New Restriction to Sell A House

@aeiou78 (3445)
Malaysia
September 1, 2012 9:38pm CST
There is a new proposal to restrict the home owners to sell their houses if they own them less than 10 years at my place. The intention of this proposal is to slow down the inflation especially the prices of the properties as houses, condominiums, apartment, shop houses and so on. I personally do not agree to this proposal because I believe it will make the inflation worse. What about the opinions from all of you?
4 responses
@jkct02 (2874)
• Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
2 Sep 12
If the supply of new house and second hand house in the market is aplenty, a restriction on the selling of house with less than 10 years ownership should help to curtail the speculative buying and selling that makes the housing price bubble unrealistically high. I believe the new proposal is for the purpose of lowering the housing price. We still have adequate supply of housing to meet the demand but it is the high price that makes the people can not afford to buy. This restriction could take out most, if not all, the speculators' interest in making fast money in the property market.
@aeiou78 (3445)
• Malaysia
5 Sep 12
Restricting property owners to sell their properties within 10 years will not be so practical. I suggest the relevant government to classify certain type of properties as control properties and certain town areas as control areas. At the same time, all of the prospective buyers or owners must apply to ensure their are qualified to own those properties. This should be the better way to control the inflation.
@jkct02 (2874)
• Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
5 Sep 12
What I mean as a restriction on the sale of properties with ownership of less than certain years is that we should have some kind of measures to make sure that property sellers do not get to profit from the activities of buying and selling properties for the sole aim of making a profit. In other words, we have to stop the property market speculation to curb the artificial inflation of property prices. But we have already had a real property gains tax (RPGT) introduced in 2012 that applies to property sold less than five years from its purchase. Property disposed off less than two years after purchase will incur RGPT of 10% while those sold between two and five years after will incur 5% RPGT. http://blog.intproperties.com/1098/update-on-the-malaysia-real-property-gain-taxrpgt-budget-2012/ So the new proposal of ownership of less than 10 years is just to extend the original 5 years to another 5 years that makes it 10 years in total. The RPGT does provide a RM10,000.00 exemption or 10% of the net gains, whichever is higher for an individual, so there is still profit to be made in there. The law just controls that gain within reasonable levels. Moreover, genuine property owner who disposes their property can apply for exemption of RPGT under the following circumstances ie. a) one-in-a-lifetime exemption for Malaysian individuals, b) disposal by way of gift ie between parent and child, husband and wife etc. I just hope that the measures are good enough to contend the high price trends of properties in Malaysia. Taking away the speculative factor, perhaps the real culprits for the steep rise in property prices are actually due to the high building material cost, transport cost, labor cost and the many other high costs that have also made our daily living expenses getting more and more expensive. We need more than just a few changes in government policies to combat the ills. We will need a big change in the policy makers itself.
@yspmyl (3435)
• Malaysia
2 Sep 12
I think this is good in order to protect those people who can only afford to buy 1 or 2 houses, and it will not affect much for these people, but for people who have a lot of monies and always buy and sell their houses or shop lots will definitely make the property's price roared up. This restriction is only to make sure the properties price will not increase too fast. So, I presume you are one of those property tycoon that buy and sell and earn plenty of money from there. Am I right? Haha, just joking, no hard feeling. Have a nice day
@aeiou78 (3445)
• Malaysia
5 Sep 12
Instead of restricting people from selling their properties within the 10 years, I shall propose the relevant government to allow only a person to own a type of property within a certain hot area. For instance, within the capital of Kuala Lumpur, a person is allowed to own a shoplot, a residential home and so on. Other than those areas which are not classified as hot areas, this restriction will not be applied. I believe my proposal will be more effective and more workable than restricting the property owners to sell their properties within 10 years.
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
2 Sep 12
How will it make inflation worse? It seems the purpose is to block people from buying houses without intending to live in them. If they block people who buy houses just for resale, wouldn't that lower the price since there's noone in the middle jacking up the price?
@aeiou78 (3445)
• Malaysia
5 Sep 12
The inflation of the property will be worse due to the high demand in the high demand market. When this new rule is implemented, there will be less available properties which are matured to be sold in the market at that time. Of course, with the limited available properties and high demand in the market, I am sure the cost of the property will be very much higher.
@Devilova (5392)
• Indonesia
2 Sep 12
How about someone with a bad debts? Did bank could take the house? It could be used too to break the rules.
@aeiou78 (3445)
• Malaysia
5 Sep 12
I do hope the relevant authority will consider about this matter when they really want to implement it. For me, the relevant authority must consider to allow those who have the financial problem to appeal for selling their properties within this restricted period.