Preston Bus Station Architecture

Photo taken by me – Preston Bus Station
Preston, England
March 15, 2017 5:47pm CST
One of Proud Preston’s most prominent architectural features is its central bus station, which has as many admirers as opponents. I personally hate the monstrous eyesore. It was built in 1968-69 to Brutalist designs by Charles Williams and Keith Ingham, with 80 bus bays (despite Preston not having 80 bus and coach services) and a multi-storey car park. Brutalism is designed to look stark and direct, with exposed vast amounts of concrete and brick, undecorated or patterned. It is often used in purely functional buildings, such as government offices, schools and soul-less council housing blocks such as the notorious slums of Moss Side and Hulme in Manchester, which have now been mercifully demolished. Critics of Brutalism include myself, John Betjamen and Prince Charles who actually said the Luftwaffe only reduced architecture to rubble while Brutalism treats it worse. It’s rare for me to agree with royalty. The station is awkward to leave or approach on foot, with just a few subways and zebra crossings set far apart. Simply crossing anywhere between buses can result in criminal fines. Where possible, passengers board or get off at bus stops elsewhere in the city rather than going into the station concourse. The station narrowly avoided demolition in 2013 when just over a 1,000 admirers petitioned successfully to get it recognized as a grade 2 building of architectural interest through the National Trust. It is a truly horrible structure that shows Brutalism really lives up to its name. Arthur Chappell
6 people like this
7 responses
@Jackalyn (7558)
• Oxford, England
16 Mar 17
I do not think I will prioritise Preston on an architectural wandering. Oxford bus station is just plain boring.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
16 Mar 17
@Jackalyn there are many genuinely beautiful buildings here in Preston, just not the bus station. The highest church steeple in the UK (church rather than cathedral) is our St Walburge's Church
@Jackalyn (7558)
• Oxford, England
16 Mar 17
@arthurchappell To be fair. I have never been to Lancashire in my life.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
16 Mar 17
@Jackalyn Nor I to Oxford though I would like to go there some time
1 person likes this
@Ronrybs (21497)
• London, England
16 Mar 17
I like to look at architecture as part of its time, but these concrete monsters are hard to treat with sympathy. Having said that, I am not sure I'd be knocking them down just for looks
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
16 Mar 17
@Ronrybs they should plan what to replace it with before they tear it down but I would like to see it go
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
16 Mar 17
@Ronrybs yes I alays dread what will rise on the ruins of old buildings
@Ronrybs (21497)
• London, England
16 Mar 17
@arthurchappell Sometimes, it seems to be they get pulled down and then replaced with any old bit of rubbish. Who knows maybe in a few hundred years people will think they are great. If concrete lasts that long!
1 person likes this
@BelleStarr (61463)
• United States
16 Mar 17
Yes it looks a rather ugly building with nothing to redeem it.
1 person likes this
@Jessicalynnt (50523)
• Centralia, Missouri
16 Mar 17
it certainly wasn't made very pretty
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
17 Mar 17
@Jessicalynnt not at all, as well as being very big and awkward to get in and out of on foot
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (382021)
• Rockingham, Australia
16 Mar 17
It certainly doesn't appeal to me. Very ordinary.
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
16 Mar 17
I agree with you: not appealing or attractive at all. Typical hideous 60s architecture that can be found all over the world. No charm no style.
1 person likes this
@Deepizzaguy (122137)
• Lake Charles, Louisiana
16 Mar 17
Thank you for sharing the story of Brutalism at its worst. The sight of that building looks very odd.
1 person likes this