When great disaster threatens, why do people stay?

@Awinds (2468)
United States
August 27, 2011 2:54am CST
(Last question like this - I promise!) I was just reading yesterday about a certain surfer in North Carolina. He has willingly ignored evacuation orders. In the back of his truck are two surf boards. He says the waves created by Hurricane Irene are a once in a lifetime opportunity that he is not going to miss! Other people want to stay so they can get photos and videos. Still more people want to stay to protect their property and possessions. Why do you think that when a natural disaster threatens, people stay? Thrills, photos and stuff is no good if one is dead! So what is that really makes people want to stick in danger areas? What really drives them to stay glued to their spot when most people are leaving? You would think the self preservation instinct would factor in there somewhere.
6 people like this
13 responses
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
28 Aug 11
Because of many reasons. It is their home. May have been for generations. Only home they have ever known. Many have no where else to go. And, yes, some are just down right demented. Maybe they just don't take it terribly seriously. And, it is our own right to chose when we die and how.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
28 Aug 11
Yes, a person should be able to chose. There are people that stay even though it is a forced evacuation. Like the old man who stayed during the valcano in northwestern US years ago. His chose to stay at his home.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
I suppose people can decide when and where they want to die. What do you think of forced evacuations though? When the government forces people to leave a dangerous place? Is that violating their right to chose when and how they die?
2 people like this
• United States
27 Aug 11
I would stay because unless I can move Every single record and VHS I own with me , I rather go down with the house! As for self preservation instinct? I don't have it in huge supply. I always thought it was cute that I could die naturally and not by my own hand! Now I'm a little better.I take care of myself because of my guy. But I still wouldn't want to leave all my stuff.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Aug 11
They are precious.It took 15 years to collect them all. Some are of things that will never happen again. and yes I rather just call it a day than try to re collect them. But then again I am Still a pessimist at heart. All of this would break my guy's heart but I am being truthful.
1 person likes this
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
That's quite an attachment to stuff! :) So you are really willing to give up your life for videos and records? Those must be some pretty important records and videos! :)
2 people like this
@estherlou (5015)
• United States
27 Aug 11
There will always be the thrillseakers and we sane ones just have to roll our eyes and shake our heads at them. LOL. But some people don't have anywhere to go, or the money to go, or are unwilling to leave everything they've ever known until they see for themselves how bad the threat is.
1 person likes this
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
The thrill seekers can be entertaining to those of use who have no desire to throw away our lives I suppose... :)
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
27 Aug 11
I would think that with property owners, they are afraid that looters would come and steal the stuff while they are away. They also think that if they are not there, and one of the windows was open, or the storm caused breakage like the window breaking and the rain coming in, that they would not get insurance. As for the photographers, could they not get in touch with a news agency who would make sure they are put in a place where there is less danger? Doing it just to put oneself in danger is not that good. I can understand the property owner, but not the thrill seeker or the photographer. There are such things as telescopic lens and the professionals have the proper equipment.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
I forgot about just after the storm - that does make sense. One's property will already be damaged and the last thing one needs to find one's remaining positions have been tampered with or even worse - stolen.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
28 Aug 11
There are always people who take advantage of natural disasters to line their pockets and when there is a disaster, the police often have too much to do and cannot be everyplace at once.
@dandan07 (1906)
• China
27 Aug 11
In my hometown, the Qiantang bore kill people very year. It is a natural phenomenon not a disaster, but sad things are always happen. Local people have set up a group to call people out of the river before the bore come. If the local people in the river, they will go out, but people who come from other place, in most case, do not listen to the call, and stay where they like. The bore is very strong, sometimes it may stronger than tunami. So when you find the bore comes, it is too late for you to escape. Also, some people will take photos for the bore, but most of them will choose a save place to do that. I think to many people, when great disaster threaten, because lack of knowledge about it, they choose to stay.
1 person likes this
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
That is a great example! Ignorance can get one killed - like in the case of foreigners and your home town!
1 person likes this
@jpso138 (7851)
• Philippines
28 Aug 11
Well there are a lot of reasons why people stay despite the fact that they face the danger of losing their lives. In our place most people that stay not because they are not afraid about the disaster but rather they do not have anywhere else to go. They also fear of losing their valuable property. We are a poor country and many people here are suffering. The last they want to do is lose their valuable positions. Some would even risk their lives just to recover certain items.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
Shifting countries can really change things. I suppose that when all you own is as stake and you don't have any other options, you will be prone to risk rather than lose everything.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
28 Aug 11
You'd think so, heh? People are interesting. I don't want to leave my home. I REALLY do not want to leave my home. Hurricane Irene is supposed to be hitting where I'm at in less than 2 hours. So far, we have not been ordered to evacuate. I'm hoping that we won't have to. I think I'm far enough inland that we may get a lot of very high winds and possibly some flooding. I'm not going anywhere but I'll tell you if they ordered us or even told us we should evacuate, I'd be finding another place to go regardless. My daughter who is down the road from me , lives right on the river. She is so so stubborn. I stopped there and asked her to please come to my place which is on a hill and we were safe during the last flood. She doesn't believe it'll be that bad. I hope she's right. She'll call me when the river is moving toward her house.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
I can understand not wanting to leave all that one has - all that is familiar. The case with your daughter is sticky. I do hope she is right - the good news is that I heard from someone in Boston that the hurricane has lost a lot of steam. Let us hope that is still the case.
@_sketch_ (5742)
• United States
27 Aug 11
People don't always have the means to leave. I think that this is the number one reason. They may not have money or transportation to just up and leave and if they did, they may not have any place to stay. Not everyone has family they can stay with and hotels can be very costly, especially when all your stuff gets ruined by a natural disaster. "You would think the self preservation instinct would factor in there somewhere." Ironically, I think that this instinct may be the very thing that leads people to stay in a lot of cases. People are scared and they don't know what to do; don't know where to go; so they stay. We are all very attached to our houses and belongings. We have build our entire lives on physical possessions. Not only do we want to protect our belongings, but also our city, our neighborhood. People care about these things deeply, and we protect what we care about. Some people not only have their home, but a business, farmland, etc. If we lose our source of income, then our entire life changes. These physical things that aren't truly important when compared to our life, are very important when we realize that it means a huge change and shift into the unknown. Change is scary. I would say that the self-preservation instinct is definitely coming into play here. Another possible reason is that they may be staying with the intention of helping others who have chosen to stay. The cases you mentioned in staying for the thrills are pretty extreme and this is probably the last thing on most people's minds. However, it makes a bit of sense. We all are constantly seeking a thrill. It's really just the intensity that differs. In the case of the surfer, I guess that he has decided that if he's gonna die, he's gonna go out having the time of his life. Whether he makes it or not, he could be a legend.
@_sketch_ (5742)
• United States
28 Aug 11
Thank you and thanks for best response. I just try to put myself in other's shoes.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
I never thought of that. The fact that people might not have the resources to leave is a very good and valid point - especially with what has been going in on the last few years. That is a great angle on the self preservation instinct. I suppose that really makes a lot of sense. To preserve what we know and love. To chose the familiar over the unknown - it does make a lot of sense. You have a really rational response here. :)
• United Arab Emirates
28 Aug 11
Well it's because they don't want to miss the thrill of overcoming and actually seeing such phenomenon. Probably they have not yet experienced loosing a loved one from a disaster, others because they have worked so hard for the things they posses right now. Saving and preserving once life should be the most important thing to consider right now.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
You have a point. It is hard to abandon all that one is and has just to have a shot at preserving only one's life. It comes down to which is more important: living on or trying to protect what one has.
• United States
27 Aug 11
People have a deep connection with the land and the place they live in. It's because of the thrill or the excitement. They actually think that they'll be okay. Also, there are those who have seen these things before and know that because they're still alive and well, they'll be okay. There are a lot of reasons and stories behind why people want to stay. I've never had to evacuate, I'm thankful for that, and ultimately, I know I'll be safe.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
27 Aug 11
I am also curious why other people are so willing to brace the dangers and ignore calls for evacuation and concerns of their fellow people. The local thing to do is evacuate and escape becuase any means of damage and casualty is possible. However, people do stay for a lot of reasons. Perhaps it is money or the unyielding faith that everything in the end will be fine. That, in my opinion, will be somewhat outrageous positive thinking since not everything will be - there are still chances of mishaps and danger. I agree with the property angle, However, there should be a fine line for a person when he is considering his living and his existence. Everything can be built from scratch except the loss of a human life. If people manage to temp fate and live, it's good. But a lost of human life is another story. The situation of great disasters bring the best and worst in people. Some of them might include perseverance or stupidity but we all make our decisions as an individual.
1 person likes this
@Rick1950 (1575)
• Lima, Peru
1 Sep 11
The guy going to the beach because of the big waves is quite imprudent. Also the people which want to take photos and videos are like so. They have no idea how dangerous could be such events. Maybe I would have more comprehension about people who stay because of their houses. On the other hand much people have not option to go somewhere because of the lack of mediums. Of course, if the land will be flooded you need to go away as soon as possible.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
1 Sep 11
Those who have property and no where else to flee - I can relate to them. They want to do all they can to prevent their life and life's work from going down the drain in a massive storm. However the thrill seekers and wanna be famous photographers are not as deserving of sympathy.
• Philippines
28 Aug 11
I'm not sure but when the typhoon "ondoy" hits Philippines our subdivision was soaked in heavy flood.. we remain because our house stood still we just have to climb in our roof and some of our valuables are still inside.. taking picture or videos are for remembrance hahaha.. for us to remember the event
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
28 Aug 11
Well I guess staying in that case makes sense if you're house is still standing! It is just people who are facing a very powerful, will-probably-destroy-alot storm and chose to stay that baffle me!