The real cost of Obamacare...
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
November 13, 2010 8:34am CST
Part of the argument for passing Obamacare was about the high cost of medical coverage in the United State. Part of the argument against it was that it wouldn't decrease the cost, but it would actually increase it.
The proponents scoffed at that and pushed to have it rammed down our throats anyway.
Well folks, here is a memo from Conwey Trucking Company to its employees. The requirements of Obamacare will add $25 million to what it costs them to offer medical benefits to employees.
Way to go Obama, Pelosi and Reid. Your lies, corruption and fraud have taken the most expensive medical system in the world... and made it cost even more. What good are you?
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs039.ash2/35321_1391861194878_1182595814_30956183_5175817_n.jpg
8 responses
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
13 Nov 10
OK... I am going to talk about this from the top of my head, as I am not really familiar with your system.
From what I have heard about it, if you don't have a job, you don't have a medical insurance. So I assume that it is your boss who pays for it.
Why would you take the word of one company against the word of the government?
There are too many anti-Obama people in your country... to believe anyone at this stage.
What makes you think that you have the most expensive medical system in the world?
Is it because only the rich can afford a doctor? And the doctors know how to charge the rich?
A full private medical cover for a single male in Australia cost $2500 a year. How much do you pay for yours? And this is a private cover. Nothing to do with the government medicare cover for which you pay also.
Of course the cost will go up if you have to provide medical assisstance for all the people who don't have a cover under the old system. That's logic.
But part of that cost rise can be offset by providing doctors working for lower fees in the new system.
It is a fact of life that providing a medical system for everyone cost huge amount of money. And every country providing that service had its medical budget running in the red for decades. The government make up the difference from general revenue, so as to not increase its medicare levy on the taxpayer.
Australia does not have a medical cover for dentists, because the government simply cannot afford it. But in France, doctors and dentists are part of the one package.
If you are protesting against it, because it is going to cost you more, without giving you anything new for it. You are right.
But the scheme is about compassion for those who cannot afford to go to the doctor. And if you don't care about those people... there is nothing else I can say to change your mind. Obamacare is not about money. It is about compassion for the 40 per cent of the American population who have been living on the poverty line for decades.
I simply cannot understand how the richest country in the world can be so proud, patriotic and arrogant while 40 per cent of its population lives in poverty.
It reminds me of India building monuments to itself by hosting the Commonwealth games, while the majority of its population is starving in the street without a roof above their head.
We still have a few things to fix in this world. That's for sure.
And it does not look like it is the rich who are going to fix it.
1 person likes this

@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Nov 10
Aussies they are all on government assistance for medical care. what are you talking about?
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
13 Nov 10
I have met quite a few people on mylot in the last 4 years, doing it really tough while being sick. Yes they have a home, a tele and a car. But once they get sick, everything goes to hell and they cannot afford to pay their bills, much less a doctor. People have to mortgage their house in order to pay the doctor.
Implementing such a major change will take time. You cannot expect to have it all running smoothly in the first month. Not even in the first year. It was implemented in Australia in 1974, and they still are fine tuning it.
In Australia, it is not the company which pay for it. It is taken from your income at tax time. So every taxpayer pays it individualy. It is 1.5% of your gross income.
But your country will also find some benefits into it.
Since you are going to be treating more people, it will create work.
You will need more hospitals, more doctors and more nurses.
With less sick people, you will increase productivity.
And you will also increase life expectancy amongst the poor.
And relieve people suffering.
Those are all good things. And worth every penny.
In another thread a few days ago, I was discussing how the US had been spending 190 million a day in Afghanistan for the past 9 years. And you can double that with Iraq. So if you can afford 400 million a day to play war games, I think you can afford Obamacare.
1 person likes this
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
13 Nov 10
I will say, you completely missed the entire point. Obamacare really isn't about saving money. The problem is far more profound. It is usually the part that is hardest to explain and the most difficult for those outside of the US to grasp. It is about the government dictating to the American people that they have to purchase insurance whether or not they want it. That is the core of the problem. Americans do not like the Government interference in their lives. Especially something that fines them for NOT doing buying something. The freedom of choice is at the fundamental argument against Obamacare. Add in the lack of Price controls and you have a recipe for an unsustainable program.
From what I read, Australia is being to run into its own problems with Health care. I did read though, you pay for the Medicare system with taxes in addition to those contributions. Australia has to be very careful. It is going to fall into the situation with Medicare that the US is currently in. The problem comes in when more money is being taken out of Medicare than is being put in. This is the main problem that the US is facing.

@trruk1 (1028)
• United States
13 Nov 10
It would be more effective (and more useful) if just one person who rants against the health care reform legislation had a better idea. Just one. Instead of going to off into a tirade about "lies, corruption and fraud", one productive alternative would be good. Just one. From just one person. It hasn't happened and it isn't going to happen.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Nov 10
That's just not true at all Trruk1. First of all, there were a lot of other ideas from both Republicans and Democrats that Pelosi and Reid simply ignored. There were also ideas to not change the system completely, but to address the problems with the current system. However, that wasn't the agenda of Obama, Pelosi or Reid.
Sorry, but the Democrat inspired myth is simply not true.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Nov 10
but it passed, and for now we are stuck with it. So now, how are businesses going to be able to come up with more money to cover it?
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
13 Nov 10
I just have to slip in here with a LOL.
ParaTed could have pulled the "but you didn't answer the question; you're deflecting" move and refused to even acknowledge anything beyond that.
It would be fitting. But it's funnier to see it happening one way.
A better idea? Just one?
What was wrong with the incremental approach of changing laws to allow competition across state lines, or cleaning up the existing waste and fraud before developing the framework for singlepayer in the future?
You don't mean "just one." Be fair here. You mean: "just one that I like and that didn't come from the right."

@spalladino (17891)
• United States
16 Nov 10
Ok, Ted, now lets see a memo from a company that isn't as massive as Con-way Freight, with it's 365 operating locations...which, by the way, is one of the subsidiary companies of Conway, Inc., which operates on five continents with more than $4 billion in sales yearly. I really don't recall anyone saying that it wouldn't increase costs to employers.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
16 Nov 10
You really don't remember any of the people pushing Obamacare saying that it would reduce costs?
"We agree on reforms that will finally reduce the costs of health care," Obama said. "Families will save on their premiums; businesses that will see their costs rise if we do nothing will save money now and in the future. This plan will strengthen Medicare and extend the life of that program. And because it gets rid of the waste and inefficiencies in our health care system, this will be the largest deficit reduction plan in over a decade.
"Now, I just want to repeat this because there's so much misinformation about the cost issue here. You talk to every health care economist out there and they will tell you that whatever ideas are -- whatever ideas exist in terms of bending the cost curve and starting to reduce costs for families, businesses, and government, those elements are in this bill."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/dec/18/barack-obama/obama-said-health-care-reform-will-reduce-cost-hea/
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
16 Nov 10
The point is, this piece of trash legislation is a pack of lies, based on lies. Obama said that there isn't anything in the bill that will lead to higher rates.. well, we see that was a lie.
I know you don't "Feel sorry" for a mega corporation, and somehow the only way you can respect others' rights seems to be to "feel sorry" for them. Well, sorry, but this isn't about 'feeling sorry" for anyone. This is about a corrupt government and citizens who claim to love freedom despising the freedom of anyone they don't "feel sorry" for.
You don't want the problem fixed, you want Obamacare.. no matter what.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
16 Nov 10
Cost reductions will not be immediate but don't forget that the insurance industry is competitive. If Con-way Freight doesn't like what their current insurance carrier charges they're free to look at other insurance companies.
I just have a problem feeling sorry for a mega corporation that's listed on the New York Stock Exchange when Americans die every day from treatable illnesses because they can't get medical care...or insurance coverage.

@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
14 Nov 10
Ted, that is ONE COMPANY, I talk to hundreds of small businesses every week, and they are telling me that it will cut their cost. Is Conwey Trucking telling them the truth? Are they switching to a different plan that the company will pay much less, and pass the additional charges on to the employees (which is VERY common today, much easier to blame the government, and many don't like Obama care so they are an easy escape goat). You have to have all of the facts to stories like this before you just blindly follow them.
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
14 Nov 10
Ted, that is ONE COMPANY, I talk to hundreds of small businesses every week, and they are telling me that it will cut their cost. Is Conwey Trucking telling them the truth? Are they switching to a different plan that the company will pay much less, and pass the additional charges on to the employees (which is VERY common today, much easier to blame the government, and many don't like Obama care so they are an easy escape goat). You have to have all of the facts to stories like this before you just blindly follow them.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Nov 10
Yet the homeless are already eligible for medicaid. This does nothing for them that wasn't already being done.
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
13 Nov 10
Thanks for that info. My insurance policy is not being offered for 2011 and many of my senior friends find themselves in the same boat. So we are having to find new polices but they will cost us more.

@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
13 Nov 10
Yep, the completely ignored the fact that there was a fatal flaw in the system. Thus, rates will keep spiraling indefinitely no matter how many people buy into the system. The system as flawed as it was did have some very good things that Obamacare has outlawed such as Health savings plans.
As for better ideas, eliminate the necessity that people who are age 65 have to accept Medicare as their primary insurance. If the individual reaches that age and still is eligible for their work insurance why not let them carry that insurance as their primary until they retire? It will save money in Medicare without downgrading the benefits. Health savings plans are a great idea. Save money when you are healthy for the times when you are sick. Open up the competition field for insurance companies. Revamp the insurance malpractice industry. There are so many more simple things that can be done.
As for the fatal flaw, I have mentioned it before. There are no cost controls in place. Cost controls are effective in countries like Japan, Germany, Canada, England, and so on.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Nov 10
Because the goal isn't medical coverage for all, it is government control of the medical industry.. and our health choices.







