A new bank fee
By Porcospino
@Porcospino (31365)
Denmark
January 21, 2013 4:54pm CST
One of the banks in my country was introduced a new fee. If you withdraw money at the counter instead of using an ATM it costs $7 each time. This new rule has lead a lot of discussions in my country. Some people think that it is unfair that they have to pay $7 to withdraw their own money and some people think that it is okay (the employee who works at the counter needs a salary and it much more expensive for the bank when you decide to ask an employee for help instead of using an ATM)
The new fee is not going to affect me, because I always use an ATM, but it is going to affect the people who don't use ATMs. There are still some people from my grandmother's generation who don't use ATMs. They withdraw money at the counter instead and they will have to pay the new fee. Some of them find it hard to get used to a debit card or a credit card and they prefer to ask the employees for help.
What do you think about this fee? Do you think it is okay that you have to pay when you withdraw money at the counter since it is more expensive for the bank?
1 person likes this
12 responses
@Kashmeresmycat (6369)
• United States
21 Jan 13
I think that's awful..period. I'm one of those "grandma generation" people as you call them and I do use a debit card. I never use the ATM because of security reasons and I don't want to be robbed.
I use the debit card all the time and only go to the bank once every 2 months. When I go, it's to get a roll of quarters for my laundry at my apartment, and I will get cash at the same time. I don't go in and out of the bank all the time and if I had to pay a fee to do this I would find a bank that didn't charge.
I still think it's awful for anyone to have to pay this fee. I hope it doesn't catch on here, that's for sure. We pay enough out in fee's and bills now and barely have enough to live on now. 
I use the debit card all the time and only go to the bank once every 2 months. When I go, it's to get a roll of quarters for my laundry at my apartment, and I will get cash at the same time. I don't go in and out of the bank all the time and if I had to pay a fee to do this I would find a bank that didn't charge.
I still think it's awful for anyone to have to pay this fee. I hope it doesn't catch on here, that's for sure. We pay enough out in fee's and bills now and barely have enough to live on now. 1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
22 Jan 13
A lot people in my country have the same thoughts as you and they have have decided to find a different bank. They are very angry about the fee. So far only one bank has introduced that kind of fee, but the other banks might do the same thing in the future. They probably think that they can force people to use the ATMs if they introduce that kind of fee, but they have started to lose some of their customers instead. They are not too worried about that, because they are very popular (or used to be popular before they introduced this fee) and they have a lot of customers.
1 person likes this
@Kashmeresmycat (6369)
• United States
22 Jan 13
I feel sorry for the older generation of people that are not working and have a hard time fending for themselves. They are usually the one's who are the hardest hit. As the saying goes "And the rich get richer.."...I see no reason in the world to start charging a fee other than making more money. What a shame, and shame on them. 
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
23 Jan 13
I read an interview with one of the people from the bank, and he said: "We are probably going to lose some customers, but we don't care about that, because in the end we will benefit from this fee"
Unfortunately this fee is just one example and they have also introduced a couple of other fees. It is the big news story in my country at moment. I hope that the other banks aren't to copy the idea.
@Sreekala (34312)
• India
22 Jan 13
I think it is unfair to charge extra money for withdrawing our own money from the counter. I don’t understand the intention behind the new rule. Are they wanted to avoid the rush in counter? Here in our place no such rule. However, I have seen that more ATM Centers are available. I felt withdrawing money from ATM is easier for customers. Still there is some disadvantages, sometimes the cash do not come out but it will deduct from the account then the customers should rush into the near by branch to sort out this problem. Many ATM centres are available but many are lacking stock of cash. However, here in this place the people more interested to withdraw money from ATM as there is no time frame, most of the ATM are working for 24 hours.
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
22 Jan 13
I think that they simply want to save money. If few people withdraw money from the counter they would be able to fire some of the employees and they would spend less money on salaries. I think that they are trying to "force" people to use the ATMs by introducing that kind of fee, because many people don't want to pay the fee.
I agree with you about the ATMs. Sometimes there are problems and we don't get money or the machine swallows the credit card. That happened to my mother-in-law this week and she had to get a new credit card. Sometimes the machine runs out of cash and we are unable to get cash, but on the other hand it is a big advantage that we are able to use the ATMs 24 hours a day and we don't have to worry about the opening hours of the bank.
@maximax8 (31042)
• United Kingdom
31 Jan 13
I usually use an ATM machine to withdraw money but there is a daily limit. I need to ask for my money at the counter if it is more than the allowed amount of money. I think a $7 fee to get your own money from a bank counter is crazy. Old people that are retired typically don't like electric machines and prefer to deal with a friendly person like a banking assistant. It is the young folk that like Internet banking and ATM machines. I feel sorry for the old folk that like to speak and deal with a bank clerk. Maybe these old people will change bank account. Vote with your feet if your bank no longer suits you. A switching service can set up a new bank account and then the customer can be happy with his or her new bank account.
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
14 Feb 13
That was also one of things that I thought about when I heard about this new fee. Some people from the older generation don't like to use the ATMs and they would have to pay this fee. The bank wants to "force" people to use the ATMs, but some people don't want to do that and I think it is unfair that they have to pay $7 each time they want to withdraw their own money. The bank that introduced this fee has a lot of customers, btu their customers have started to disappear. Last time I read about it in newspaper it said that they lose 10 customers per hour at the moment because a lot of people won't accept the new fee and other new things they have introduced.
@bhanusb (5709)
• India
29 Jan 13
But in our country it is reverse. We can withdraw money from the bank counter without any extra fee. But we have to pay some fees for using ATM. I think in your country banks are encouraging people to use ATM. If people gather in the bank counter to withdraw and deposit money the banks have to bear some pressure. I think ATM is a modern system.
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
14 Feb 13
Yes, that is true. That want to encourage people to use the ATMs instead of withdrawing money from the counter. If few people withdraw money from the counter they will be able to fire some of the employess and that way they would be able to save money on the salaries. In the past when were no ATMs and you needed personal assistance from one of the employees when you wanted to withdraw money. Today the ATMs have made it possible to withdraw money when the bank is closed and I think that is one of the big advantages about that. Of course there are also problems sometimes and every once in a while we hear about the ATM scams.
@yanzalong (19091)
• Indonesia
26 Jan 13
That is too expensive fee. They may take all their money and move to other banks which do not charge high fee. In my country, certain banks charge a little fee if people use ATM.
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
28 Jan 13
I also think that the fee is too expensive. Many of their customers have already started to disappear and I don't blame them. At the moment the other banks haven't introduced that kind of fee, but I am afraid that they will copy the idea in the future. In my country we can use the ATMs for free during the opening hours in our own bank, but if we use them after the bank is closed we have to pay a fee. If we choose a use a different bank we always pay a fee. I don't remember how much we have to pay, but it is definately less the $7.
@tkonlinevn (6427)
• Vietnam
29 Jan 13
I don't think that the bank will be expensive when they keep our money. They get our money because they believe that they can get profits from them. Why I must pay fee when I would like to withdraw my money?
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
6 Feb 13
That is a good point. That is also one of things that many of the customers didn't like about this new idea. It is their money and they think that it is unfair that they have to pay $7 each time they want to withdraw their own money. I also think that the idea sounds unfair. The new idea is not going to affect me directly because I always use the ATMs instead of withdrawing money inside the bank, but the fee is going to affect the customers who prefer personal assistance inside the bank and I don't support the idea. I think that the bank wants to save money by firimg some of the employees inside the bank..
@00fear (3216)
• United States
22 Jan 13
The bank that I am a member of right now in my country, doesn't charge any fees to get money in the counter nor money in their atm's. Although in the atm's that doesn't belong to them they charge fees and also started charging a monthly fee for having a checking account. Before the bank that I belong to was sold, it used to be free "for life" for having both, checking and savings account. I don't think its fair because it is our money in the first place. Why are we getting charge, just for asking the bank teller that we need money? Lol, they try to make any excuse to charge people for now a days.
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
25 Jan 13
Many of the customers in that bank think that it is wrong to ask them to pay a fee each time they want to withdraw their own money and the customers have started to disappear from the bank. They have also introduced another rule that causes a lot of discussions. They want to introduce a fee for the bank account just like you described. The other banks in my country don't have the kind of fee at least not at the moment, but I am afraid that they are going to copy this idea and see it as a way to make extra money.
@lynboobsy11 (11343)
• Philippines
24 Jan 13
I think it is unfair, since they withdrawing their money on where they deposited their money. I know some ATM machines have fees if they withdraw money from other banks and it's fine. But over the counter I think it is not fine to other who still not using ATM cards.

1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
28 Jan 13
I also think that it is a strange idea that they have to pay a fee to withdraw their own money. I think that bank wants to "force" people to use the ATMs since that is cheaper for the banks. If more people use the ATMs they probably think that they would be able to fire some of the employees and save money on the salaries. This new fee is going to affect everyone who prefers to withdraw money over the counter instead of using an ATM. I think that $7 is a lot money since they have to pay that amount every single time they want to withdraw money and not just once. I always use an ATM, but I feel bad for the people who prefer to avoid the ATMs.
@lampar (7584)
• United States
6 Feb 13
Banks nowadays have a lot of leeway and leverage in setting their own banking policy in my country, they can practically use their discretionary power to decide what sort of customers service they want to provide, they have a choice of providing a free service or a charged service to their account holders base on their own overhead cost, sometime if they think that certain fees or charges are necessary to keep them in the profit loop, they can levy those additional cost to their customers without breaking any banking law, i don't have much of an opinion on this fee, so long as if i am an account holder in that bank, i am given the rights to close or open my account whenever i decide to do so is not violated.
If i do a lot of withdrawal from the counter in a month instead of using ATM, i may want to consider closing my account in that bank per se because i can't afford to pay such a stiff fee every time i withdraw my own money, if i am using the counter to withdraw only 1-2 time a year, i may not consider it is such a big deal, it all depend on how frequent i have to use the counter for my withdrawal, i personally understand i am dealing with a for-profit establishment, having to pay for the service is quite a normal occurrence in today commercial world. Whether it is legal or not, i will leave it for the regulator to sort it out. 
If i do a lot of withdrawal from the counter in a month instead of using ATM, i may want to consider closing my account in that bank per se because i can't afford to pay such a stiff fee every time i withdraw my own money, if i am using the counter to withdraw only 1-2 time a year, i may not consider it is such a big deal, it all depend on how frequent i have to use the counter for my withdrawal, i personally understand i am dealing with a for-profit establishment, having to pay for the service is quite a normal occurrence in today commercial world. Whether it is legal or not, i will leave it for the regulator to sort it out. 
@thesids (22180)
• Bhubaneswar, India
22 Jan 13
The banks always have made more money by using many other means. And this extra 7.00 USD for those who withdraw from the Counter and not the ATM is quite an unwelcome thing. I agree, the salary part but then, morally, I see it quite unfair. I have my reasoning too - I think it is mostly the old age people (as you mention too on your discussion) who prefer the traditional method. And these old people do not have a big income in the present day. So definitely the extra 7 USD would be more painful to give away for them.
Another reason why I dont support this is - due to the availability of ATMs, Net Banking, Online Payments, Mobile Banking and many more such ways to pay, the number of people who frequent the banks gets lessened. So there is no need for the banks to hire more people and put them in the same branch. More people definitely asks for more salary and hence they should cut down on the recruitment of more people instead of robbing the older generation and making them pay the salary for the extra employees.
We all know that over the period, the number of people visiting banks would get smaller and smaller. So why make things more complicated for those who frequent? Instead they can think of making "Pay an extra 0.10 USD" per ATM transaction and I am sure, they would get much more than what they can via the 7 USD per transaction at the counter.

1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
23 Jan 13
I agree with the things you wrote. There is no doubt that this is going to affect of the older generation as most people from the younger generation use the ATMs. Most of the people who are retired already have a lower income than the people who work so it would be extra hard for them to pay that kind of fee each time they want to withdraw money.
That was the first thing that I thought about when I heard about it. It is not going to affect me personally since I always use the ATMs. When I want to transfer money or pay bills I do it online and I don't visit the bank in person, but there are still people who prefer the tradtional meothod where they visit the bank in person, and I don't like the idea of this fee.
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
22 Jan 13
Yes, I think that is their intention. They probably think that more people will choose to use the ATMs instead of asking an employee to withdraw money for them and that way they would be able to fire some of the employees. The people like your mother and my grandmother use prefer to talk to a real person will have to pay a each time and I think that $7 is quite a lot of money since you have to pay every single time you visit the bank. If you only had to pay once, it wouldn't have been a big problem, but it is $7 each time you want to withdraw money.
1 person likes this
@Raine38 (12387)
• United States
21 Jan 13
Some people still prefer to do their transactions over the counter instead of through the ATM because of security issues. Some ATMs are in shady locations or have been tapped to have scanners that steal your account details. At least if they transact with a bank staff, it's safer. It is also not advisable to withdraw huge amounts of money over the ATM; besides the ATM machines have a limit. But if its just a one time deal, the new fee should be a small price to pay.
1 person likes this
@Porcospino (31365)
• Denmark
22 Jan 13
It is true that there is a security issue when we use a ATM, and we sometimes hear about the different kinds of scams related to ATMs. I use them every time and it is much faster than waiting in line inside the bank, but bad things do happen so we have to be careful when we use them. Yes, there are some limitations when we use an ATM. If we have to withdraw a large amount of money we are not able to do it from an ATM, and I think that is a good thing in case our debit card gets stolen. The new fee will get quite expensive for the people who withdraw cash at the counter, because it not a fee that you only pay once, you have to pay $7 every time you want to withdraw money at the counter.




I agree, this is more common in India and if we had to pay an extra amount to the bank when we were withdrawing from the bank, at least I would have been bankrupt








