21% Still Prepared to Vote Greene in SC

Tweet

The Dems in SC are beside themselves. When Alvin Greene, an unknown, beat out lawmaker Vic Rawl in the Democratic primary, the reaction was swift. They've mused over whether Republicans switched primaries in large numbers to vote for him (results show they didn't), to over whether he was a "plant" who was put in the race just to...what? win? That's a pretty interesting theory, after all. Some Republicans got together and said "let's find someone that no-one's ever heard of and run no campaign whatsoever and make sure it's someone who knows nothing about the issues and he's sure to win". "Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., in an interview with Fox News, suggested that hackers must have fiddled with the results. He said the touch-screen voting machines used by the state are notoriously unreliable and, without citing evidence, said the voting machines could have been compromised." Notoriously unreliable, eh? How do we know then that you really won your race, Representative Clyburn? Clyburn even suggested that someone at the state could have bought these machines on purpose, as they could be more easily hacked than other models. HUH? How deep does this imagined conspiracy go? But here's the best part: "Rasmussen Reports released a poll on Tuesday that showed Republican Sen. Jim DeMint trouncing Greene in a general election. The poll showed DeMint pulling 58 percent to Greene's 21 percent. " No-one knows who he is, they are sure he didn't win the primary and yet according to this poll he would still get 21% of the vote? If you ask me, the people showing a rather disturbed mental state are Clyburn and the other SC Democrats who are turning themselves inside out to find conspirators. For all I know the 21% who would vote for Greene are the sane ones. What do you think?