The lesser of two evils dilemma

Tweet

After Barack Obama turned out to be more of a corporate tool in progressive's clothing that what many were hoping he would be, I swore I would never again vote for the lesser of two evils. (No, he's not a commie, a muslim, or a foreigner. The birther thing has been resolved, he goes to a Christian church, and just look at his bank bailout. If he were a communist he would have nationalized the banks, not bailed them out. I won't respond to any BS Obama hate smear crapola on this discussion). I say he's a corporate tool because of the bank bailouts, his attempts to appoint mostly Wall Street guys to financial type positions, his support of trade deals such as the TPP, etc. He may talk progressive, but he's farther right than Richard Nixon on some things. Anyway, back to my point. I was hoping to see this country head back away from the trade deals that have sent our jobs away, the removal of regulations that have helped Wall Street ruin our economy, the wars that have destabilized the Middle East and sent money where it is not helping our people get out of poverty, etc. However, I have come to the conclusion that both political parties are firmly in the pockets of the big money elites. The Dems may talk progressive, and the Repubs may talk jobs and family values, but the reality is that both support legislation and appointments that have given our country to Chevron and Goldman Sachs, etc. So I swore I wouldn't vote for the lesser of two evils. California has literally made it impossible to keep that promise in general elections due to enacting a "top two" rule unless I don't vote at all. I can vote for third party candidates in the primaries, but not in the general election. Sometimes that means I will be voting for 2 Democrats, and sometimes it's two Republicans, but after the primary I cannot vote Libertarian, or Peace and Freedom or whatever. I can't even write in a candidate. But let's pretend we didn't have a top two situation. I'd still have a dilemma. Let's just say that there's a candidate for party X that I think is really awful, and a candidate for party B who is OK on some things and not on others. I can either vote third party, which is one vote less for the lesser of two evils, I can vote for the lesser evil, or I can not vote. Rather an unappetizing choice. Maybe that's why some folks don't vote. I did come across something interesting called Vote Pact. Basically, you find a person in the opposition party, and you both vow to vote third party. If enough people were to do this, you could take enough votes away from the big two so that a third party candidate would have a chance. Check out their site - they have a chart showing how this works. Something to think about.