Sign of a Tank
By Judy Evans
@JudyEv (382104)
Rockingham, Australia
February 19, 2016 4:11am CST
In August last year we were travelling in Germany in a motor-home when we went over a bridge bearing a series of signs. The signs tell us that the bridge is only suitable for vehicles weighing 16 tonnes or less and having a length of 11 metres long or less. In addition, it is only wide enough for one vehicle at a time. Vehicles are limited to 8 kilometres per hour. But then comes the bit that intrigued me - tanks could cross at 20 kilometres per hour.
I presume it is a very old sign and a leftover from World War II. Or maybe they still do army exercises in this area. And why would tanks be allowed to cross at a speed very much faster than anything else? Another of life's little mysteries.
14 people like this
12 responses
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
19 Feb 16
The weight of most vehicles is distributed among 4 or 6 wheels, whereas a tank uses a track to spread the weight evenly. I cannot say that this is the reason, but it does seem likely.
I can just picture someone pushing a fish tank on wheels across the bridge at 20 mph.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (382104)
• Rockingham, Australia
20 Feb 16
@Asylum Colliding with a kangaroo is common on many of our roads - just like people hitting deer or badger or whatever. Kangaroos are very single-minded and have absolutely no road sense. If they want to cross the road, they cross and if a car happens to be in the way they just cannon into it.
1 person likes this


@louievill (28846)
• Philippines
19 Feb 16
@MALUSE Who said WW? Have you heard what "shatterbelt states" are? If not you better do some readings! Or maybe I should just tell you for the benefit of everyone. Theoretically they are territories caught between 2 powers, the Ukraine and Belarus are good examples cause it over laps borders and territories in this case between Germany and Russia
To continue, ( I spaced if that would be good for your eyes). Recently some shatterbelt States has applied for NATO status, of course this would not sit well with Russia, we all saw the reaction when the pro Russian government of President Yanukovych was overthrown in the Ukraine so on and so forth. So this is what I meat by German forces ( most probably tanks) rushing to the front as a member of NATO. It's unlike the German blitzkrieg invasion of Poland which is entirely different. I hope you see and got my point!
1 person likes this
@louievill (28846)
• Philippines
19 Feb 16
@MALUSE I think i had been misunderstood, the "shatterbelt state" concept although takes into consideration actual physical, geographical territories and boundaries goes a little beyond that. It's about opposing powers and weak or weaker states in between. One good example was Poland before before WW2, it existed but the powers only saw it as between Russia and Germany. I think(?) the concept also applies to ethnicity of a region as in Russian speaking Ukranians.etc...
Fast forward in time, with the dissolution of the USSR, unification of Germany, Poland joining NATO, blah blah blah....the concept, theory or what ever you want to call it is still very much applicable, NATO (Germany included and considered a power and now allied to Poland) as opposed to Russia.
Now back to the discussion, given this scenario, it won't come as a surprise to see signs(maybe) or actual tanks move from one direction to the other, that's the reason why i speculated when I made the response.
@slund2041 (3314)
• United States
19 Feb 16
@MALUSE Thanks! Will check out your link.
2 people like this

@BelleStarr (61463)
• United States
19 Feb 16
I like the fact that they want the tank to travel faster than the cars, don't want that weight lingering on the bridge I guess. lol
2 people like this
@alchemistrx (2547)
• Philippines
19 Feb 16
The sign must have been preserved by the German government.
1 person likes this

@JudyEv (382104)
• Rockingham, Australia
20 Feb 16
@alchemistrx Well, I was until you queried it! 

1 person likes this

@louievill (28846)
• Philippines
19 Feb 16
It could be more recent perhaps cold war era East and West Germany or it could still be active for Nato exercises or if if they have to be deployed in the Russian front.
2 people like this
@slund2041 (3314)
• United States
19 Feb 16
Interesting picture! I have never seen a sign like that. It is cool that is is leftover from World War ll.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (382104)
• Rockingham, Australia
20 Feb 16
I'd like a sign like that on our place - maybe at the front gate.
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
19 Feb 16
fun sign to see - most likely for a modern allied army base that transports tanks rather than the Waffen SS though
2 people like this
@JudyEv (382104)
• Rockingham, Australia
20 Feb 16
I couldn't understand why the sign hadn't been removed. But Malu has given us a good resource.
















