Do you think a 3rd party candidate can be a US President if they will be allowed to debate the Republican rep and Democrat Rep?

This is only partially true. The rules for participation in the debates state a candidate has to have a showing of 15% in the polls. That might be a little stringent. Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate, was running about 9% the last I heard. Jill Stein was—I think—about 3%. I've seen Johnson on some news programs, so does have media access. He's a former governor of New Mexico (he was a Republican then). His running mate, Bill Weld, is former governor of Massachusetts and U.S. Attorney General These are not newbies. They've been around the block. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, is a physician and an activist, gods bless her. She's done a lot of work for health and environmental reform. But it's remarks like the following that that make me think she's nut (from a Wikipedia article about her): "When asked in a Vox interview about Russian aggression in Crimea and Ukraine, Stein answered, 'These are highly questionable situations. Why are we — Russia used to own Ukraine. Ukraine was historically a part of Russia for quite some period of time, and we all know there was this conversation with Victoria Nuland about planning the coup and who was going to take over... Let’s just stop pretending there are good guys here and bad guys here. These are complicated situations. Yeah, Russia is doing lots of human rights abuse, but you know what? So are we.'" Do I wish we had viable alternatives to main parties? Yes, I do. And I've been wanting them for a long time. The two main parties are different flavors of the same old nonsense.

That's why I don't watch their debates, some contents but not all of it. I thought the US media was truth and just before only recently you realized the truth.

I guess it should be allowed.

This prove that the media are partial. They should give the chance to everybody to express their opinion and be known by all the voters.