King Edward V
By John Welford
@indexer (4852)
Leicester, England
January 23, 2019 6:04am CST
Edward V was a king who reigned in name for a short time but never ruled.
He was aged 13 when his father, King Edward IV, died unexpectedly on 9th April 1483. His uncle, Richard Duke of Gloucester, took him under his protection and housed him (and his younger brother Richard) in the Tower of London, which was a royal residence and the usual place where a monarch at that time was prepared for his coronation.
However, Edward was never seen in public again. He was deposed by his uncle on 26th June and the short reign of King Richard III began. This meant that Edward had been king for two months and 17 days, the shortest reign of any King of England (but not Queen – the nine days of Lady Jane Grey hold that record).
The mystery of the “Princes in the Tower” continues to this day, but the likelihood is very strong that they were murdered on Richard’s orders. There are some doubters on this score, however, based on analyzing what advantage the deaths of the princes would have brought to Richard, given that Parliament had already declared their illegitimacy (on Richard’s orders) and they therefore did not offer a threat to his kingship.
On the other hand, if they had survived beyond 22nd August 1485, when Richard was defeated and killed at the Battle of Bosworth by Henry Tudor, the latter might well have regarded the last survivors of the Yorkist royal line as a threat that had to be eliminated.
The skeletons of two young boys were discovered in the Tower of London in 1674, and presumed to be those of Edward V and his brother Richard. They were reburied in 1993 in Westminster Abbey after tests had established that the remains were of approximately the right age at death. However, it was not possible to be absolutely certain that the mystery had been solved.
3 people like this
3 responses
@marguicha (230332)
• Chile
23 Jan 19
Another Edward. Is it possible to had new tests prove now that they were the princes?
2 people like this

@marguicha (230332)
• Chile
23 Jan 19
@indexer If the kings of Egipt were dug, why can´t they, in name of accuracy?
1 person likes this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
23 Jan 19
This is the fifth Edward out of eight! I was wondering about the DNA test possibility, because when the bones of their uncle, Richard III, were unearthed in Leicester a DNA test comparison was done with the only two known living descendants of his family, and presumably they are still alive - or at least the DNA record is still available. But would it be possible to dig them up from beneath Westminster Abbey?
2 people like this
@Fleura (34927)
• United Kingdom
23 Jan 19
@indexer If they only put them in there relatively recently they should be able to get them out again. And DNA technology has come a long way even since 1993. It's more a question of whether permission would be given to dig them up again just to satisfy the curiosity of a few historians.
2 people like this

@Nickzter1331 (4229)
• Philippines
24 Jan 19
Mystery will always be a mystery... there are certain things that will remain to be unsolved. But im really curious about what happened to them.. hehe..
Thanks for this.. :)





