Book Movie And TV Review Agatha Christie The ABC Murders
@arthurchappell (44941)
Preston, England
December 28, 2018 6:27pm CST
1933 (Novel) Spoiler alerts.
This is my favourite of all the many Agatha Christie novels, and there are three distinct filmed versions of it too, one made for the cinema and two made for TV.
The book features Christie’s best known detective, Hercule Poirot, solving a case in which victims are killed in alphabetical order, by name and by location, i.e., Alice Asher is murdered in Andover. The detective is taunted with letters and the chief suspect appears to be an epileptic traveling salesman, but he is being framed.
The story seems to move away from the traditional whodunit with a known limited range of suspects, to the hunt for a serial killer, or does it?
Poirot is assisted by regular recurring companions Hastings and Inspector Japp, with some input by a brash new policeman called Crome.
The story moves at a frantic pace to one of the best conclusions Christie ever devised.
In 1965, the first film version came out, (retitled The Alphabet Murders) with Tony Randall (from The Odd Couple TV series) playing Poirot. It was played out for laughs, with the first victim being a circus clown murdered mid-act with a poison dart.
The only really memorable moment in the film is Poirot walking past Christie’s other famous hero, Miss Marple in the street, played by Margaret Rutherford, (who played her in several movies) but who sadly plays no other part in this story. It is the only time the characters have ever met. It never happens in the books.
The 1992 TV version with David Suchet as Poirot (the definitive performance in the role) is very faithful to the novel.
The 2018 version starring John Malkovitch takes a very different and darker turn, though it retains the original murder plot and perpetrator. Its change of direction comes with Poirot himself, a gloomier, more depressed figure. Hastings does not appear and Japp dies (of natural causes early in the story).
Poirot clashes with Crome who find that there is no record of Poirot’s long-claimed history of policing in pre-First World War Belgium.
Christie does convey a few of Poirot’s dark secrets in the last few novels, but this adaptation has him as a former priest, shaken from his faith after failing to stop a village massacre by the Germans. He arrives in Britain as a refugee with his police alias prepared.
It is a daring reconstruction, bravely creating a fresh mystery for those like me who think they know the story inside out. Malkovitch is great as a Poirot who makes Batman look happy and carefree by comparison. It also never detracts from the ingenuity of the pursuit of the actual ABC murderer too.
Arthur Chappell
5 people like this
6 responses
@responsiveme (22923)
• India
29 Dec 18
Gutternberg will have her old ones ,I think
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@Shavkat You may be able to order them online
1 person likes this
@Shavkat (141905)
• Philippines
30 Dec 18
@arthurchappell I agree. The best option that I should do.
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
29 Dec 18
I think Suchet is superb. The Malkovich version I have not seen. Don't know if it has come here yet.
2 people like this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@JohnRoberts It was shown here in three episodes finishing tonight
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
29 Dec 18
@arthurchappell So it is brand new then.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@JohnRoberts yes this was its first screening
1 person likes this
@LadyDuck (502979)
• Italy
29 Dec 18
I have read recently all the "Hercule Poirot" novels by Agatha Christie and I liked most of them. ABC Murders is an interesting plot and I like the TV version starring David Suchet as Poirot. Have you watched "Murder on the Orient Express" with Suchet? I have been deceived, I have re-read the story, I do not know why Directors sometimes add things that nothing have to do with the character.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@LadyDuck they were trying to vary it from the original film version which was great - both versions are better than he Kenneth Branagh abomination
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
30 Dec 18
@LadyDuck it was a travesty
1 person likes this
@LadyDuck (502979)
• Italy
30 Dec 18
@arthurchappell The one with Kenneth Branagh is horrible. The character of Hercule Poirot is so much distorted. Never seen the frail and small Poirot "breaking" a door and using his walking cane to hit people. Some movies should never see the day.
1 person likes this

@RasmaSandra (98187)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
29 Dec 18
I enjoy all of her mysteries but my favorites are with Hercule Poirot played by David Suchet.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@RasmaSandra he was the best Poirot by far
1 person likes this
@responsiveme (22923)
• India
29 Dec 18
I haven't seen the 2018 version. Seen the David Suchet ones. I love the Agatha Christie books and reread them even though I remember the end
2 people like this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@responsiveme Many are worth a second read
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@Courage7 yes even in comedies he is quite dark
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
29 Dec 18
@Courage7 he is usually good even when the movies are not
1 person likes this
@Courage7 (19626)
• United States
29 Dec 18
@arthurchappell I have a love dislike relationship with his characters. He is very good.
1 person likes this








