There is no such thing as the right to a view

@Fleura (35007)
United Kingdom
November 2, 2015 8:24am CST
In UK law there is no such thing as the right to a view, which seems a shame sometimes but is just as well otherwise nothing would ever get done! At the back of my parents’ house there is a row of beech trees, which I planted myself with my Mum about 35 years ago when they were about 4 inches tall. Since then a lot has changed. The field that was beyond the trees was developed about 10 years ago and there are now about 25 houses built there. At that time my Mum bought the strip of land immediately behind her house for a bit of extra privacy, then beyond that there is a public footpath and beyond that the backs of the new houses. So now there is a row of 5 beech trees about 30 feet tall and on the other side of that a strip of land which is always in shade and looks like a sort of no-man’s land because the trees look as though they mark the boundary (which they did originally). The trees are also far too close together, they would have been fine as a hedge but now they are tall and rather spindly, and most are lop-sided as they compete with their neighbours making them vulnerable in high winds (and this is a very windy spot), so reluctantly we decided they have to go. Over two days last week a team of tree surgeons was working away at getting them down. The first day went without a hitch, but somewhat predictably work was just starting on the second morning when a young woman still in her pyjamas came round from one of the new houses to ask if we couldn’t save the trees as removing them would spoil her view. I agreed it was a shame, but they were too tall and in the wrong place and there are still many other trees around, and I plan to plant a new hedge along the fence at the back. She still pleaded if we could not just trim them a bit so she wouldn’t have to see the road (which is of course what we see from the front of the house) because that would be so much worse than the pretty trees. I told her that I had planted and watched the trees grow from seedlings myself, but explained that nevertheless for various reasons they just had to go. She kept going on about the view so I told her that I had originally been able to look out of the back of the house at a view over fields, and now I had a housing estate to look at, but I couldn’t ask people like her to knock their houses down so I could enjoy the nice view again. At that she thanked us for listening and went away. I don’t want to fall out with neighbours (luckily they are not immediately adjacent as the public footpath is between us) but there is a limit to how accommodating one can be. If I had never planted the trees in the first place they would not have been missed of course. How far would you go to keep your neighbours happy? All rights reserved. © Text and image copyright Fleur 2015.
12 people like this
12 responses
@LadyDuck (502427)
• Italy
2 Nov 15
We have strict rules about the trees and the maximum height of the hedges and so on. I see that one of our neighbors have overgrown trees, but I like them and I will not complain.
3 people like this
• Greece
2 Nov 15
@boiboing When we first moved on to this piece of land we were told to plant some trees before tackling anything else. We did so, but careful about where we planted them. Others have been less than careful, planting trees on the very edge of the narrow lane that leads from our house to the main road. Eventually they overlooked the lane so much that we had to ask the Council to do something about it. There are laws but nothing was done in spite of frequent telephone calls. Eventually my husband and another neighbour trimmed back the offending branches themselves .It is not much use having rules if no one enforces them.
3 people like this
@boiboing (13147)
• Northampton, England
2 Nov 15
You're in Switzerland @LadyDuck - they have rules about EVEYTHING!
2 people like this
@boiboing (13147)
• Northampton, England
2 Nov 15
@41CombedaleRoad This illustrates beautifully the difference between living in Greece and living in Switzerland.
2 people like this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
2 Nov 15
It has always seemed strange to me that you can plant trees that totally block any further view, but are not allowed to build a fence above a certain height.
3 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
2 Nov 15
Yes now there are rules about tall hedges, but these do not apply to trees.
1 person likes this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
2 Nov 15
@Fleura If you chop the trees down instead of cutting them bit by bit, you could aim it to land on her house and improve the view at the same time.
2 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
2 Nov 15
I just thought it was funny that the woman who came round seemed to think I should preserve her view, but of course she wouldn't be willing to do anything to restore ours!
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
2 Nov 15
I can understand her disappointment in the disappearance of the trees, but in the end, they are your trees and you have the right to do what you want to do with them. The landlord here cut down all the trees the first year I was here, I never got to see them turn color in the autumn and they did provide a little privacy. But that's life. Trees do grow too tall and then they aren't as attractive and could be dangerous.
3 people like this
@cahaya1983 (11116)
• Malaysia
3 Nov 15
She should have understood the decision to remove the trees when you explained it and not insist on keeping them there. Everyone wants a nice view but you just have to do what you have to do. It's impossible to please everyone.
2 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
3 Nov 15
In essence they are my plants in my garden to do as I please, she could plant her own trees if she wanted. Of course, as I said to James Higgins, before long I expect she will appreciate being able to see the hills further away and when new trees grow she will complain about those!
2 people like this
@PainsOnSlate (21845)
• Canada
3 Nov 15
If she's like me, if the trees weren't there I wouldn't have purchased the house. She can move again. If someone was killed by one of those trees you would have been sued. You did the most responsible thing to do. We have trees behind our house but its government green space and will never go away. There could some day be a fire but even then it would be green again in a short while.
2 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
3 Nov 15
I think she will find the result is not as bad as she feared - she will be able to see over the road to the hills beyond.
2 people like this
• Canada
4 Nov 15
@Fleura It never as bad as you think it will be. Life goes on.
1 person likes this
@Morleyhunt (21741)
• Canada
4 Jan 16
A few years ago our view changed from, endless field and trees, to a wall twenty feet from my window. No I was not happy.
2 people like this
@Morleyhunt (21741)
• Canada
4 Jan 16
@Fleura I could post about our disappearing view. Our estate agent had been duped by the city, just as much as we had been.
1 person likes this
@Shellyann36 (11383)
• United States
2 Nov 15
Here views being interrupted can end up in a big debate. Lots of people buy land for views and then later the views they had are taken away by new housing developments. Our area is growing too fast for my happiness. Fortunately we are living on 10 acres and quite a bit of it is marsh and not usable for building. As far as my neighbors go I am not sure how far we would go to keep the peace.
2 people like this
@BelleStarr (61463)
• United States
2 Nov 15
I would have done just as you did, remind her that she has spoiled your view.
2 people like this
@boiboing (13147)
• Northampton, England
2 Nov 15
Maybe should have put some clothes on before she came out to see you!
1 person likes this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
2 Nov 15
Yes it wasn't that early, about 9:30, you'd think she'd have got dressed by then especially as she didn't come the short way round but must have walked all the way to the main road and then in through the front gate!
@destry (2567)
• Kirkwall, Scotland
2 Nov 15
Shame there is no view - fortunatly we have no neighbours blocking our view! . . . only the birds
2 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
2 Nov 15
It's nice to be able to see some open space like that!
2 people like this
• Eugene, Oregon
2 Nov 15
I think you have made a reasonable decision. It is unfortunate that her view will change, but that is not your problem.
2 people like this
@Fleura (35007)
• United Kingdom
2 Nov 15
Actually I don't think it will be as bad as she expects, with the trees gone she will be able to see past our house (they are higher up), over the road and across to the hills on the other side. I expect that in a few more years, when the new trees I am just planting have grown, people will be asking me to cut them down so as not to block their view of the hills!
2 people like this
• Canada
5 Nov 15
It's one of the reasons I prefer living in the country...neighbours tend to keep to themselves and it's mostly farms out here;)
2 people like this