Why do people prefer allopathy than homeopathy and ayurveda?

India
December 19, 2006 1:08pm CST
Homeopathy- less costly, take time to cure and the body gets preventive power for sudden changes. Ayurveda- more costly, takes time to cure and body gets more preventive power. Allopathy- somewhat cheap, sudden effect, but the preventive power reduces. What do you think about these?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@DoctorDidi (7018)
• India
13 Apr 12
Every pathy has its limitations. Being myself a homeopath, I feel that all the researches in medical science are made in allopathy. There is no research work in homeopathy, a few may have in ayurveda, I am not sure about it. Allopathy has an immediate effect while homeopathy takes time to act. So people prefer allopathy than homeopathy. As for ayurveda, I have no practical idea or even knowledge to comment about it. What I personally believe as a practitioner homeopathy, is that homeopathy works well in chronic diseases whereas allopathy is ideal for acute whereas. So I always advise people accordingly. As a doctor, I always believe that remedy is the ideal goal and not the pathy you are following.
• India
15 Jun 10
Hello welcome Thanks for sharing, what you tell is very correct. Most people go for the popular ENGLISH MEDICINE, allopathy, never consider the side effects Welcome always. Cheers. Professor
• Gurgaon, India
11 Jul 08
1. Homeopathy strengthens the immune system. Allopathy by use of antibiotics makes it weaker. 2. Homeopathic medicines are tried and trusterd for centuries. Allopathic medicines gets replaced every few years or decades once their side effects getws too obvious.