The Victorian Era ~ Wife Selling

@celticeagle (160064)
Boise, Idaho
February 4, 2023 3:14pm CST
(Yes, there was no error. Wife selling.) Divorce was looked down upon in Victorian England. When couples were married it was for life. It was a time of traditional values and the belief that women were property. Divorce was expensive and something only a private act of Parliament could make happen. So the poor working classes would either advertise in the paper or take their wife to the marketplace to be sold. The price was whatever they could get, sometimes this included animals. They would actually bring their wive out into the marketplace with a halter around the neck and waste. Much like the selling of cattle, the woman was paraded around the square and, sometimes, even children were a part of the deal. The first recorded sale of a wife was in 1692 and the last was in 1913. Popularity grew in the mid-1800s and in Samuel Pyet Menafee's "Wives for Sale" he wrote that there were probably about 400 such sales during the period of about two hundred years. We've come a long way, haven't we? Picture is from my collection.
10 people like this
7 responses
@FourWalls (62755)
• United States
5 Feb 23
In some ways we’ve made no progress at all, because women are still seen as property. I didn’t know this, and now I’m sorry I do.
2 people like this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
5 Feb 23
I is a hard truth to take in.
1 person likes this
@RasmaSandra (74146)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
4 Feb 23
That is the most inhuman and ridiculous thing I have ever heard. That should have never been allowed to happen,
2 people like this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
4 Feb 23
They were property and men could do as they pleased with them. It certainly was inhumane.
2 people like this
@shaggin (71678)
• United States
6 Feb 23
That is so horrible. I wonder if these were prearranged marriages making them more likely to be an unhappy marriage leading to the selling. I cannot imagine selling a wife and child
1 person likes this
@shaggin (71678)
• United States
7 Feb 23
@celticeagle awful and disgusting yes!
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
7 Feb 23
@shaggin .......Glad we've moved forward.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
6 Feb 23
Probably. Sounds awful, doesn't it?
1 person likes this
@TheHorse (207511)
• Walnut Creek, California
4 Feb 23
Around the waste? That's disgusting!
2 people like this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
4 Feb 23
What waste?
1 person likes this
@aninditasen (15804)
• Raurkela, India
5 Feb 23
That was really inhuman and pathetic. They say hatred passes on from parents to off spring and that's the reason women in modern world are very cruel. The gene of cruelty and hatred might have passed on.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
5 Feb 23
Interesting.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (158720)
• United States
6 Feb 23
I was surprised to hear that the last date was as recent as 1913.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
6 Feb 23
So was I. But that is what I am reading.
1 person likes this
@youless (112166)
• Guangzhou, China
5 Feb 23
I think in the old time people had less human rights. Of course the situation was worse for women. In my country women had low position and many of their lives were miserable. It takes a long way for women to have a better situation today. Even today women can't have an equal treatment as well as men, sad to say. We still have a long way to go.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (160064)
• Boise, Idaho
5 Feb 23
A long way for sure.
1 person likes this