I'd never want that to be taken away from any American but that doesn't mean he has to exercise that right when it does anything BUT "keep America safe". Yea, agreed, that only creates division that we do not need if its in the name of national security and Cheney seems a little too Machiavellian to not know this if you ask me, he's got ALOT at stake and I pray that it doesn't come to desperation.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
21 May 09
The timing was obviously planned. No, he shouldn't just let it go because Cheney obviously feels strongly about this particular issue. Cheney is critizing the President's lack of planning and foresight on the subject not explaining his years as VP. In my opinion, President Obama made a mistake when he issued that executive order. His mistake was not having a plan. Now even many of the democrats are against him because they have denied the funding to close GITMO. Which for President Obama is really a setback in the year deadline. As of yet, no plan has been made. Sure he defended his decision but still THERE IS NO PLAN. This whole issue really centers around HAVING A PLAN.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
21 May 09
I agrea, with out a plan, he has no leg to stand on. Incidentaly, Cheney's speech was planned and set well before Obama's was, it wasn't planned as a response.
2 people like this
• United States
21 May 09
We have the freedom of expression here in this country, so Cheney has the right to stand up and give his opinion. After reading the above responses, I learn that the response to President Obama's speech was not planned, so the timing (for Cheney) worked out in his favor (I think). Cheney's explaining the actions of Bush the Yonger's administration is testament to the lack of character, respect, and honour displayed by the administration not only to the American people, but to the rest of the world. Bush the Younger did only one thing throughout his administration: he kept his word. I do agree that President Obama should have had a plan for closing Gitmo rather than rushing to keep his campaign promise of closing Gitmo within the year. It was not a wise decision. I am not too worried about Cheney keeping speaking out. The more he does, the worse the Republican Party sounds. His continued discourse detracts from his message.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
22 May 09
"I am not too worried about Cheney keeping speaking out. The more he does, the worse the Republican Party sounds." I would have thought you were right, but believe it or not, according to a CNN poll his favorable rating has increased by 8 points over the last week. He could be quite a thorn for Obama if this keeps up.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 May 09
I had seen that Cheney's ratings had went up after posting my response. I think mainly because his rhetoric was toned down and not as acerbic as before. But later news reports pointed out Cheney was still trying to put spin on Bush the Younger's record by claiming to cooperated with the CIA & FBI (Cheney actually fought against them the whole time) and claim usefulness of waterboarding and other intensive interrogation techniques (although CIA & FBI both claim that no useful intel was ever gathered by using such techniques).
1 person likes this
• United States
22 May 09
Taskr, Cheney's approval numbers were in the gutter, it doesn't take much to increase your approval numbers when they are horrible. I am just happy that he can't hurt the country anymore. I have no problem with him speaking his mind (I am sure that he is well compensated for these interviews, and speeches), that is his constitutional right. But, when you have a history like his, you would think he would want to lay low, and try to avoid contraversy for a month or two. But, apparently his ego is larger than his brain.
2 people like this
@us2owls (1681)
• United States
22 May 09
Cheney is doing nothing but exercising his right to freedom of speech - something we all have the right to. Obama is making himself more unpopular by the day. Cheney has nothing to do with that - Obama is doing it well enough all on his own.