Should Churches be TAXED????

@bird123 (10632)
United States
August 6, 2011 12:08am CST
I can't speak for all countries, only for the USA. USA's biggest expense is humanitarian such as welfare and medicare. Further, USA matches and gives funds to relief agencies that help feed the world. USA wouldn't be in the debt shape they are in if they didn't care for so many people. Churches have had tax free status from the start. I see the role of churches as not only spiritual but humanitarian. Shouldn't they be taking care of the poor?? I'm sure many do but most of what I see of churches is the mansion or palace they build for churches. I see pastors living the high life. Some have million dollar houses. Seems the USA is doing more of the church's work than the churches yet the USA allows them special treatment, why?? I think churches should be taxed in the rich bracket that they are in until they start doing God's work, tending to the basic and spiritual needs of the people rather than accumulating wealth and physical possessions of this Earth. What do you think? There are always exceptions to everything. There are many small churches doing it right. There are communities that could not survive without the good works, kindness and help they provide. God is very pleased. It's that Fat Cat that I'm after.
3 people like this
18 responses
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
6 Aug 11
The money the church gets from its congregation does not go so the pastor can have a fancy car. He often lives in the same type of house that they do, but a little larger because it serves also as a study and they have to help others out when then come into town. Even if the church is in a rich neighbourhood the money came from the congregation, it goes for his salary, and also for supporting the poor, mission work, etc. If one does tax the church, that might mean that the government does charitable work and the government gets the glory instead of God. Is this not the case of envy? After all it is not their fault that someone is rich or someone is poor. I do think that churches have to keep records so that the government knows that the tithes, and offerings are for what it is intended to and not so that the minister can go to Bermuda with all the congregation funds and live a wild life.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
Accounting firms are great. Several were named in the downfall of some large corporations where people lost their retirement savings. So a corporation goes to their accountant. The accountant says: We can't be cooking the books. The corporation says: if you won't do it, we will take our business elsewhere. The accountant asks: How well do you want them done? I do know a pastor who got a new luxury car last year and this year an all expenses paid vacation this year. There are many evangelists, probably some of your favorite ones, living very high. One day the local TV station did a story of all the pastors living in million dollar houses. You would be surprised. Oh, one poor pastor's house was only 850,000. I must count him in with that bunch. Of course, there are good churches out there. One can never say everyone is the same. Church is a very big business.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
8 Aug 11
You still are thinking that the minister has to live poor in order to think well of him, and give all or most of the money he gets from preaching to the poor. I am sure that he would make sacrifices. For instance, the manse might not have a big screen 3d Tv, and they might not have gold plated faucets while the rest of the neighbourhood would. The minister would go to places where the gospel needs to be preached in foreign countries, not to the Cayman Islands. They would not go and see wordily movies or buy worldly movies, and be careful when getting dvd that they are out lifting. And of course the music. So whereas you might hear rap blaring from the other houses, you would hear classical and sacred music coming from the minister's house. Also how would it look if he lived in a poorer house then the rest of the neighbourhood? It would mean that the congregation did not value him and thought he was beneath them. Surely in being in a wealthy neighbourhood, they would not up his house to look like a castle when the rest of theirs look like mansions. In poorer and middle class, the congregation would give him a little better house then theirs, because well that is where visiting clergy stay, they have more guests over, have to have a book study, and a private study for him to prepare the sermons, and of course, his wife is expected to entertain and often hold the tea socials, etc. Besides the job of the pastor is to preach the gospel, not to give money to the poor. If he has a fancy house like everyone one, then the congregation has no problem with him living to the same standards as they do. It is also what is inside that counts. I am sure in wealthy congregations, if it were of our church, most everyone would have a piano or an organ, and that would come first before a big screen Tv. And most of the money would go for kitchen equipment and for books. And instead of heaving four cars for each person, it would probably be one car for each adult and the one used most would be the van.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
Wealth does not equate evil unless it prevents you from doing God's work. I can't go along with the pastor living in a mansion simply because it fits in the neighborhood. The pastor could be an example to the community instead of lavish in the riches.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
6 Aug 11
Actually, at anywhere between 40 and 54% US biggest expense is military. Of course the government publishes figures that are deliberately misleading; $150 billion dollars of money from other budgets actually goes to military ends and much of US interest is due to overspend on past military campaigns. So the 20% claimed is wildly inaccurate; CDI gives 51% and FCNL 41%. In fact US military spending is 47% of the total world military spending. Should Churches be taxed? A Church is a collection of people and to tax individuals twice would be discriminatory. Should Church organisations be taxed? Many Church organisations operate on a shoe string, therefore no. Should rich Church organisations such as the Roman Church be taxed? Probably yes all the best urban
@urbandekay (18278)
6 Aug 11
0ops, my last line should read, Should rich Church organisations such as the Roman Church organisation be taxed? Probably yes all the best urban
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
OK. Tax the rich churches and leave the poor churches alone. Sounds good to me.
• Canada
8 Aug 11
How do you determine which church is rich and which is poor? What about a church that's saving money for some expensive project (like a new building or major renovations - perhaps a homeless shelter or something rather than it's place of worship) it's planning to do?
@uath13 (8192)
• United States
7 Aug 11
I have to agree with you. When a church can build a multimillion dollar complex capable of seating the entire population of the 3 surrounding counties they're definitely not non profit. We've got one in the next town over.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
9 Aug 11
Perhaps the issue isn't building a building. It's building a lavish building. Yes, if money wasn't wasted, there would be not problem feeding people with the exception of politics.
• Canada
9 Aug 11
bird123, what's a "lavish" building? Do you really want churches to be concrete boxes like 1960's office towers or warehouses? A good building can be a landmark, last for centuries and be nice to be inside. Just being as utilitarian as possible gets boring. When you consider the price of the land and the cost of building something that will serve the function, building something that is also nice doesn't have to add that much to the overall cost.
• United States
6 Aug 11
It disturbs me a little that I still consider taxes churches sometimes. It is terribly frustrating that big churches are abusing the system to make a handful of people rich and let others hide their income. But I always wake up and remember how dangerous it is to go down that road. Taxation always leads to defacto controls that America vowed not to impose upon churches. We already have abuses built into the system to give at least the appearance that the government favors Christians, we don't need to make that worse. We certainly can do more to investigate cases of abuse and limit the definitions of "church" when it comes to tax free status. I also don't think the government can claim to be much better at serving the poor than most churches. There is too much waste as the money passes through the government. All that said, both the government and the churches should have the needs of the poor and downtrodden foremost in their plans as well as hearts.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
I can't argue with so much of the money is wasted but at least the government is trying. Yes, there are good churches out there as well. If they were to tax churches, they all must get taxed the same. Can't have special treatment. It wouldn't be fair.
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
6 Aug 11
Amen how much do you wanna bet if they charge churches tax's they so 't charge Muslim church's the church's of America did not throw us in debt sondon't take it out on them
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
7 Aug 11
The government has done alot of unfair stuff so it wouldn't surprise me
@stary1 (6612)
• United States
6 Aug 11
This has been debated a lot and I can see points from both sides. Ultimately I come down on the side of no taxes because I think churches need to be encouraged to do charitable work. I understand your point about the huge elaborate cathedrals, spending money etc., but nothing should be done to discourage their work with the needy. In fact, government should get out of the business and turn it over to churches as I understand churches handle charities much more efficiently and effectively. I also think twice about the pastors who live grand lifestyles and wonder how they reconcile that with their faith, but I leave them for God to judge.
• Philippines
6 Aug 11
Yes you are right. Church must do charitable works and as far as I know there's a rule that separates the church and state. Nowadays churches are not fulfilling their charitable duties besides religion like catholic, 700 club and other religious groups are using the name of God to accumulate wealth and using the funds for their selfish needs. According to world bank 5 years ago that Catholic church is top 1 richest organization in the world but they don't use the funds to help the needy people besides they also sell indulgences to their members just to accumulate more wealth. If I were the pope right now I will use all of the funds to help the poor countries like africa, and other countries under the 3rd world.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
stary1 I think you are right government should get out of that business. On the other hand, the way things are now,no one else, including churches, will do the job. It is wonderful there are people in this world that do care. They always speak for God. Voracious. Recently, much has come out on the catholic church. If I were catholic I would protest the using of money to cover up child molesting priests. How can anyone think that was justified?? I also heard that when popes are buried that it's sealed or lined with gold. Maybe you know something about that. Indeed, there are much better places to use money. Just a little money can make a big difference in poor countries. I guess it's hard for some to use the money for God's work. They value material things too much.
• Canada
8 Aug 11
Does the Catholic church (or any other) still sell indulgences? I thought this stupidity stopped centuries ago, it was one of thing that turned Martin Luther against the Catholic church.
@koperty3 (1876)
6 Aug 11
In my native country Catholic church does not pay taxes at all. I can tell you more. The Government still support church. I'm against it. I saw many times new cars belongs to priests and most of them they don't help other people. They are involve in the politic of the country and sometimes manipulate people. They say in church how other people should vote. Maybe my post will be very controversial but I don't abuse any religion. I'm saying how it is in Poland. In UK where I currently live church is not so involve in politic. Also is in the shadow.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
A church is supposed to speak for God. I do not understand how so many can sit back and allow the corruption. There is no doubt change is needed.
• Canada
8 Aug 11
You expect a C.E.O. a rock star or a politician (particularly a high ranking one) to show up in a good car. Why make an exception for a bishop? There are also security concerns and other practical considerations. If the priest's car is always breaking down, it makes him or her less effective at their job. Maybe they need to carry other people or things. Some religious leaders have families (obviously not Catholic ones, usually). Some might be using their vehicles to carry sports equipment, food donations etc. if they're the "hands on" type.
• Philippines
6 Aug 11
Yes I agree with you because here in our country priest accepts money came from any forms of gamble under the table, besides they use the church money to buy those such luxurious cars for their personal use. What I hate most is the archbishop himself was involved in this kind of anomaly.
@_sketch_ (5742)
• United States
7 Aug 11
Yes, I do. I understand that they do do charitable work and in these activities, they should be exempt, but most of their money is for themselves, for building the church and in these activities, then I believe they should be taxed. I do not see any reason why they shouldn't. Churches are just a different type of corporation; they are businesses; and I think they should be treated as such.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
10 Aug 11
Bland?? Should we provide entertainment???? That will attract people. Sure churches have to pay bills and take in money, however a church's aim should not be to make money. Shouldn't God come first??? As for research, I do get around pretty good. I haven't been to every church but I've seen my share. I have even run into a few bragging pastors in my time. Of course, I have a close friend who is a pastor that gets new cars and vacations paid for most years. There was even talk of getting a plane. That hasn't happened yet. They are expensive. Don't get me wrong. I have also seen churches that would make God proud how they help people and their communities. I could never believe in their beliefs but these people speak of God through their actions. They are teaching such wonderful lessons to many. Like everything in life, diversity abounds, so do the lessons sent to teach.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
Yes, it seems a lot of churches are more business than anything else.
• Canada
9 Aug 11
bird, I think you can get into arguments about the definition of "business". Some business practices are just plain sensible and it would be foolish for a church to ignore them. Some get a bit more questionable or don't fit well with the function of a church. For example, I think if you do market research and try to make the church more in keeping with what people say they want, you could well end up with something bland that doesn't attract converts or keep it's old members. How much research have you done on church finances?
@blue65packer (11826)
• United States
7 Aug 11
I would love to see churches be taxed! I know alot of churches they are saying they are doing humaniarian work and helping out the poor. You know they are not when you see how the minister lives and how elborate the church is! I never have believed that all the money that comes into churches goes to the needy or helping children in other countries! The pastor uses it for his to own greed or it goes into the church so they can get in more naive people in so they can get the money out of them! Most churches are not doing God's work at all! Churches should not be getting special treatment at all! It is also sad now a days you can't even trust your church for any kind of help! Spiritual or other! This is one of the many reason's I will not belong to a church ever again! I know God would not be pleased!
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
God is never pleased when anyone values physical things over spiritual things. It seems too many churches are doing just that. Perhaps you should reconsider belonging to a church. Sounds like they need someone just like you to shine the light on the truth. Of course, they would probably try to run you off but not before you made the point. Someone might even listen. Teach them even if it takes some drama. God would be very pleased. Remember God loves it when truth stares everyone in the face. It is God's work to place it out there for everyone to see. Be a part of that.
• Canada
9 Aug 11
blue, I suspect that you're generalizing at best. How much research have you put into this? Then I don't know what country you live in.
• Mexico
8 Aug 11
Hi bird: I have to say this is a very interesting discussion. In my opinion I think that a moderate option could work. That would be taxing churches but their taxes could be reduced even to 0 if they demonstrate to the government that they use their funds to create hospitals, help schools, help the poor, participate on programs that help the public which is actually the objective of taxes. ALVARO
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
9 Aug 11
Hey, I knew someone out there could come up with a plan! Now if we could just get them to put you in charge. Of course, you would have to be careful. There would be a lot of church folks after you!!
• Canada
9 Aug 11
Starsailover, do you trust the government and bureaucrats to decide what projects help the public and reduce the taxes accordingly? How much tax will go to paying bureaucrats (probably with little or no accountability) to access churches and make such decisions?
@RobtheRock (2433)
• United States
14 Aug 11
I sort of think that churches should be taxed. I agree that there are many churches that do something for the poor and others. But there are also many churches that do not. In the Black community, I've seen some of the smallest churches do their bit to help the community. What turns many Black non Christians off, is the Reverend Ike mentality of some preachers who drive around in Rolls Royces and Limosines while most of their parishioners can barely afford to feed their families. And yet, they continue to ask for more than the required 10%. Some of them even embarrass the congregation by making them come up to the front of the church and deposit money in the plate. I feel sorry for those who cannot give. Those churches should pay taxes, because they do nothing for the poor, but much for the "pimp" in the pulpit.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
14 Aug 11
I guess I've never seen people brought up in front of everyone to give. I bet that would be embarassing especially if your funds came up a bit short. You are right. Clearly this is not God's work. Maybe we should put them on TV when it's time for them to pay those taxes.
@whatrow (792)
• United States
13 Sep 11
Of course they should. Jesus said, "Render unto Ceaser what is Ceaser's."
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
14 Sep 11
Oh. so the Christians aren't living up to their holy book. Hmmm?? They should volunteer to pay taxes if they were to do the right thing. Very good, you really pulled the rabbit out of the hat on that one. I enjoyed it. This is kind of an old discussion. It would have been better to have come out 1 month ago thereby lots of people would have read it. Nonetheless. great comment! Who knows maybe a few will stop back and be surprised.
@zerd87 (301)
• Philippines
6 Aug 11
I think the church must not be taxed. Because its income comes from contributions of the members. Some churches has a limited members. Therefore it is not ideal to taxed it. Lots of its donations go to church activities in worshiping and helping individuals know God. They give also to the poor and needs help.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
There are some churches doing a Great job helping others. They should not be taxed. There are more churches than you realize sitting on a fortune as we speak. THey need to be taxed if they aren't going to help.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
9 Aug 11
Taxing does carry problems. I vote for a national sales tax. No paper work and can't avoid it.
• Canada
8 Aug 11
How does the government determine which churches are doing a great job and which are just accumulating wealth for taxation purposes? I'm sure there are some that try to do a good job but screw up. What about churches (or other religious groups) that are using their money to support questionable causes (pro-life, pro-choice, Palestinians, Israel, anything the government doesn't like)?
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
6 Aug 11
I agree church's need to help more. I don't know where you live but here pastors houses are the size of shoe box's. Here is my Belize and it is highly controversial- the govermt was never created to help people. That is what church's and charity's are for. I say stop All aid to people frankly we can not afford it right now. Are poor are all not thAt bad off 50% off people on government assistance have T.V and tons of other luxury's that if they cut they could afford whAt they need. What about family family can help them not a struggling goverment
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
7 Aug 11
You make lots of good points. USA does have a good safety net. If I had to be poor the USA is where I would want to be. I hear even now poor can get a free cell phone with some free minutes. You would think food and shelter would be all that was necessary.
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
7 Aug 11
I'm glad I could poin out a few flaws in the so called " under privileged " getting as much help as they do
• United States
6 Aug 11
No, I dont think churches should be taxed for many reasons. One being that the church do not sell taxable goods. Two, we rely on churches more than we realize. We depend on them to counsel, marry, bury, prayer, baptism, not to mention hospital visits. They are away from their families alot, so their families get the short end of the stick. " Many of them get out of their bed in the midnight hours to do whatever is required. Now, I dont believe that they should sell the word "on tape or DVD's books yes but not the word and if they do sell it should be small enough to recover the price for the tapes, dvd's or supplies that was purchase or for the price they paid. Last, I feel that the rich are the one that should be paying taxes and if that preacher happens to be rich then yes he should pay taxes not because he is a leader over a church but because he is rich and have to give back. However, if he has a pantry or sometype of community drive, or if he donate anything anywhere or service there should be a exemption for that seeing as that he can prove it.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
Oh, I didn't even consider money made on tapes, dvd's, and books. I bet they aren't all being sold at cost. You are right that the small community churches that are doing an outstanding job should never be taxed. Just like every tax return, they could have exemptions for those doing the job. Double the tax on those who don't.
• United States
6 Aug 11
As for as the books, I definitely believe that it belongs the who ever wrote it and it shouldn't interfere with taxes and etc. because it is theirs. It's just so much going on these days, but overall I believe the good and dedicated church leaders deserve it. Great topic by the way!
@chiyosan (30184)
• Philippines
13 Aug 11
yeah, i think they should be taxed too. :D
@dismalgrin (2604)
• United States
8 Aug 11
I agree with you. I mean so many churches ask for money and if they are asking for the money then they need to use that money in a responsible way according to the beliefs of their religion. If their religion is all about having the big church and the pastor with expensive clothes then they should be taxed because otherwise it's not fair to the people that pay taxes before paying the church. But for the churches that go out of their way to spend that money to help others they deserve to go without taxes because they are using that money to help people that have nothing.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
9 Aug 11
Yes, THat's how I see it too.
• India
10 Aug 11
Should the church take care of the poor? Who created the poor? Church or God? Do you expect me to take care of your child or is it your job? So, the church is living in a palace. And God? He is living in the biggest mansion. He is living in the mansion of absolute freedom, great unlimited power, omnipotence. And what does he do for the poor which he himself created? Zero. 50% of the world is poor. And the rest- most of them- are working like donkeys to earn their bread. Now you may argue that if it is not somebody's time to die, God will have them fed somehow. If this is true, then why should the church feed them? Let them somehow be fed? Oh, you will not judge God's actions. But why are you judging the church's actions? So some priests are living in million dollar homes. Now do not forget that the priests appointed workers to build that house and paid them. The workers got job opportunities. Should the church be taxed? Since everybody else is taxed, yes the church also should be taxed, but not for the reason that they are not feeding the poor. And if there exists a God, he ought to be heavily taxed because he lives in the greatest luxury.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
11 Aug 11
How little you really understand God and what is going on in this world. You are right. If God wants them alive, He will find a way to feed them. Perhaps my point is that God is Spiritual just like we are in our true natures. If churches are supposed to speak for God, the physical priorities of self wealth do not fit the bill. In spirituality,it is important to spread that. Helping the poor, many whose spirits are down, need help. Giving, helping, love and kindness defines who we are and who we choose to be. To help others, helps ourself. It is a good thing. We are here but to serve. Yes, God could make this world a utopia but that would defeat the real purpose of this world. Yes, many adversities are meant to be. You could not stop them if you tried. Still, it is our choice on what we choose in life. Mansions or helping people, Which has more value people or money??
@ebuscat (5935)
• Philippines
6 Aug 11
For me no they are not doing it because they might sad what has happen if they get it involve they taught they have a karma.
@bird123 (10632)
• United States
6 Aug 11
Yes, our actions do return to teach us what our actions really mean. This will happen for everyone. That's a good reason to do good deeds if one needs a reason at all.