If a tree falls in the woods do you assume the other political party did it?

United States
May 13, 2011 2:55pm CST
Or had something to do with it. With antagonistic talk show hosts from every angle, how divided are we becoming? I'm talking primarily about America. All the animosity seems antiproductive. How bad is it in your opinion?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@sswallace21 (1824)
• United States
14 May 11
Welcome, I think that each party is too quick to point the finger. If we truly need to be separated, then we truly need to find a common ground. The only thing the fingerpointing is doing is causing friction between the parties. I know there has to be a common ground somewhere. Stop blaming each other and working together would be an excellent start. As for the tree, don't you think we should blame the bush? Best Wishes!
• United States
16 May 11
Could be the wind, dry rot, lightning or some really STRONG bear urine that really brought down the tree. :) I hope the people we are electing can still find ways to work together.
• United States
16 May 11
You got that right. Best Wishes!
@ravisivan (14082)
• India
14 May 11
People tend to be prejudiced most of the times. Yes. If we talk in terms of countries each of us will support his country. If we talk of parties automatically each of us will support our party. So when any blame is to be passed on it is always pointed out others. Successes are owned by people. Failures are not owned by anybody. This is also a reason why each political party blames another. Talk shows are used as platforms for communicating their ideas and also a tool for canvassing for future elections. I hope I have communicated clearly.
• United States
16 May 11
I think that pursuing the idea of owning failure is a good way to go.
@ravisivan (14082)
• India
16 May 11
Basically we are prejudiced. The extent of prejudice differs from person to person. Some people like more people. Some people hate more people. Interesting. have a good day
@celticeagle (190127)
• Boise, Idaho
13 May 11
The talk show hosts have a job to be controversial and keep stirring the pot. What I have seen in the past seems to hold true to that. It is rather antiproductive and it is giving us every possible angle. I guess that is the way of the new polictical arena. Opens a whole new way of debating the issues.
• United States
16 May 11
I'm concerned too many people are using talk shows not as a starting point for conversations but as the basis for their own inflexible ideas: Like mind-controlled sheep.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (190127)
• Boise, Idaho
17 May 11
People need to broaden their horizens, that's for sure.
@bounce58 (17380)
• Canada
13 May 11
I am not too much into politics, but I do watch and listen to sports talk. I think they do the same thing. They say a lot of controversial things to generate interest. Sports is tribal, so it is generally a good thing to spew out antagonistic remarks, specially to other teams. It bonds people with the same affiliations. Unfortunately, it doesn't work the same in politics.
• United States
16 May 11
It's possible the political pundits have been watching too much sports and have adopted too many of their inflammatory habits, I guess. Nobody got the memo that we're all on the same team in community building?