English QUESTION???????

United Arab Emirates
November 22, 2012 7:19am CST
Hi guys today i was confused in my class in the university when i saw this that Two and Two make four. And the s/es is not used with make but when we say slow and steady wins the race. Then s/es is used with the win . Can you tell me reason why?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
22 Nov 12
'Two and two' represents a plural quantity. You could replace 'two and two' with 'they' and the sentence would still be grammatically correct as in: "Two is a numerical entity and is therefore singular. Two twos are two 'things', and therefore plural. They make four (which is another singular entity)." "Slow and steady" are adjectives and attributes of a single (unstated) thing, representing 'that which wins the race', so the verb is in the singular. If you were to rephrase the saying using two nouns, "Slowness" and "steadiness", you would have to use the plural form of the verb.
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
22 Nov 12
Perhaps it should be explained that numerical words can be used in two different ways: 1) as adjectives describing the quantity or plurality of a number of objects 2) as nouns indicating a group of objects, in which case 'two', 'four', '[a] hundred', [a] thousand' and so on are all singular. "Two vehicles are on the bridge" ('two' is an adjective describing 'vehicles') "Two is a quantity very often found in nature." ('two' in this case is a singular noun and the name of a quantity).
• United Arab Emirates
28 Nov 12
Hi owlwings!! I really agree with your answer and it convinced me too and you are 100 % right. I would like to say thanx to you.
• Philippines
22 Nov 12
I thinks what they mean by two and two makes four is that two plus two equals 4, easy as that. It's like counting one to two on your left and hand and then counting one to two on your right hand, you count all of them it's four. As to the other case, the s/es thing, that I don't get, can you please explain or elaborate it further?? :)
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
22 Nov 12
The OP is wondering why the plural verb is used in the first sentence but the singular used in the second sentence. It is because the word "two" is a singular noun and two of them become the subject of a plural verb in "Two and two make four". It the second sentence, "slow" and "steady" are adjectives which are taking the place of a noun which is omitted. It is this "slow and steady 'thing'" which is the subject of the verb, so the 'thing' and the verb are singular.
• Philippines
22 Nov 12
I see, I thought he was asking about mathematical thing. LOL hahaha XD
@celticeagle (158876)
• Boise, Idaho
22 Nov 12
You already know how to make most nouns into plurals just by adding an -s at the end of the word. There are plenty of words that do not follow the rule, however. Here is an easy case to remember: If a word ended in -s, -z, -x, -sh, or -ch, add -es to the end. Examples: dress - dresses; fizz - fizzes; fox - foxes; wish - wishes; watch - watches. When a noun ends in -o, you also have to add -es. Examples: hero - heroes; tomato - tomatoes Exceptions to the rule: studio, piano, kangaroo, zoo, buffalo, cargo, motto, . Just add -s to these words. If a noun ends in a consonant plus the letter "y", change the "y" to "i" and add -es. Examples: city - cities; country - countries When a noun ends in -f or -fe, you change the "f" to "v" and add -es. Examples: knife - knives; half - halves; scarf - scarves Here is one that always gave me trouble. I hope this makes it easier for you! Sometimes a singular noun ends in -um or -on. To make it a plural, change the -um to an -a. Examples: curriculum - curricula; phenomenon - phenomena How about nouns that end in -ex or -ix? To make them plural, change that ending to -ices. Examples: vertex - vertices; index - indices Nouns that end in -us become plurals by changing the ending to -i. Example: stimulus - stimuli Some nouns are always plural, but do not end in "s". Examples: cattle, police, people.
@gunsing (142)
• Indonesia
22 Nov 12
I think it's because the first one is scientific language; I mean language that we use to read "scientific stuff"
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
22 Nov 12
Not true. See my explanations below.