The most prolific thought I had in a while.

@CJscott (4187)
Portage La Prairie, Manitoba
May 10, 2011 3:41am CST
I was thinking today, about history and wars, and it seems to me, that you don't hear about many wars being fought over men, but Women, they have a rep for starting some trouble. And it came to me. Just out of the blue, no wars are started over men, because men just aren't with fighter over, some are worth fighting for, or at least their ideas are, but very few are worth fighting over, and the ones that are, tend to distance themselves from those situations. Does that thought make sense to you guys?
3 people like this
5 responses
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
10 May 11
Yeah I think soo your correct and that thought is wonderful
@CJscott (4187)
• Portage La Prairie, Manitoba
11 May 11
What makes you think I am correct?
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
11 May 11
yes in thought but to others I don't know... see you around
@taski24 (214)
• Philippines
11 May 11
No, it doesn't make sense. If you'll look back in History, wars are fought because men are fighting over freedom, authority, wealth, power, or natural resources. The only war that was caused by a woman is the Trojan war, which is just a myth. Also, in earlier civilizations, women are not in the same standing with men. They are treated as lower kind of species, hence, not worth fighting a war over. Gender awareness and development is a young concept.
@CJscott (4187)
• Portage La Prairie, Manitoba
11 May 11
With the strongest reason being wealth or power, greed however you look at it. I would imagine that Gender awareness and development goes back a lot further then you would imagine. Some civilizations revered woman, others demeaned them, depending on which part of the world and how far back you go, and how much you can trust the fragments of records we have of these events. How can you be sure the Trojan war is a myth? It is a great story either way. Only a fool would think a woman is a lower kind of species, I bet many men in those societies were killed by their wives or their mistresses. Thanks for the response, I appreciate the debate.
@buenavida (9985)
• Sweden
11 May 11
One good thing is that no men have fought for me..
@CJscott (4187)
• Portage La Prairie, Manitoba
11 May 11
Where you noticed it anyway.
1 person likes this
@yspmyl (3435)
• Malaysia
10 May 11
What I think about your though is that man are more easily get jealous when someone touches their woman, so there fight and war started. Whereas when look at woman, they will not really fight for man but they will use tactic to lure the man back to their side.
@CJscott (4187)
• Portage La Prairie, Manitoba
11 May 11
Working Smarter not harder, no wonder women deserve more respect then most men. Seems they are sneakier also though, a very strong conundrum.
@RebeccasFarm (86823)
• United States
12 Jan 21
Yes it makes perfect sense and the art of war