Do you agree if 2 years was added to school?.. 7th grade and 5th year...

Philippines
February 12, 2011 6:29am CST
This rumor has started a while back, and some say it's going to be implemented next year. In the Philippines, the 6 years of grade school would become 7 years, and the 4 years of high school would become 5 years. They say that this would be the solution to the low status of our education..i think not. To improve our education, the quality should be made better and not lengthening the years in school. better facilities, books and school supplies should be given to the poor students, more classrooms too. If only more budget would be for education What do you think would make education better?
3 people like this
10 responses
@lady1993 (27225)
• Philippines
12 Mar 21
it has been implemented now, and I am not sure if there's a positive impact yet .
1 person likes this
• Philippines
23 Mar 21
well now what we have a pandemic, not good at all. veyr sad
1 person likes this
@lady1993 (27225)
• Philippines
26 Mar 21
@stanley777 yeah, some have even stopped school
1 person likes this
@daeckardt (6237)
• United States
13 Feb 11
I don't know that adding time to the number of years required to graduate would accomplish anything except to keep kids locked up for two more years. I don't know what it is like where you are from, but I know in most American schools, the teachers teach to the test. This causes students to not learn the material that is needed to succeed in life. What they really need to do is stop worrying so much about testing students and start teaching them again. There should be more practical work done in schools and less worksheets and exercises that have no use in real life. The classes I did best in had exercises that were like doing the real thing. In my high school accounting classes, I had to go through all aspects of accounting for a business. If I just read about it and didn't do it, I might know the theory, but I wouldn't be able to do it. There should be more of that type of education, and less of what goes on now. You could probably cover everything needed in less than the twelve years required by most states.
@daeckardt (6237)
• United States
14 Feb 11
Unfortunately, most people who would be qualified teachers look for other types of jobs because teaching has such low pay. As far as practical training goes, if you don't have practical experience when you get out of school, you will not be able to get a job. Sure, employers are willing to train, but they want proof that you can think and do things rather than just spitting out information that you were spoon-fed so that you could pass a test. That's not to say that there isn't a place for theory, but it seems like everything in school is theory with little practical.
• Philippines
15 Feb 11
Yeah, I agree the pay is too low compared to other professions.Here in our country teaching is a noble profession but our government are not giving much importance to them.Education is the only cheapest contribution the government can extend to their people but still laws in favoring salary adjustment is very hard to enact.So many professionals mostly teacher preferred to work overseas with a good pay even though some jobs are not related to their profession so the qualified teachers are gone and what is left are the sub standard ones.Education here is taken for granted and now they say they'll add more years, that's not the solution.They should help upgrade teaching profession by increasing their wages and give more support to our educational system.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yes, adding more years before graduation is not the answer.Government must hire qualified teachers to ensure quality education.Lengthening the number of years in school will definitely add more expenses to parents.I guess you mean more practical way of teaching or what we should do in the real world and less in theory will be more applicable and easy to understand than doing worksheets and exams.thanks
1 person likes this
@doggydimon (1369)
• Philippines
13 Feb 11
I agree with you. Quality over quantity... That is the way to go with our education system. What would the additional 2 years of schooling do if you still don't have the facilities or the rooms to do it with? Providing them with all the supplies they need, hiring dedicated teachers armed with the right knowledge and experience(I knew some back then that didn't know what were they teaching), and a campus conducive for studying, these are what our school children need for them to really learn something and not additional school years...
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Two thumbs up to your response my friend!!!Quality is to quantity...one of the example to this is a very competent teacher to small numbers of student. During my high school days, I experienced a crowded classroom, one teacher is to 70 students which is not conducive for learning.Yah, it was really really not!How can you concentrate studying if you almost can't hear each other or the teacher can only focus to students in front or those who are really very willing and attentive. The government should hire more teachers every year to accommodate the increasing number of students.
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yeah, quality education and competent teaching force for our students.Building additional classrooms to prevent overcrowding which is not conducive to learning.There must be a quota for the number of students per classroom per teacher. Lengthening their years in school is not the solution.Qualified and dedicated teachers is the answer.thanks to both of you...
@aisoice (272)
• Indonesia
18 Feb 11
Dear Stanley777, I strongly agree with your opinion. Smart size rather than length of study. More attention to quality teaching and learning process and better education facilities, would be far better results than the additional length of study. Although the duration of study plus, if the quality and facilities are not improve, I think the result will not be better, could even be worse.
• Philippines
18 Feb 11
Yes, Students need quality education from qualified teachers.They must also enforce the number of students (quota)per school room.School buildings atmosphere must also be conducive to education of the students complete with learning facilities for practical learning.In doing so there is no need to lengthen the students stay in schools.thanks...
• Australia
12 Feb 11
If anything, schooling in all countries should be shorter. Have a deep think about how unproductive your schooling lives were; learning things that really had no benefit or relation to whatever you're doing today. I once heard it takes 2 years of constantly working at something to master it. Now why don't we shorten the schooling period instead and turn kids into assets of society, rather than spend countless years learning crap.
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
@ dixonduong, I would not agree with you my friend in shortening the period of schooling for students.I guess 6yrs in primary and 4 yrs in secondary is acceptable if only teacher are most qualified and the module are up to date than it would be easier for students to comprehend.thanks for your time. @ viasvis, I guess our friend is not ready yet.
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
12 Feb 11
my friend your in an opposite direction because government asking for adding you asking for shorten. Do you want to go to school... or you only gimick. LOL see you around welcomr to mylot
@Ichiru101 (284)
• United States
16 Feb 11
Well having more knowlegde is never bad. After a few years of adjusting it would probably feel the same as it was before.
• Philippines
17 Feb 11
Well my friend, more years in school is good because you gain knowledge especially those who are taking Master's Degree.The problem is some parents can not afford the additional expenses they would pay for 2 more years of education.thanks...
@crazyrk (817)
• Brazil
12 Feb 11
As in Brazil, which had its 11-year curriculum changed to a 12-year some years ago and didn't have an increase in the quality of education, I disagree time means better education, in fact, I'm for the idea of home schooling, as most schools don't have a good environment nowadays (at least in Brazil). I agree with you, but I think the right way to go is to invest in the teachers: they're what really matter, not books or facilities, as new technologies make information easy to obtain, the necessity nowadays is to teach kids how to deal with information, scientific thought etc., besides loads of information.
• Philippines
13 Feb 11
Yes, the teachers are the most important in helping the students become better. If only we had the budget for training programs, these past few years, the budget is just going into the politicians pockets..
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
12 Feb 11
I think this would be applicable only for public which need huge rehabilitation of quality of teaching. From their teacher should be filtered the quality one, because it will affect to the students... In private depends on the discretion of the school. see you around
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yeah,I agree because mostly public school teachers have lower salary than private school I guess.The best thing to do is hire teachers who are really qualified and have them undergo upgrading seminars and more up to date tutorial modules for them.Most private school also asks for higher tuition which in return students gets higher standard of teaching.Thanks again...
• Philippines
13 Feb 11
I don't agree to this because the more years of schooling will be the more out of school individuals. Poor family can't almost afford spending their children to school in 6 years elementary and 4 years secondary, how much more if another years of schooling will be added..
• Philippines
13 Feb 11
YEs, I quite agree with you- even with the education now, many kids can't afford t go t school, if more years would be added, then they would be discouraged to go school. Thank you for your response.
12 Feb 11
Yes. I would definitely agree. Over the past 2 years in High school, I have experienced nothing but programs. To be honest, I'm sure any other worried student will feel the same. If you'd want to achieve a good education, you'd either have to enroll yourself to a prestigious university or hire your own tutor. As for me, even if all the books, classrooms and all those other facilities would be renovated, 2 years were still wasted and 2 years will always be time. And time is something I can never give up and waste.
• Philippines
13 Feb 11
Thanks for your response... Maybe 2 more years would be helpful, but it would also be a burden to the students and parents- since more years means more tuition; and if the quality of education stays the same, nothing will happen.