Exclusion of Immigrants
By Sherry
@norcal (4889)
Franklinton, North Carolina
December 9, 2015 4:54pm CST
Donald Trump’s proposed ban on immigration by Muslims does have precedence in US Law. The Chinese Exclusion Act was a US federal law passed in 1882.
It prohibited all immigration of Chinese laborers, and by their definition that meant pretty much everybody. It was the first US law to exclude a specific ethnic group.
Even Chinese who were already in the country could not move freely between the US and China, they could not bring their families, and they could never become US citizens.
This draconian law was not repealed until 1943, when China became a US ally during WWII!
7 people like this
9 responses
@JudyEv (382146)
• Rockingham, Australia
9 Dec 15
Australia was a bit more subtle. It was unofficially called the 'White Australia policy' meaning anyone of a different colour would/could be excluded. But it was all very above board. They were given a language test when they entered the country. If they didn't want them to pass they gave the test in a language the person had no hope of knowing.
2 people like this
@ScribbledAdNauseum (104615)
• United States
10 Dec 15
One thing I like to point out is that every single last one of us living in the US today are immigrants. It does not matter how many generations have been born into this Country, we stole it from the Native Americans.
1 person likes this
@ScribbledAdNauseum (104615)
• United States
10 Dec 15
@norcal Very few are full blooded Natives. 

1 person likes this
@norcal (4889)
• Franklinton, North Carolina
10 Dec 15
@ScribbledAdNauseum True, due largely to our success at rubbing them out.
1 person likes this

@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
10 Dec 15
Our treatment of the Chinese was also quite harsh. Eureka Stockade.
It wasn't until the time of Gough Whitlam that he repealed the White Australia Policy in the early 1970s. I can get an exact date, but it will take time to find it. He was also the first Prime Minister to visit China & made it a priority. It was interesting to be fighting in the same war as allies with the Chinese, but not accepting any immigrants from there. We would have benefited greatly as a country to have Chinese immigrants earlier in history in place of all the Rednecks we have now, or the 100000 strong Fascist Army we had for decades pretty much controlling the country! It's surprising how little we know about our own history!
It wasn't until the time of Gough Whitlam that he repealed the White Australia Policy in the early 1970s. I can get an exact date, but it will take time to find it. He was also the first Prime Minister to visit China & made it a priority. It was interesting to be fighting in the same war as allies with the Chinese, but not accepting any immigrants from there. We would have benefited greatly as a country to have Chinese immigrants earlier in history in place of all the Rednecks we have now, or the 100000 strong Fascist Army we had for decades pretty much controlling the country! It's surprising how little we know about our own history!1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Dec 15
Well everyone hates to hear it, but it is 'one' solution. It's not the politically correct solution or the ethical solution, but it would be one that would stop foreign terrorists from slipping in under the guise of an immigrant. I like my idea, tell all Muslims to self-police their own religion. If they call it a religion of peace, then I want them all to become keepers of the peace by reporting the bad eggs among them. Solidarity because of religion is just stupid, because that person might be your religion but it doesn't mean they won't blow you up tomorrow!
1 person likes this

@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Dec 15
@norcal Well that's a sure way to never get support again. Is he advocating the internet or social media? I'm afraid both are pretty necessary these days.
1 person likes this
@norcal (4889)
• Franklinton, North Carolina
10 Dec 15
@OneOfMany you got that right.we will never put that Genie back in the bottle.
1 person likes this

@moffittjc (128837)
• Gainesville, Florida
10 Dec 15
I read somewhere today that Trump's proposal to ban Muslim's from immigrating would be overturned as unconstitutional, based on religious affiliation. Interestingly, I wonder if it would be possible to ban a group of people based on different set of criteria? Or, does a President have the authority to set the limit to the number of people who could immigrate? If that does fall under the legal authority of the President, then Trump (if he was President) could possibly stipulate that the US would only accept 10 refugees a year, or something ridiculous like that!
1 person likes this

@moffittjc (128837)
• Gainesville, Florida
10 Dec 15
@norcal That's why I think it would be easier for a President to just limit the numbers of immigrants coming into the country. I don't know if Congress passes laws that establish how many people we can let in each year, but if it is up to the President, then he can basically control who gets in or who stays out by limiting the number of people we're going to accept.
1 person likes this

@connierebel (1557)
• United States
10 Dec 15
I didn't know about that exclusion, but I do know that more recently, Jimmy Carter blocked Iranian immigration. While it seems un-American on the surface, we have to realize that security of our own citizens comes first.
@ThankyouLord (698)
• St. Petersburg, Florida
10 Dec 15
They (the government) is considering refusing visas to those who have lived in or visited certain countries that are known to harbor or produce terrorists. So that makes more sense to me. That gets rid of all the Muslim talk. Australia and even Hawaii strictly limit who can come and live there. Australia I believe limits people who want to move there to needed educational criteria. So, if you have a masters in iceberg formation, I guess you couldn't go there, unless you were on a trip. I wonder how many other restrictions Australia has. Other countries also have stricter rules as to who can get a visa to go there, and no one thinks much about it. You just don't go. But if America starts talking about immigrant restriction, all h---- breaks loose.
1 person likes this

![By Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, vol. 54 (1882 April 1), p. 96. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons By Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, vol. 54 (1882 April 1), p. 96. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons](https://img.mylot.com/2737641.jpeg)









