Should we not restrict the freedom of speech to control hate speeches?

Tweet

Freedom of speech or Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right that is provided in most countries allowing people to express their opinions, ideas or beliefs without the fear of repercussion. Freedom of speech promotes democracy and open dialogues. Controlling the freedom of speech to curb hate speeches is a complex issue that many government agencies are pondering upon. It is essentially balancing between the rights and social responsibility. We definitely need freedom to express ourselves. We definitely need diverse and new ideas to come and flourish. Limiting this freedom could lead to suppression of individual rights. There is an increase of hate speeches. With advent of social media, the impact of hate speeches is huge. There is definitely an increase in violence, division and real harm in different parts of world due to hate speeches. If the hate speeches continue without any restriction, it will marginalize the society and do more damage that cannot undone. I have always felt the definition of hate speeches differs from culture to culture, people to people and hence a single definition is not possible. So, should we not restrict the freedom of speech to control hate speeches or are there better alternatives?