How Long?

@p1kef1sh (45681)
April 18, 2012 6:09am CST
Recently I have had cause to think deeply about my own mortality. We often make glib comments about death either accepting or not. I did read though that within 50 years people might routinely live to be 200 years old! I am pretty sure that I would not want to live that long although I suppose that it all depends on my health, fitness and especially my brain capabilities. Would you like to live to be 200?
8 people like this
25 responses
• United States
18 Apr 12
No...200 years old would be a tad too old. I will be 73 next week and I already get tired sometimes.. According to "The Tomb Clock" I will live until I am 92 years old!! LOL Check it out http://www.tombclock.com/
4 people like this
• United States
18 Apr 12
Good for you p1key. OOps sorry BarBaraPrz you could try it again....
3 people like this
@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
21 Apr 12
Hmm I am supposed to live to 2039, that would make me 83. Funny my brother recons I have 30 years left..
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
I have until 2051 according to TTC. Prior to my recent surgery it was 2017 according to the Dr!
4 people like this
@GreenMoo (11834)
18 Apr 12
Just because scientists and doctors can make something happen, that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.
3 people like this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
Absolutely. Doomsday might be just around the corner and it might even be celebrated as a "scientific breakthrough"!
2 people like this
@ryanong (9665)
• Vietnam
19 Apr 12
You are right, GreenMoo...^^We should follow the natural life.
@BarBaraPrz (45570)
• St. Catharines, Ontario
18 Apr 12
Only if money didn't matter, and everyone was at peace. I doubt that people living to 200 would be routine for everyone, just the "elite" who can afford premium health care. Who would want to endure 200 years of poverty or pain?
2 people like this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
The article didn't specify who would make it to 200. I do agree that all those extra years of pain would be awful.
3 people like this
@thesids (22180)
• Bhubaneswar, India
18 Apr 12
hi P1kef1sh 200 years is a long time and I am not in my best of healths. I am also unemployed and stay at home (due to ill health) and during the past few years since my confinement I have found that relationships, friends and many other things change if such a thing happens. Considering the situations I am in... well, 200 years does seem to be quite a long lone battle. Things might have been different if I was healthy or even this 200 years thing came with a guarentee of great health, vigor, employment and of course... ample opportunities to learn and live.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
I think that how long we live is affected by many different factors. If tyou spend a lot of time at home already another 150 plus years of the same seems an awfully long time!
2 people like this
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
18 Apr 12
for me it would depend on whether or not I can keep all my mental faculties and not be senile. thats the one thing I dread. I love to know what I am doing and to live life as fully as I can.It could be exciting to see what is in store for us in many years to come.
1 person likes this
18 Apr 12
i would love to live forever but always look the age i am now, or maybe 10 years younger
3 people like this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
There's another problem. We'd probably look 200 too! LOL.
3 people like this
18 Apr 12
well this is why i would love the aging process to halt when we get to a certain age, but that's not gonna happen is it? but if i could live forever i would want to stay looking the age i was 10 years ago and no go any older..oh i can wish
3 people like this
• Philippines
18 Apr 12
i dont want to live for 200 years because i know that not everybody lives that long, and eventually my loved ones will die. i dont want to be the one left and they are all gone. i dont want to feel that im along just because i wanted to live for 200 years. i want the normal thing.
3 people like this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
I agree although I suppose that if you live to be 200 so will they.
3 people like this
@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
21 Apr 12
Hmmm so have I. I am only 55, well nearly 56 but I am told that I am going to live for another 30 odd years and I am not sure I want to. What is the point if the quality of life is terrible. I currently try to live just day to day and not think about the future because it scares me too much. I am told I have rheumatoid arthritis and that is one of my all time nightmares. I have images in my head of twisted fingers that cannot function, not to mention the pain levels. I try not to think about it and I minimise how much pressure I put on my fingers so I do not get sore joints but I have no idea if I will get worse or not. The unknown is scary. I am already ill with chronic fatigue that no one knows anything about and cannot treat let alone cure and I think that the option of euthanasia should be allowed. I would like to go out at my own choosing. But live to 200? No. I believe that the future will be a nasty place and even if I was healthy with everything working fine I have no wish to see things get worse than they are now. Society writes us off at 50 unless we are rich and can pay our own way. If you are lucky you stay in your job as long as possible but if you lose it and you are over 50 you have no chance of getting another one. If you are rich, fine, if not then you face a life of poverty as well as growing ill health so why would anyone want to live like that.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
21 Apr 12
I try to think positively about life and whilst I have had my share of ill health recently I am trying hard to see the beauty of the world and not the ugliness - all of which is man made! But I wouldn't want to live to be 200. I suppose that I have a curiosity about what the world will be like but no matter what the medical progress I just can't see me wanting to still be around. Let younger people worry about it all!
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
18 Apr 12
hi pikey well I am 85 and in fairly good health, yes if I could stay at least this healthy although I now use a walker sure why not to 200 as it would be interesting to see how the world would change and hopefully for the better.Like you it depends if ]I could keep my mind as healthy as it is now and keep myself healthy.If I became like my roommate no no way she has become senile and its so sad as she was so smart a few years back. from hatley.
1 person likes this
@ellie333 (21016)
18 Apr 12
With you on this one Hatley as long as I had my mental health and was physically fit except for the usual aches and pains of ageing I would love to see what it would be like in 200 years. Huggles. Ellie :D
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
I think that it all boils down to how healthy we are Hatley. I would hate to be infirm and just drag out my days for the sake of it.
• Australia
20 Apr 12
I would love to live for forever, but not feeling the way I feel now. I do take comfort from the fact that I didn't expect to get even this far, and now it looks like I might have another 5 years or so of ever-decreasing quality of life; I will likely even make my three score and ten. On the other hand, I am sorry I bred a child, since I wouldn't want to be him or his children in the world I see coming in the near future, so what would be the point of long life if the world is likely to be a fairly nasty place to live in? No, much as I fantasise about what I could do with another 150 years odd (assuming better health than I now don't enjoy), I think my plan to take early retirement once the quality of life becomes too negative is the right one. I can't afford Switzerland, probably, but there are people who can help in finding a painless retirement technique, so .... Lash
@p1kef1sh (45681)
20 Apr 12
When I was a boy I never thought to live longer than 42. A random number I know. But I have managed 12 years past that and although the old body is now starting to collapse a little and I wonder if I will make it to 60 at times; I do have hope for the future of our children. My daughter is 23 and goes off each morning to work cheerfully (well mostly with a whistle) and is loving life. Perhaps as we get older we become fixated on just living and forget how to live. I don't know. But I am certain that I have enjoyed most of my life and don't think that the idea of another 140+ years has any appeal at all.
• Australia
21 Apr 12
Well, I imagine that being a mother you have a lot more invested in your children. I frankly couldn't care less about either my genes or my name going forward, it's simply not important to me. I do, however, think that the current generations should seriously consider whether or not to have children considering the future we have bequeathed them. You and I are the same age, and we could hardly have been expected to see where the world was heading, at least not as graphically as we can now, so we have some excuse. But current generations see it daily, and it's going to get much worse. Climate change is going to have serious effects on my grandchildren's lives (assuming my boy has children); the zealous Right is coming to power in many countries, our own included, and their agenda could be almost deliberately designed to create massive poverty; the refugee problem is only in its infancy, nd it's already causing huge problems world wide, how much more so once water levels begin to rise significantly. And so on. If I may be so bold as to quote from one of my own songs: I could talk about the ozone, and the salty water holes, But my sorrow at the passing of her beauty grieves my soul, [b]And I see my children’s children like the ancient Bushman clans Scratching life from dirt and rocks and shifting sands.[/b] In the language of the wise it’s said the word for world was forest, A word that we don’t use much anymore. For a time of greed and blindness turned the forests into deserts, And the word for world has changed beyond recall. Lash
@alottodo (3056)
• Australia
20 Apr 12
Look at you...grandpa-lash and you p1KeF1sh one would think you are very old! but you are not so! I never thought I would make to the year 2000 but here I Am 12 years later! and you know what? I Am a happy person I don't give up on life! and grandpa how can you be sorry to have a child! that child is the future your own genes passed on from now to eternity...I have 4 children and I do not regret having them...what happen to them in the future is for them to figure out! I live my life[ and still do] in a changing world which I embrace every day!
@alottodo (3056)
• Australia
19 Apr 12
I personally would not mind living that long Why? I often find my self thinking what the world would be like in 50 years time! if what I think is going to happen come to pass...I Am just curious I think but it would be nice to be there to see the changes in the world and people...but if I Am to live that far I would like to be fairly healthy and sound of mine and of course not to live in poverty!...I guess living to 200 in the future is quite possible may be in the next 40 to 50 years or may be sooner...since I was born [ and I Am just 67] science have advanced incredibly fast and of course there is still much more to come so who knows what the future will bring? the possibilities are endless and lest be honest the human race is still in a very primitive stage there is still a lot to learn!
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
There IS a lot to learn but I am not sure that I want to live another 146 years to experience it. LOL.
@RawBill1 (8531)
• Gold Coast, Australia
21 Apr 12
I could handle 200 years as it would give me more opportunity to do all the things in life that I want to achieve, like travelling to plenty of different parts of the globe. I would want to remain at least as good as I am health wise for much of that time in order to want to do it though. There is not much use in living long term if your body is not up to doing much. How are you feeling? Recovering well?
@p1kef1sh (45681)
21 Apr 12
There's the rub Bill. It's only worthwhile if we have the health and vitality to enjoy it. I am not convinced that we will. Just keeping people alive becasue we can doesn't seem to me to be much of a deal. I am making slow progress thanks. Plenty of aches and pains but rhe scars are healing. I am exhausted much of the time because I struggle to sleep on my back - I am unable to sleep on my sides becasue either the scars hurt or my muscles pull at the scars and they hurt again. Plus I have been diagnosed with a few other less serious body issues. Irritating but not debilitating. Keep smiling is my motto! Mostly!!! LOL.
@RawBill1 (8531)
• Gold Coast, Australia
22 Apr 12
Glad to hear that you are making some progress. I do know the feeling of not being able to sleep well. I am still not comfortable sleeping after my broken collar bone on January 1st. The way that I have laid my whole life to get to sleep is just not comfortable anymore, so unless I am really exhausted, it takes me a while to get to sleep. Very annoying! Yep, keep smiling! That's the way!
• United States
19 Apr 12
Definitely not. To be honest, I don't even want to see 100. I think the prospect of people living that long is dangerous for humanity itself. Even with an average life expectancy of--what is it now? 75? 80? Even with this shorter amount, people are still taking their time here for granted. Dragging the average human lifespan out even longer would encourage people to be less productive overall and put less influence on how beautiful life can really be. For example...if I had two weeks to get something done, I'd hurry and complete it. If that same project had a new deadline of a month or two, I might slack off a bit, waiting until the last week or so to even get started. This is how most people work...and waiting until the "last minute" simply doesn't work for life in general, since you have no control over when it abruptly ends. With a life expectancy of 200, you might see people waiting to fulfill personal dreams, putting less emphasis on keeping in touch with those who matter, etc., until it's too late. On a lasting note, people are so materialistic that I don't think anyone would want to live that long unless we could also prolong physical youth and attraction. Basic human biology follows its own course...all people hit puberty within a few years of each other, later on our skin loses its battle with the sun and the elements and creates wrinkles and spots, women stop being able to bear children around the same time as the rest of the women, and by 70, you've reached a point where your body systems will start to deteriorate and fail, and appearance-wise, you look just about what you will look like until you die. Naturally, our purpose in life is over at a certain point; trying to enforce a longer lifespan will have devastating consequences for both human culture and what it means to be human.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
20 Apr 12
I am in agreement. I firmly believe that we get from life what we put into it. Unfortunately many people, especially in the West, equate success with money and fame. The ownership of things seems more important than anything else. As I age, and if your profile age is correct I have a daughter your age, I have come to learn that there is more wealth in friendship and family then any amount of Mercedes cars or Rolex watches. They gild the lily, but the lily is pretty enough not to need these things. If we can look back on live where we have given love and hopefully received it, then frankly I don't mind when I go, but without my health and vitality sooner rather than later.
@shrmanoj (382)
19 Apr 12
It depends on me or my health. I don't want to live more than 50 years.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
50 is quite young. I am 54 and not ready to die just yet!
@ryanong (9665)
• Vietnam
19 Apr 12
Normally people will hope they live till 70~80 years. Why don't you want to live more than 50 years. 50 years are still short...
• Russian Federation
18 Apr 12
i do not want to live untill 200 years lol i don not even want to be old. uyou begin to look miserable unbeaytiful. i do not want to do something myself. i think i am too little to decide something myself. i mut have somebody who tell me wthat to do. lol i don't want to get old. ~best wishes :)
1 person likes this
@p1kef1sh (45681)
18 Apr 12
Beauty is only skin deep. It is what you are inside that counts.
2 people like this
• Russian Federation
18 Apr 12
aww then i want to live longer.On this hand of view
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
18 Apr 12
victoria I am 85 and my picture is on myh facebook account I am the one with white hair, and I do not look horrible so go peek at me.old age does not have to be awful at all.I have f un here on mylot. I don 'think I look miserable or unbeautiful at all.I am hatley here and Patsie Hatley on facebook. a lot of older people 'do not look horrible at all.
1 person likes this
@Rosekitty (19368)
• San Marcos, Texas
18 Apr 12
Well now if we knew we were living to the age of 200, I think our bodies wouldn't get as old as they are now..well mine at least..haha...so maybe i would still look like a young lady at 100..heeheee..of course it depends on my lifestyle and what i would be doing at that age??
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
LOL. You look like a young lady now Rosie.
@veejay19 (3589)
• India
19 Apr 12
50 years is still a long way off and in the condition that i am in physically there is no way i will last that long nor do i want to.There is so much strife and stress in modern living that the prospect of living 200 years would be like having to face rigourous life imprisonment in jail. I will be very glad to exit this world when my time comes.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
I am sorry that you feel ready to die now. I hope that things become a little better for you.
@maezee (41997)
• United States
18 Apr 12
If I could live to be 200 years old and HEALTHY I totally would - of course! But the thing is I would imagine at the ripe age of 200, you would be falling apart physically and mentally.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
I presume that if they can keep you alive that long then they would also be able to keep your menatl and physical capacities up. If not it's too horrible to imagine!
@ryanong (9665)
• Vietnam
19 Apr 12
I don't want to live till 200 years old because it is really hard to have friends for sharing at that age. If i don't have much money at that time, it will be the big problem also.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
The retirement age woud have to be a lot higher or we'd never be able to fund our lives.
@jemzchix (116)
• Philippines
19 Apr 12
I would not want to live until 200 years old. my gosh, i would really feel all left out, with all my colleagues already gone. i'd be the only one who's still alive, and that could be a bit lonely at times. i believe that not even the presence of your next generation could suffice the loneliness. it's more of like a constant longing to the people you were with. i believe that dying is giving chance for another human to experience life, while we let go of what we have went through... so, living up to 80-90 years old would be long enough for me..
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
Presumably your colleagues would live that long too so you wouldn't be entirely bereft. But would you still be able to work at that age?
• France
19 Apr 12
I have way too many interests, next year I'm studying mechanical engineering, although honestly I'd like to study all kinds of engineering, and that's not to say I wouldn't add design and business to my studies. I enjoy programming and photo-editing in my free time (when I'm actually supposed to be working). I have to say, I would love to live till 200 to accomplish all these things, although as you said, it would all depend on what my health is like.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
19 Apr 12
My fathr was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering here in the UK. Enjoy your course and life!