Did She Steal the Guy's stuff ?
By Gus Kilthau
@Ceerios (4698)
Goodfellow, Texas
July 12, 2017 2:37pm CST
Did She Steal the Guy's stuff ? -
A big story is now breaking about the supposed plagiarism by Chelsea Clinton of a children's book written by another book writer.
From the news going around, it seems that the guy who wrote the kids' book queried the book publisher as to his new book - and, instead of working on his book with the writer, the publisher had a much better and way more profitable idea.
I think that he may have passed information on to Chelsea Clinton who, if she did not know not to, could have listened to the publisher and authored a very similar book, successfully.
The fellow who supplied the publisher detailed information about his new book was left out in the cold and is now suing both the book publisher who may be responsible for any plagiarism and his writer-client, Chelsea Clinton.
It would seem that the publisher believed that a best-selling author name would be way more profitable than would a fine new book from an unknown, brand new author.
Anyway, the news is that both the publisher and Chelsea Clinton are now summoned to attend the courthouse because they are, together, being sued for stealing the guy's book plan.
Back in the middle-1980s I worked as a consultant in the book publishing and book selling business, That experience taught me several things.
(1) There may be nothing in this world more difficult to produce than a best-selling book.
(2) There may be nothing in this world more difficult to sell than a book by an "no-name" author.
(3) You cannot tell from looking at the print on a manuscript page who might have written it.
(4) Once in a while it can be seen that a manuscript by some unknown, first-time author can be produced and marketed into a best selling book, but if the author is well-known for some reason, almost any manuscript can be successfully marketed.
(5) Case in point - I was asked to help rid a publisher of a load of beautifully produced, hardbound books clogging the warehouse. The author was an unknown - and the book was no best seller ("Mama was a Ballerina"). I could not even give those books away, much less sell them.
Anyway, what I am telling everyone here on these MyLot pages is that Chelsea Clinton probably did not know that the publisher provided her with book-writing information as to content that the publisher had gotten from the spurned author. She had no easy way of knowing. The publisher knew enough about Chelsea Clinton to understand that, with Chelsea, there was a best-seller no matter whose idea the book had been before she became involved.
Now, just for the fun of things, think what may come about should the real author of the spurned book get his book published in some manner. Will HE find himself being charged with plagiarism?
Image: Kids' Book - Pixabay.com
3 people like this
3 responses
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
12 Jul 17
There are so many people in so many fields that it's amazing everyone's efforts are not duplicated! How many time have you seen something and exclaimed, "That was my idea 4 years ago!! I should've gotten a patent!!" I know it's happened to me many times. So why not for a book idea?
Now, if there are lines in the book that are nearly identical to the original author's, I might be suspicious.
2 people like this

@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
12 Jul 17
@Ceerios You are correct, I was not thinking. One would have to have a prototype to get a patent and a written product to get a copyright, I believe. I've had some great ideas but not the funds to make a prototype; someone else nearly always does so they get the patent.
1 person likes this
@Ceerios (4698)
• Goodfellow, Texas
12 Jul 17
@dragon54u - It is not required to have a prototype to make application for a patent. What is required is that you are able to show that your invention "works" and that you are its original inventor. (There are several other things that you must also show...) Text descriptions and drawings, (etc) can be used and may be sufficient to show the inventing is factual.
Copyrights in the USA are automatic as to original writings or other tangible expressions of a person's thoughts, such as text, drawings. recordings, photos, and various other audio, video, cine' means.
It might be possible to gain copyright protection for a "fingerprint" or a vocal "grunt." There has to be some sort of meaning, purpose, etc. for copyright protection. I do not know if anyone has ever attempted to gain copyright over the noise of bowel gas emission, but that would seem possible - although very impractical. Noise and meaning combined. What an interesting thought. Often correct, but almost always verbally upside-down.
-Gus-
1 person likes this
@Ceerios (4698)
• Goodfellow, Texas
12 Jul 17
@dragon54u - As to patents, US patents are not issued for ideas but only for ideas reduce3d to actual practice. -Gus-
1 person likes this

@shikharava (1838)
•
12 Jul 17
Stealing someone's work and publishing as your own is a crime. It doesn't matter whether the culprit belongs to a high social group or not. A crime's a crime and everyone should be treated equally for the crimes if they are proven guilty.
2 people like this
@Ceerios (4698)
• Goodfellow, Texas
12 Jul 17
@shikharava - How might that work when the "thief" does not know that they are stealing? That is why there are different rules for children and for adults (who are supposed to know the rules, whereas children are expected to not know them yet.) -Gus-
1 person likes this






