Milwaukee Public Schools send Lay Off notices.

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
June 29, 2011 6:55pm CST
They call each other "brother" and "sister" in the union, but where is the "brotherhood" when those who knew they wouldn't lose their jobs voted against the jobs of those without tenure? Gov. Walker's newly signed budget gave local governments and school boards the tools to reduce operating costs, without laying off workers, or reducing salaries. But that wasn't what the unions and tenured teachers wanted. With the help of the Milwaukee Public Schools board, they pushed through contracts with few concessions... now it's time to pay the piper... and the ones paying don't even get to dance. http://www.fox6now.com/news/witi-20110629-mps-job-cuts,0,429877.story
3 people like this
6 responses
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
1 Jul 11
Like all Unions, they always cut off their own people. This is what happens when people control their own paycheck. The ultimate result is that everyone refuses to yield to economic reality. Just because you signed a contract that forces the company to pay you more, doesn't mean the company has more to pay you with. In this case the government. Thus, if they don't have the money, you get laid off. Now your 'minimum wage' is 0. Minimum wage by the way, is the exact same thing. Every time the minimum wage goes up, people lose their jobs. Btw, does anyone remember the last thing Bush did before 2008 when the economy crashed? Anyone remember? Federal Minimum wage went from $5.15/hr which it had been since 1997, to 7.25. It went up in 70ยข increments, the first one in July of 2007. Coincidence? Did you ever wonder why when all the big problems in our economy was in the banking industry, with all those high wage earners, how we had such a problem in the lower class being out of work? This is why. Had nothing to do with banks or loans. And it's not the first time either. Anyone remember a former Bush that got fired for having a recession in 1991? Anyone want a guess at what was the last thing Bush did before the recession? That's right, minimum wage went from $3.10 in the 80s, to $4.25 in 1991. Funny how we never learn from our past mistakes, eh? Sorry.. I seemed to have run off into a minimum wage rant because of the unions. Blame them for it.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
2 Jul 11
I was reading an article on FDR and the Depression. He started the minimum wage and as a result many people who would have worked for less could not and were there for unable to support their families. The way to get out of a recession is to let the prices,and wages find their equilibrium and then the economy can start to grow again. Right now you have the government paying higher than average wages and it is also pumping up housing prices with low interest rates. They are forcing banks to foreclose on homes where the mortgage is current but the house is under water and the bank has to reduce its asset to debt ratio. Then the government will not let the banks sell the houses at a loss so empty houses sit there. With the wages the government is paying unemployment for a longer time and many people are able to work for cash and along with the unemployment the live comfortably.
1 person likes this
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
3 Jul 11
It's a universal truth, that if you give away money under some requirements, suddenly more people will meet those requirements. If you allow people to have unemployment longer, they'll take unemployment longer. Which means they won't work as much. Welcome to economics 101.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
30 Jun 11
It's going to take the rank and file realizing that the union is not as much about helping them and working for them as it is about power for the union leaders. The tenured workers think this is all just fine, they keep their jobs even if they are unqualified or perform poorly. The people who suffer most are the qualified employees who just don't have as many years in the union to get to keep their jobs, no matter how well they perform them. In the case of the schools, the children suffer with teachers who are useless or even dangerous but cannot be fired because they have tenure and by losing quality teachers who get laid off under the strict "last in, first out" rule of the union. Hopefully, now that Governor Walker has set them all free to choose whether to join the union or not, more and more public sector workers will choose not to join the union and finally be rewarded based on merit and not cronyism.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jun 11
True! Now that the law is in effect, unions can't bargain for benefits, so the school boards, elected by the people, get to make the rules, not the unions. The employees are still free to be members of the union, but only members can be required to pay dues. I guess the biggest thing that scares the union leaders is they'll have to show their worth to the members, instead of hiding behind the force of law.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
30 Jun 11
The main worth of these unions is protecting the worst workers at the expense of the best. There are certainly tenured teachers that are great, but they are being treated exactly the same as tenured teachers that don't give a crap. That's "equality" for you.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
1 Jul 11
A few years ago it was a choice between laying off teacher or getting coverage for Viagra. In a school district near me the Union would not let the teachers vote on a new contract until the School Board agreed not to change Insurance Companies which they could get the same coverage but at less cost to the district. In one school I worked in the the board wanted to change the policy to include a higher deductible with the district reimbursing the employees on a monthly basis their deductible expenses and the Union refused. The district could have saved over $1,000 per employee a year with no extra cost to the employee and the Union still refused. The Union is all about their power and the kids be d*mmed!
1 person likes this
@GardenGerty (169448)
• United States
30 Jun 11
It is too bad that they do not really take care of each other. It is still the kids that suffer.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jun 11
Which is why I don't accept the "it's about the kids" arguments when the teachers and/or unions are pushing for more money.
@kenzie45230 (3560)
• United States
1 Jul 11
It happens all the time. Teachers and their union are given the option of having no raises so that everyone keeps their jobs, or having to lay off some teachers and they always choose laying off and then complain about the government that laid them off. Same thing happens to police and firefighters. Thankfully now, because of the mess in Milwaukee earlier this year, we're on to their tactics and we know that they lie.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Jul 11
The saddest part is this is just one event in hundreds going on all around the country. I believed in Unions once. I still think a few have their place, but they need to get out education completely. Our children's futures are too important to let teachers be treated like bargaining chips in a low stakes bid for a couple ridiculous benefits. My best advice for anyone who has the time or money: Homeschool!