Called up for Jury Duty

@lynnief (1203)
Australia
March 19, 2018 4:14am CST
I received a letter today saying that I have been called up for Jury Duty, and have to report to the court in a couple of weeks time. I knew it was coming up, because I had the letter about a month ago saying that I could expect to be called. This is the second time I have been called for Jury Duty. The first time, several years ago, I spent the day at the court room learning all about it, but didn't end up going on a jury. I thought I was going to be selected on a longer case, but at the last minute it got moved to the capital city. I wonder if I'll get selected this time. I know some people don't like the idea of Jury Duty, and do their best to get out of it, but I think it would be interesting. Do you have Jury Duty where you are? Would you like to be part of the jury for a court case, or not?
3 people like this
5 responses
@JudyEv (382357)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Mar 18
I've done jury duty once and found it interesting but I don't care if I never get called again.
1 person likes this
@lynnief (1203)
• Australia
19 Mar 18
Yes, I think once would probably be enough to get the experience.
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
19 Mar 18
Unfortunately yes and jury duty is an evil thing here.
1 person likes this
@allen0187 (59828)
• Philippines
20 Mar 18
No such thing here in the Philippines but I'm quite interested in experiencing jury duty.
@allen0187 (59828)
• Philippines
20 Mar 18
@lynnief (1203)
• Australia
20 Mar 18
There are, of course, restrictions on what you can say about a particular case, but if I get selected I'll do a post about the general experience.
1 person likes this
@dodo19 (48166)
• Beaconsfield, Quebec
19 Mar 18
I have never been called for jury duty. Maybe I will some day, but for the moment, I haven't.
@tony1r (303)
• Nairobi, Kenya
19 Mar 18
@lynnief,Here we have judges who have the final say on court cases. Is a jury system fairer?
@lynnief (1203)
• Australia
19 Mar 18
Here the judge passes sentence after the jury has decided whether the person is guilty or innocent. I think it's good that more than one person gets to make the decision, but I think sometimes in complicated cases the evidence is too much for ordinary lay people to really understand. I think in some cases maybe it would be better to have a panel of experts.
@tony1r (303)
• Nairobi, Kenya
19 Mar 18
@lynnief ordinary lay people may also be unduly influenced in some cases
@lynnief (1203)
• Australia
19 Mar 18
@tony1r True, although the system here tries to weed out any that might be influenced. Each of the lawyers (prosecution and defence) has the right to challenge any potential jurors that they think could be prejudiced, and exclude them from the case.