More proof that Abortion is about Bigotry.

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
September 15, 2009 9:16am CST
Justice Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsberg made my case better than I could ever make it myself... "Frankly, I had thought at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion," Tell me Ms. Ginsberg, who are the people that make up the "population tha twe dn't want to have to many of"? Who are they who need to be set up for medicaid to fund abortions so you could enjoy the eugenic world you envision? Abortion on demand is about bigotry.. nothing more or less. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_071309/content/01125107.guest.html
2 people like this
3 responses
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
15 Sep 09
And just think, it's those hateful Christians who want to stop it.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
15 Sep 09
It's racists who want to stop it and those decent, minority loving liberals who see it as a means of population control, particularly for those poor minorities they claim to care about.
1 person likes this
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
16 Sep 09
Exactly.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
15 Sep 09
Wow... That is freaking scary. I knew, and have personally known people who have felt that way, referring to certain "populations" as breeders because they have too many children, but I never imagined I'd hear a supreme court justice saying it so clearly and specifically that they want to limit the growth in populations that we "don't want to have too many of". I know you're an honest guy Ted, but I'm sure you'll understand this is so off the wall that I'll have to thoroughly fact check it.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
15 Sep 09
Yup, she really said it on July 7, 2009 in an interview by the NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?pagewanted=4&_r=1
1 person likes this
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
16 Sep 09
[b]Yes, Taskr, she did say it. I was as astonished as anyone that for once a lying Leftist goofed & admitted the truth. But you need look no further than where Planned exParenthood puts most of their "clinics" to see the truth of it. As I've told people in MyBot before, I worked in a rare books & manuscripts library at the University of Texas at Austin, & I have held some of the original Eugenics Society's publications in my own hands and read them, & in them she speaks plainly about clearing out the "weeds" of human society, leaving a few, of course, to be servants. And PxP has, only a scant few years hence, vocally proclaimed her as their heroine still, & said their goals are still her goals. Bigotry is only the beginning of their crimes. Maggiepie "WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?"[/b]
@N4life (851)
• United States
15 Sep 09
I don't see anything surprising about this comment. I don't find it being the highest moral route, but then agais is not wanting unwanted children to have health care, equal schools etc any worse.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
16 Sep 09
So who do you think she meant by the people she doesn't want any more of?
@N4life (851)
• United States
16 Sep 09
My idea on who she does not want more of are those who refuse to work and take advantage of every handout they can while sucking up other public funds such as those put toward health care, etc.
@N4life (851)
• United States
16 Sep 09
oh..and a lot of someones do not want to do what it takes to ensure chidren recieve access to good education, heath care, etc.