Don't ask don't tell is somehow still the law
By gewcew23
@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
September 21, 2010 6:15pm CST
Even though a federal judge ruled that the military's policy violated the first amendment and I would add violated the 14th amendment the Senate GOP stuck to their guns. Maybe one day we will grow up and except everyone as equals but today is not that day. Alright for some of you start celebrating you won.
2 people like this
9 responses
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
22 Sep 10
It will be intresting to see what happens when the DOD says okay we know how to run ourselves without DADT as a law. Will congress let the DOD just disregard the rule as the Military is currently looking into how to best allow gays into the military so none of the feared nastiness comes into play and that they are accepted if they decide to come out or not to their fellow soldiers which I think is the best way it should be the persons choice if they want to let their fellow comrades know about them in that way. The few army and navy guys I have talked to said they knew people who where in the military who where gay. one of my co workers at work said "All this stuff they talk about on TV about gays being allowed into the military they are already their and have been. I just told the person I am not so don't look at me in any way. But really their is no difference between a gay soldier or a straight one once that bullet or bomb goes off you forget all that stuff and survival kicks in."
He served in Vietnam and has his issues but he supports getting rid of this law as they are patriots just as he is. Many now in the DOD want this to go away but not until they are completely ready to make the change over which is what they are working on. Mccain wasn't to happy because the DOD several months ago started this investigation in how to change their view point on DADT and how to get rid of it so the DOD and not just a bunch of politicians want to do away with it. I say let the DOD figure it out then let them pass a really small bill that over turns the law.
The Supreme court has to rule to make a law get stricken from the books.
1 person likes this
@gitfiddleplayer (10362)
• United States
22 Sep 10
I know that a lot of people think this law is discriminatory because you shouldn't be able to ask if a person is gay or not in order to have them serve their country, but I think its important to note that if they can't ask that then they shouldn't be able to ask about a person's beliefs or anything deemed personal. Its not about accepting everyone as they are, its about learning what makes them who they are, but we can't ask those questions, that's too personal and we might offend them.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Sep 10
It's really pathetic, isn't it? The REALLY sad and disgusting part about the Senate GOP blocking this bill is it wouldn't do a thing until after the DOD completed its study so it's NOT as though passing this bill would be going against what the Pentagon wants.
I know there are those here who will REALLY disagree with me on this, but I'm also in favor of the so-called "Dream Bill". It doesn't mean I'm for amnesty for all illegal immigrants but I do believe those who came here as children when they had no choice but to accompany their parents or guardians should have a "path to citizenship" if they follow certain guidelines. Joining the military and putting their lives on the line is certainly good enough for me! After all, only a very tiny percentage of those of us who were born here are willing or able to serve, and I DON'T mean that as a put-down to anyone, I'm just stating a fact.
Annie
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
22 Sep 10
The Dream act is not amnesty. I wish people would actually look at the amnesty immigration bill that was past under Reagen before they call everything amnesty. What they don't understand is we already allow foreigners to serve in the military to gain citizenship, I will give you a link to a story about a group of Mexican that served in Iraq just to become citizen. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BUE/is_1_138/ai_n17210831/
Now onto DADT the GOP and yes those four Democratic senators are just close minded. They don't care that these men and women are fighting in a war that probably if I was to guess everyone of those Senators that blocked this bill got them into.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
25 Sep 10
I know but isn't it amazing how many people have no real clue what it is? I wrote what I did to clarify that I'm not for amnesty but I am for this path to citizenship for "illegal" immigrants who came here as children with their parents or guardians. I don't actually think these people should be lumped in with illegal immigrants since they had no choice in the matter. If I took my grandkids along with me when I robbed a bank but they had nothing to do with the actual crime, in fact didn't even know I was committing a crime, should they be arrested and put in prison? I say NO WAY.
Annie


@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
22 Sep 10
Of course, it still is the law. The Supreme Court, the President, nor Congress has overturned it. Just like Health care is still the law despite judge rulings in several states on the matter. Besides, it isn't a Republican hold-up when 4 democrats voted against it, including the Chair himself.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
22 Sep 10
Bet you are really proud of Harry Reid. Oh, wait he voted against it and it was his legislation. Ouch. Yeah, I proud they shut down what was a clear political play. But there was additional legislation on that bill that was troubling. Really, they should have just kept those kinds of things off the defense bill budget. Keep them as separate bills. You know that legislation might have had a chance if it had been all by itself. But still the law of the land because it has not been overruled by the President, by Congress, or the Supreme Court.
Apparently, you are misunderstanding that the law must follow the legal process to be overturned just as it followed the legal process to be passed. Every law that was declared Unconstitutional was done so by the Supreme Court and not on the word of one Judge. Parts of the Health Care bill are Unconstitutional (commerce clause) but you didn't seen that thrown out due to one judge. That's why its going to the Supreme Court. Do you really not see that it has to follow the same law to be disbanded as it does to be created?
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Sep 10
What four Democrats voted against it, sierras? I know the two Senators from Arkansas, Lincoln and Pryor, voted against it and I understand Reid did as the leaders of both parties often do and voted against it once he knew it wasn't going to pass, but who was the fourth?
Also, the GOP could have added their own amendments if they'd wanted to plus their cries that amendments shouldn't be attached to a Defense Authorization Bill doesn't hold any weight since they've done it themselves repeatedly through the years.
Annie

@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
22 Sep 10
It is really astounding that the greatest military in the world cannot do what most the other military's around the world have already done decades ago.
Are our military men and women incapable of being officers and gentleman?
Can we not assume that they will act like trained individuals and accept these folks just like they learned to accept blacks and women serving beside them.
This is about making up non-sense so that we don't discuss real issues in our political ballfield. Throw them out. These are most of the same politicians that gave he bank away, gave billions to the Pharma companies that then took it offshore and never asked Halliburton where a few hundred billion dollars "disappeared" to (witchcraft no doubt), or why KBR is still electrocuting our troops while they try to take a shower. WMD's anyone??
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
22 Sep 10
It is ironic that other militaries around the world allow homosexuals to serve opening but impossible here. Give some credit to our men and women, I think they are mature enough to handle themselves around someone who's sexually preference is not of their own.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
22 Sep 10
gew - it is still law because the bill did not pass. The bill did not pass because they add so much crap. There was defense issues, abortion issues, gay rights issues, amnesty issues.
If they really want to get it passed, they can produce a bill just for that.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
22 Sep 10
I am not sure about the whole abortion issues, the gay right issue was in the bill because DADT is a military issue, and the dream act is not amnesty but allows children of illegals to join the military to become citizens which is why it was in a defense bill.
One little side note here did you know that foreigner can become citizens by joining the US military? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BUE/is_1_138/ai_n17210831/
1 person likes this
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
22 Sep 10
Well, it's a district court, not the Supreme Court, so it's not so simple as "rule against it and it's gone." If I recall, their jurisdiction is about the same as a state court.
The ruling was based on the 5th amendment and the 1st amendment, but couldn't be based on the 14th.
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
23 Sep 10
Well, I do, especially if done by "executive order", as so many suggest. They aren't written in stone, and if the pro-DADT crowd wanted to continue be annoying, they could just argue he's making a law or some such nonsense. They'll think of something.
It's harder to fight a ruling that is based on constitutional grounds. I do agree, though - whatever, it takes, give it the boot.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
22 Sep 10
Bill Hicks has a quote for this "Gays want to be in the military. I don't know how you all feel about this but here's how I feel anyone DUMB enough to want to be in the military should be allowed it..."
Bill Hicks ahead of his time.








