Talk Show Travail
By epicure35
@epicure35 (2814)
United States
November 23, 2009 3:46pm CST
Should Sarah Palin have appeared on the Oprah Winfrey Show? OMG, NO. She did herself a complete disservice. While I do not understand her motivation, other than to sell her book, I feel she demeaned herself. It's not just the fact that the big O snubbed her and foisted the other O upon foolish Americans, but the complicity of the gab "goddess" in the whole treason and New World Order anti-America billionaire power-elite subtrefuge.
Oprah is part of a group that includes George Soros and others who intend to use some of their largesse to control population, a lovely goal of Hitler's. Anyone who is a friend of George Soros is not a friend of mine or America's.
Oprah's ratings were (rightfully) going down. Sara gave her the highest ratings of her show in EVER. I think, in so doing, she temporarily removed the consequences of Oprah's harmful actions to America. OW wrongfully interjected herself and her influence into an election in order to sway it in the most dangerous direction; she is also much too full of herself. What do you think?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
24 Nov 09
I think you have managed to cram every one of your political beliefs into one small paragraph. Impressive.
Sarah Palin, much like Carrie Prejean, needs to hire a better spokesperson. In fact, they should never speak.
You have managed to leave out the Bush era and Bush family in general. They are among the families working toward population control and a central world government and banking system.
The new world order has been in place long before Obama was ever nominated, as you can see documented in movies like Kymatica, Zeitgeist, and The Esoteric Agenda, all conveniently linked to below.
If you feel like peeling away from hating on the two O's, you will be pleasantly surprised that Bush is heavily implicated in doing just those things you say you hate most.
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7575CE509D2B7AFB&search_query=esoteric+agenda+full+movie
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=0CE326F9F546C76&search_query=esoteric+agenda+full+movie
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
24 Nov 09
"they should never speak"
Yes because freedom of speech is a right only deserved by those who agree with YOU right? Aren't you the same person who accused mylot of violating your "freedom of the press" when your post was deleted for offensive content? lol
"Bush era and Bush family"
This thread is about Oprah and Palin. I guess when you are incapable of formulating an intelligent argument it's just easier to say "Bush bad!"
"They are among the families working toward population control"
That's funny since it's your liberal cohorts who keep saying pro-life people like Bush are "pro-overpopulation". It was Nanci Pelosi who recommended abortion as birth control and John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar who suggested forced abortions, and sterilization as population growth solutions
: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/21/obamas-science-czar-considered-forced-abortions-sterilization-population-growth/
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
24 Nov 09
Taskr - they should not speak, period, because everytime they do, they make themselves look like idiots.
I am all for the freedom of speech, but they always look like fools when they speak.
I am pressed for time now, and at work, but I will respond to you in full when I get home.
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
25 Nov 09
I skimmed your link cause its almost 11 and I have to be up at 5 for work. Bush's administration allowed for the flouridination of our water, and codex in our food supplies as a means for population control.
What your solution be, if not sterilization? We can't keep up at the rate we are growing. We are overpopulated.
All the "accidents" could be avoided if proper safety precautions and prevention took place. And for the families boasting about having 18 children, come on, really?
Happy medium somewhere?
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
23 Nov 09
No, I think that Oprah really didn't want Sarah Palin on her show. Oprah just didn't come across with the usual warm fuzzies that she usually giver guests. I usually don't watch Oprah any more not since Katrina. To me she is just a big hypocrite. she got together with some of her friends and run diapers down there then left. Dr Phil went and got some people into homes across the country and some jobs. I also don't like the people she is supporting in government.
1 person likes this
@epicure35 (2814)
• United States
24 Nov 09
Thanks, deebomb for your response. I watched that show just to see how O would act, because, ever since the election I have sworn off watching her. I detected a hard edge to her during the interview. Oprah has become too full of herself and too uncaring for the American people. She is way too self-important and I'm tired of her conspicuous consumption as a way to buy viewership. I'm sad that Palin boosted her ratings and wonder why O decided to interview her now. I will never trust Oprah again.
1 person likes this
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
24 Nov 09
[b]I used to admire her, but when she started preaching her mishmash of newage philosophies & her cafeteria religion, with its moral relativism, I was saddened & prayed for her, but she's so set in it now it'd take a lighting bolt from God Himself to put her on the right path.
Then I started noticing how she was buying audiences with cars & other goodies, & then she began supporting leftist causes, further & further leftist ones...& finally she shilled for Obama. Hello...last straw! ANY trust or credibility she'd had from me flew right out the window then, because I knew then what an anti-American racist that man is. I've seen much to prove that (& worse) since then, & nothing to the contrary.
So, I haven't really "trusted" her for years. And now that she's snooting down her nose at the folks who make America work? I don't even like her any more. The only sadness I have over her ending her show is that it didn't end at least a couple of decades ago.
Maggiepie
STALKERS WILL BE EATEN...
[/b]
[/b]
@sharone74 (4837)
• United States
17 Dec 09
I am a HUGE FAN of neither woman. And your comment that she is much too full of herself applies to both women now doesn't it? Except that one has a long list accomplishments with which to bolster her high opinion of herself. The other really doesn't now does she? And Hitler was not trying to control the population he was trying to destroy an entire race of people. Meanwhile if you were on his sanctioned list he fully supported and even demanded that those people should breed. The world population is enormous and among those trying to keep us from overbreeding and thus destroying ourselves would be the country of China and all of it's subsidiary colonies, Korea, and a quite a few other people. There is a difference between trying to stem overbreeding and being a Nazi or any other stripe or type of facist.
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
24 Nov 09
[b]Well, Epic, hun, I'm torn.
While I agree with you re "The Oprah," as Rush calls her, I think Sarah was brave, & yes, smart, to walk into the lion's den. By doing this, she was exposed (to previously unaware folks) as no "MSM" "news medium ever could or would have done--to Oprah's vast audience!
Furthermore, she came off extremely well, judging from the clips I've seen & the reports about her performance (even from people who expected her to flop). That means literally millions of people saw first hand that they'd been flat out lied to by the anti-Palin machine--which they know includes Oprah. The intellectually honest among them are now (maybe for the first time) seeing through the snide & vicious SNL joke mentality that machine invented & perpetuated.
No, still perpetuates, since they know full well she's effective, & a viable threat to their values & jobs! Anyway, Oprah's followers saw a personable, strong & competent Conservative woman, & (gasp!) she was even intentionally witty & funny, not full of gaffes or being the dim-bulb they'd been led to believe she is!
So, I think it was risky, but it worked. And I don't see this in any way as supportive of Oprah, just the opposite, in fact. I mean, after Oprah allowed one of her staunchest opponents on, & then was proven to be a dupe of the Big(ger) O, & a fool for supporting the increasingly unpopular "President," her own audience is now aware of how she, wittingly or not, suckered them! That can't be good for her, in the long run.
Oh, & Epic, I can't reply to your discussion, as SOMEONE has gotten your perfectly reasonable (though passionate) topic removed. Look out. They're out there, & not going to stop us 'til they get us thrown off. They've already lost me 3 of my posts! Just...be careful, & be ready, is all I'm saying.
Maggiepie
STALKERS WILL BE EATEN...
[/b]
[/b]




