TV Review - Dr Who – Knock Knock

Photo taken by me – The Doctor Who TARDIS – FAB Café, Manchester
Preston, England
May 17, 2017 4:55am CST
Spoiler alerts Given that one of the oldest knock-knock jokes involves Dr Who “Who’s there? – Doctor Doctor Who? That’ right” ) the use of Knock Knock in an actual adventure title isn’t too surprising. Sadly it is a weak episode though surrounded by much better ones. With the Doctor seemingly honouring his oath to guard the Vault for once, Bill look for student accommodation with a rather random bunch of her friends who we never really get to know properly as characters. After struggling for a while in the search the group are offered a ridiculously cheap creepy old apartment by a sinister landlord character, played very well by Poirot actor David Suchet. The house is a typical haunted property, with raging thunderstorms and creaky floorboards. The Doctor pops in to help investigate and as the student vanish one by one or get trapped in separate rooms, they all learn the landlord hasn’t left the house. The cockroaches then start eating the tenants, as the Doctor and Bill discover that the Landlord is using the alien (not ghost) creatures to preserve his mother who he has turned to wood, while feeding them a bunch of tenants every few decades. The Doctor solves the problem by waking the wooden mother up so she tells her older looking child off and lets the cockroaches finish them both off. Bill’s friend are then all miraculously restored to life though not the people devoured in previous generations by the roaches, who then swallow the whole house and vanish. This all felt rather Scooby Doo, especially as no one really dies except the Landlord and his wooden mum. The roaches swarming over everyone looked suitably icky but such an effect has been used before even in episodes of The Big Bang Theory (in one of Sheldon’s nightmares). The students are just stock figures intended for expendability. In the original script one of them proves to be descended from Harry Sullivan (a Fourth Doctor Companion) but that was dropped from the final version aired. This clearly needed more death and more Suchet but less Shaggy, Freddy and Thelma. Letting everyone we never knew well enough to care about live was a pointless outcome. Arthur Chappell
4 people like this
4 responses
@Poppylicious (11134)
• United Kingdom
17 May 17
I liked the episode. It was a bit Scrooby, but it was gentle and sometimes gentle makes a nice break. :)
2 people like this
• Preston, England
17 May 17
@Poppylicious it was well acted especially by Suchet
1 person likes this
@pgntwo (22405)
• Derry, Northern Ireland
17 May 17
Suchet's character was creepy. A cross between his monocular character in the film version of Pratchett's Going Postal and Norman Bates from Bates' Motel...
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
17 May 17
@pgntwo he is a great actor - perfect in Poirot and superb as Blott in Blott On The Landcape
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
17 May 17
@pgntwo ye, both very good adaptations, though the film of Wilt was a little disappointing - they haven't done the other Tom Sharp books on TV yet
1 person likes this
@pgntwo (22405)
• Derry, Northern Ireland
17 May 17
@arthurchappell Blott must have been great fun to play... David Jason had fun with Porterhouse Blue as well, I imagine.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (189820)
• Boise, Idaho
18 May 17
How odd and even weird. As are most Dr.Who's.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (189820)
• Boise, Idaho
19 May 17
@arthurchappell ......Like someone's bad dreams.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
18 May 17
@celticeagle they can get very strange
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
19 May 17
@celticeagle tapping into that is the essene of horror
1 person likes this
• Defuniak Springs, Florida
22 May 17
I have not made it this far in this new series. I have only seen the first two episodes.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
22 May 17
@thislittlepennyearns hope you have fun catching up