Intrusive Application Form Questions.

Preston, England
November 1, 2016 10:28am CST
I'm seeing more and more job application forms in the UK that ask for information on a potential employees religious persuasion and sexual preferences. Some forms list the main religions, C Of E, Catholicism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, etc so applicants can underline one, and usually include atheism / agnosticism too, as well as presenting a box for listing other beliefs and an option for 'prefer not to say'. I always 'prefer not to say'. As long as our beliefs don't interfere with the job we should be free to believe what we like. I am tempted to use the other option and write in Jedi, Mithrais Worship, Satanism, Great Cthulhu, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, The Church Of The Third Coming Of Wilbur from Mr Ed, or The Temple of none of your business. With gender preferences some forms expect an admission of heterosexuality, homosexuality, Transgenderism, etc. Here again there's a 'prefer not to say'. Option and a chance to say what other preferences you have to which I am tempted to write inter-speciesism, all manner of perversion, inanimate objects including items such as you sell, Martians, and as before none of your business, possibly adding a few explicit drawings in the margins. Such matters should have no bearing on any job, though Satanism might raise a few eyebrows if joining the Catholic priesthood. Unfortunately stating 'prefer not to say'. Triggers the employers belief in not pursuing my application form any further. Arthur Chappell
11 people like this
12 responses
@sueznewz2 (10409)
• Alicante, Spain
1 Nov 16
that's the trouble isn't it.... them not pursuing the application..., It's not fair... and surely smacks of discrimination, has this been passed as acceptable by the powers that be... ??
4 people like this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
1 Nov 16
It would only qualify as illegal if the answers influenced the selection. All employers would deny any such suggestion, but personally I cannot believe that anyone is truly capable of ignoring the data when making their decision.
3 people like this
@sueznewz2 (10409)
• Alicante, Spain
1 Nov 16
@Asylum yes me too.... and i include myself in this ... how many candidates would have the bottle to challenge the prospective employers...
3 people like this
@sueznewz2 (10409)
• Alicante, Spain
1 Nov 16
@Asylum mmm true...,
2 people like this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
1 Nov 16
Such questions should never be allowed, especially considering that none are legally allowed to be taken into consideration when selecting an employee.
3 people like this
@celticeagle (189874)
• Boise, Idaho
1 Nov 16
How weird. My daughter put 'Satanism' on hers once. I thought it was funny too. I wonder how weird some places are becoming about transgenders and the bathroom now days. I know the schools have had a big issue with it in different areas. Like you said, it should have no bearing on job performance but I guess it does in the boss's eyes.
2 people like this
@maezee (41985)
• United States
7 Nov 16
That seems strange. I have had to answer some "optional" questions on a separate "affirmative action" form that they say remains anonymous just to see who is applying, but that is it. Is it part of the application process?
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
11 Nov 16
@maezee yes, it is attached to the main form so easy for employers to access
@akalinus (44366)
• United States
1 Nov 16
How do you guess what to answer? Is it bad to be straight now? Are you supposed to be an Atheist? It sounds like they are doing this for their own prurient interests and it should be illegal to ask those questions unless the job demands certain standards.
3 people like this
@Sasquatchy (1131)
• Canada
3 Nov 16
Here those questions are against the law and are descrimation and sexes. Goes against human rights
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
6 Nov 16
they say they are just for survey purposes but clearly the employers see the answers and often take refusing to answer as cause for suspicion - such questions need to be irradicated from forms
1 person likes this
• Canada
7 Nov 16
1 person likes this
@bunnybon7 (50970)
• Holiday, Florida
1 Nov 16
yes its like that here also. except it says "other"? instead usually but then it says specify. it just seems wrong. if they would just go by performance perhaps we would have better service and workers out there.
1 person likes this
@Jessicalynnt (50523)
• Centralia, Missouri
1 Nov 16
I dont think america allows either of those 2 questions and I would answer the same, or write in Noneofyobiz
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
1 Nov 16
Seriously? Such questions on forms are illegal in the US.
1 person likes this
@Ronrybs (21497)
• London, England
1 Nov 16
Not heard of this and it seems a worrying development
1 person likes this
@5thHouse (1678)
• Sheffield, England
1 Nov 16
It's ridiculous, isn't it? I know they say this information is just going to be used for statistical purposes and won't have any bearing on whether or not you get the job, but I'm not sure that's always the case.
1 person likes this
@XinfulThotz (4136)
• Singapore, Singapore
1 Nov 16
Really? They ask such questions on job application forms? But what has those got to do with the person's ability or capability to work??
1 person likes this