During a disaster women and children are saved first .Why?

@Augustta (1850)
Poland
April 19, 2007 4:13am CST
I know this can sound silly,but i was thinking my self "why" and first though which come in my mind was...women and children is also deemed less capable of self-survival.Which if the only alternative is death.It is because women are special, and without them we men would be lost.(lol) But what is your point of view? I wait for both women and men reply...and yes,i can accept a funny response also...(i can imagine some)...
6 people like this
10 responses
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
21 Apr 07
i think its some outmoded view of chivalry. The idea that women, just like children have to be protected, that they are too weak to be able to look after themselves. Its quite insulting really blessed be
2 people like this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
21 Apr 07
ha ha! i am amazed about you thinking this way...but i know that you can have right! augusta
@RobinJ (2501)
• Canada
20 Apr 07
At one time women were considered the only way a tribe could continue because she gave birth to the children of the tribe, Any man can start a child but only certain women of child baring age can have a child. A tribe could easily survive if it consisted of 10 women and 2 men, where as 10 men and two woman the chance of that tribe surviving were small. As well the children were important as they were the next generation that would carry on the tribe. I think the idea of women as being less than was never considered, If you read you history the woman were the ones who did every thing except hunt down and kill the food and even then some were allowed to. In those days the survival of the tribe, was paramount and steps were taken to see to that and that is why women and children first came about.
• United States
1 May 07
RobinJ, very good synopsis! Now, let's see if we can manage to pass on this view to all our men out there! What wonderful societies we will all have!
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
20 Apr 07
thank you robinj,i can't add nothing! augusta
1 person likes this
• United States
21 Apr 07
Men have been known to be physically strong and more muscularly built so they would usually be known as 'protectors'. This is why women and children would usually be the ones to be saved first because it's been known that men should protect them (just like protecting their families) and that men could save themselves with their brawn. Another reason is that women tend to worry or panic because of tendency for emotional outbursts (which could also be hormonal) and that children are the future of the world, so they need all the protection that they could get. Happy myLotting!
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
21 Apr 07
great answer,as usual! rated +!! augusta
@bluewings (3857)
19 Apr 07
Everybody loves the little angels and no one wants to see them suffer.So,saving the babies first is understandable and it's believed that women understand kids better than men do,being their mothers.So,that could be one of the reasons for turning our attention to women first. The second of course is that men can't survive without women.So,even if men survive but women don't ,then men will eventually die,lol.Thus,save the women and then save themsleves,lol.Nah..men are considered sturty and anatomically more capable of defending themselves when compared to women,though this view is changing with time.So,protecting women becomes a priority as men could always get out of there after the babies and the women are safe.
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
19 Apr 07
well,done!i like so much your reply! and the fact you recognize that without women all is in vain...lol augusta
@bluewings (3857)
19 Apr 07
I dare not lie about that,lol.Excuse my typo,I meant 'sturdy' not sturty.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Apr 07
I think it is the way men are raised. They are raised to be protecters. I also think a men are afraid of having to raise the children...I mean I had to work a 24hr shift so my boyfriend had to watch the baby....NOT he stayed at my work with the kids the whole night so that I could do it(yes I know that there are single daddys raising their children) I have noticed their are a lot of old fashion men out there that feel a womens place is home with the kids and a mans place is to protect and provide for them. So this is probly why the save women and children first...but I think it should be reworded to "Children firstand then anyone that can not make it with out help" because if you think about it What if there was a man in a wheelechair? if every one only helps women and children then them selves who will help that man? I feel that if a woman is capible then she should be helping resque the people that need help. I feel that EVERYONE should get a chance not just the women...However, the children come first.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Apr 07
Yeah the funny thing my bayfrien to this day has not changes one of our baby's diapers, also if she starts to cry "Dear she's calling you". What would he do if he had to take care of her himself...if coming to my place of work wasn't in the options...lol
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
20 Apr 07
very good answer and your comment" I also think a men are afraid of having to raise the children..." had me laugh...yes,i never think at this...lol!! thank you, augusta
1 person likes this
@jemimay (38)
• Philippines
21 Apr 07
hmmm.. because women and children's lives our more important than men's life?? lol because children are only given a lesser time to live than men?? because women are in capable of giving birth so we need more women to continue human reproduction?? lol am i right??.. ;-P
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
21 Apr 07
damn!yes you have right a lot! augusta
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
1 May 07
I like RobinJ's simple but truthful response. However, there are people out there who will definitely disagree because of lack of knowledge. Did you know that women have always ruled the world (even in those eras when women are alleged to have had no say about matters). Oh, yeah! Well, let me give you some few examples of our always matriarch world: Biblical characters - Eve, Sarah, Racheal, Rebecca, prophetess Deborah, Queen of Sheba, Queen Esther, wives of king Solomon Current - My mothers, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, Hillary Clinton, etc.
@chiyosan (30184)
• Philippines
19 Apr 07
well i have thought about this before, but one thing only came to mind, because women and children needs to be taken cared of and not like men who can generally run faster than children and women. :)
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
19 Apr 07
well,is a point of view... thank you for the reply. augusta
@4ftfingers (1310)
20 Apr 07
I'm sure this might have been said already but i think it's because traditionally, culturally and naturally the child is the most important member of the family. Then to the child the mother is the most important - as the nurturer.
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
20 Apr 07
Thank you for the comment! augusta
@Nardz13 (5055)
• New Zealand
20 Apr 07
Hi Augustta. Now you got me thinking, because I hear that too, and now I would like to know, wether its an old fashion thing, or like you said, maybe they say women and children are less capable, interesting question... Keep them coming lol...
1 person likes this
@Augustta (1850)
• Poland
20 Apr 07
thank you for the pareciative comment.. yes i was thinking why? augusta