Obama Gave UK Nuke Secrets to Russia as Barter for Treaty

Just imagine what the next four years would bring?!

"I haven't heard much on this". There's the answer to one of my questions, will the media report? The answer is no. I searched the web. There is only the report in The Telegraph and one in the Daily Mail - not even all the UK media is covering it. Since it's from Wikileaks, you'd think they'd love it, all the anarchists do. The problem is that they love Obama more, no matter what he does, no matter where he goes, even if he returns the bust of Winston Churchill and gives up their nuclear secrets. This START treaty screws us as much as we've now screwed the Brits. The only winner in this treaty is Russia. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain. The Strategic Reduction part reduces the Arms to the amounts the Russians already (they claim) have. We're the only ones who have to Reduce. They don't have to do anything, we disarm and give them the UK nuclear secrets. Why wouldn't they sign such a thing? I fear that Obama will be re-elected, too. He isn't done destroying us yet - he needs another four years. The truth is the only thing that can hurt him and he's got the entire media paying defense for him.

I agree this is HIS vision. I dont understand why, if America is so bad, people arent leaving by the truckload rather than arriving?

This is all part of his vision. Unfortunately, it is a vision he got from his friends, the former 60s radicals, the marxist professors he admired so much in college, and his marxist father he is still trying to please. It's a vision that is destructive to America, but everyone is still so in love with the man, that they can't see the logical results of his vision. And the beat goes on...

What Obama is doing is making America weaker and make her enemies stronger. He is trying to reduce America's position in the world and as a Canadian who would love to visit America in the future more often, I have a vested interested in having America as a strong neighbor. And think what happens if there is a war, and the American military whose military men soldiers, etc are not paid enough, do not have the weaponry needed to fight back. The fall out from an atomic or hydrogen bomb dropped by its enemies will be wafted over the northern border. And that would mean a risk of deformed babies for those women who can get pregnant and an increased risk of cancer and other problems to the rest of us. So by signing the treaty, Obama has put us all in danger. And of course, the Russian government is still hostile even if it hides its intentions.

With Putin virutally in charge, Russia never stopped being our enemy. Putin is the former head of the KGB and a thug doesn't stop being a thug. He is just biding his time and working behind the scenes, although lately, the secret police tactics in politics has reared its ugly head again. We have no right to compromise another nation's security, it's really as simple as that. This is a betrayal of an ally. Obama is trying to change the alliances in the world.

I haven't seen one media outlet mention it. But I wonder if those who support Obama would really care if they knew. There is no chance that they would criticize him no matter what he did. At least the very far left criticizes him when they feel he isn't living up to their radical agenda. But the majority of Democrats in the middle who still blindly support him have no specific agenda other than supporting whatever he says on any given day.

Sigh... tell me about it! Maggiepie "Flush twice; it's a long way to Washington." ~ Source unknown

I think that he desired to have history declare that he ushered in peace, love and understanding by reducing nuclear arms. He didn't seem to notice that this treaty only reduces OUR arms and not those of Russia, who is regularly supplying the less stable countries in the world with arms that they can use when they attack peaceful people. He wanted this treaty enough to betray an ally.

Even today, few people realize that Clinton sold satellite technology to the Chinese or that the Clinton campaign took donations from Chinese nationalists. Somehow, these crimes by Democrats get swept under the media's rug. I agree that the START treaty is a huge mistake and a complete selling out of our security. I like what I know of Herman Cain. His biggest drawback is that he has never held elected office. The biggest factor in his favor is that Americans are looking for someone with private sector business experience, of which he has much and has been very successful. The race factor will be brought up if he runs, they will say that the Republicans are only running him because he is black, and suddenly it will be alright for the liberal media to bring up race in every discussion of him. Their rules only apply when they are accusing others. I think Obama has committed impeachable offenses. The truth is, if you follow the Constitution exactly, most presidents do within hours of taking office, simply because the Executive branch powers have been extended far beyond what was meant. However,Obama outdoes them all in this area. If Obama's aim is not to destroy America, then he's doing a terrible job. However, I think that is his goal and if so, he's doing a bang-up job of it.