Obama's "Pay Czar", Kenneth Feinberg proves his Marxism and Obama Tyranny.
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 22, 2009 4:09pm CST
The petty tyrant Obama and his mindless minion Kenneth Feinberg have proven their Marxism and disgust for the US Constitution.
Kenneth Feinberg has taken it on himself to slash the pay of private company employees. This is the kind of thing we expect from petty tyrants, not US Presidents.
There is no defending this, nor is there any excuse for it. No freedom loving person could ever even think this is a good idea. It is nothing but the bigotry of class warfare.
If this is the kind of country you want to live in, go find someone whose willing to change your smelly diaper! Freedom is for people willing to support freedom. Tyranny is for lazy, infantile fools who would rather be spoon fed than think or act for themselves.
Are you tired of the idiots Obama has surrounded himself with yet?
3 people like this
6 responses
@Koriana (302)
• United States
22 Oct 09
hmmm.....seems to me, the tyranny started when they decided to take my money, your money, our kid's money, to bail out these companies to begin with...it's all down hill now!!
but, tell me, reckon just how much these guys would be making if we had just let these companies go under, like we should have?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 Oct 09
So, anyone who accepts money from the taxpayers should be told what their salary can be?
There is no legal or Constitutional backing for this. There is only bigotry and tyranny. If you support it, then why shouldn't the tyrants tell YOU how much YOU can make?
You can't loath the freedom of others without resenting freedom for yourself.
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
22 Oct 09
Korinana, I agree 100% with you. If they want to make $100 Million a year, then pay us our money back. Pretty darn simple isn't it?
@Koriana (302)
• United States
22 Oct 09
there was not constitutional backing to bail them out either!!!
or for them to take money from the taxpayers, many of whom can't afford healthcare themselves, to give to others, who can't afford healthcare.
or...taking money from us to help businesses get started..
or probably 99% of what the gov't is doing!!
or has been doing for the past couple of decades...
but, I find it rather interesting, it seems perfectly okay when the transgression against the contitution benefits the rich, or the businesses, but oh, so bad, if it happens to benefit your average taxpayer!
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
22 Oct 09
The more I learn about Obama and his administration, the more I see communism. Weren't the communist the ones who pitted the haves against the have nots, just the way Obama has been doing? Didn't they take over private businesses and make them state run businesses, just like Obama is doing? Didn't they take over the media so that only their point of view was heard, just like Obama is trying to do? Didn't they try to have total control of the peoples lives, just as Obama is trying to do? We need to start paying more attention to what Obama and his administration is doing, and we need to know what communism can do to a nation, because it sure looks like we're headed in that direction.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
23 Oct 09
Once again, the village idiot can't stand to discuss anything without dragging Bush into it. Debater, you're a moron!
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
22 Oct 09
LOL, Best, you might want to research the last 9 years. If you do the research you will find that most of the bailouts, happened under Bush. Obama didn't nationalize the banks, Bush did. Obama didn't write or pass the Patriot Act that violated the constitution, that was Bush. Sounds like Bush tried to turn the country communist. But, you do the research yourself, and see what you have to say.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
23 Oct 09
This is just the beginning. And these people are quick. Obama is pushing everything through very fast except support for our troops which is a decision that should be handles very fast. The czars are ridiculous. This is just a way for his friends and relatives to pick up a fat check for helping to pursue this crazy philosophy. I have to say once again, if this is the country you want, there are plenty out there. Leave our country and freedom alone!
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
22 Oct 09
Perhaps, what is more troubling is what the Fed is doing. If Kenneth Feinberg can get away with this, than this has paved the way for the Federal Reserve to regulate all pay on every single business that deals with the government. That is the real danger that lies behind this. It won't just be the businesses that get bailed out but banks, lawyers, doctors, etc... That is the very real danger. We all know once the government gets involved there is no turning back from it. The damage will already have been done.
@Koriana (302)
• United States
23 Oct 09
I honestly think this is where it's heading!
and well if the people, the businesses, from little welfare recipient to major corp don't like it, the bast avenue to take is to not take the money in the first place!!
they can't play this game if we, the people refuse to play! and behind every business is....PEOPLE!!
if the people would start dealing honestly and fairly with each other, alot of the need for this money would not exist!
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
22 Oct 09
Not only is this worrisome because of the power that Obama's czars wield, it's worrisome for the economy.
These private employees, these CEOs, they get the big bucks because they make the company profitable. The idea that they will tie the compensation to company stocks and so the CEOs will be interested in the future of the company is a foolish action from someone who lacks comprehension. These CEOs are not tied to these companies. If they find their compensation reduced, they can leave that company and go to another. Important businesses who lose their best and brightest will suffer more economically. They will be in more danger of going under.
There are other companies who have paid back their bailout money and so are not under the control of the federal government. If I were one of these CEOs, I would go to work at one of those companies.
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
22 Oct 09
Oh poor Ted. Do you really want to defend multi millionaires that almost destroyed the world economy?
If they don't like what Feinberg has done, then they can always PAY US OUR DAMN MONEY BACK. And they can do anything they want to.
Any questions??
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
23 Oct 09
: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=chrysler+won't+repay+loans&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
22 Oct 09
Those multimillionaires are also the people who give us the jobs that keep the economy going. Perhaps you would prefer standing in line for, "Obama Money," like the people in Detroit.
@Koriana (302)
• United States
23 Oct 09
gee ya know, it's funny, but my bosses, my husband's boss don't strike me as the multi-millionaire type. I think the majority of the people are hired by small businesses, not the multi-millionires!
ya know what else, they are in trouble!!! The banks won't give them the loans they need to keep the business running, and the game wall street played has blown up so badly, their supply of work has run dry.
and what are those multi-millionaires doing, are they starting businesses here in the states, are they hiring more people here in the states....na!!
and ted, where's the source that says that obama said they don't have to pay this money back?
1 person likes this
