sachin &sourav

India
May 7, 2007 10:04pm CST
well the most recent hottest discussion is SACHIN & SOURAV the q that arises is whats up? i feel thats its in favour of ourteam that NON PERFORMERS R KEPT OUT.but on the other han its not worth speaking that its time 4 them to go no no thats totallly wrong they themselves hav the right to decide this.and what i think is they sitll hav a lot of game left.ONE MORE THING THAT I FEEL IS THAT KEEPING DRAvid in squad is a wrong discussion he should also be rested.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@vivek2006 (1419)
• India
11 May 07
Thats why BCCI stated that these two have been rested and not dropped. But its absolute stupid of BCCI to have your key players rested against a team that virtually knocked us out of the world cup. For now BCCI looks in experimental mood and they wanna give guys like Sehwag and few youngsters another chance so they decided that they will bring back Sourav and Sachin after this one day series. Sachin and Saurav are too good in quality and class to be dropped so i ask all indian fans to be patient with them and we'll see them in full flow very soon as their pride would have been hurt too after the demise in the world cup. So don't worry there are better days ahead.
1 person likes this
• India
9 May 07
i think sachin and sourav is the key of indian team i thought both are playing well and they must in indian oneday team for bang.tour if you want to rest some one that is rahul, sehwag and dhoni they need rest because they haven't in good form.
1 person likes this
• India
9 May 07
I don't think that it's right for them to stay out of the team, because i think it's not them but the fault of the coach because i am seeing all the indian players and if a particular player is making a mistake, he goes on continues to make it and is not corrected at all, he repeats his mistakes again and again, which reflect that the coach is not doing his duty. I have a firm bielieve in ravi shastri and robin singh thus i think that if they both had went they could have learn a lot from them.
1 person likes this
@sonone (269)
• India
8 May 07
Hi There! This is Nitin. Nice to have a discussion with you. As started by you, SACHIN & SOURAV were the best players in 1990's. Where sachin was the masterblaster and ganguly has his own stylre of batting. They both had a great patnership during the captionship of Ganguly. This happened when they were younger and fit body. But that time has been gone. Where tendulkar hits the century and ganguly hit's the ball outta the stadium. Nowadays, u don't find team work in the cricket team of india. Rahul boasts himself, sachin never get's down as he says " Nobody in the past named be bad n who r u to name me?" to chappell the coach. There's no co-operation in the team. Kapil said to media that "I know that Dravid is jealous on coming back of Ganguly". India has always been to final during the captainship of Ganguly. Ganguly & Sachin not being in the good form it's good for them to stay at home and have rest. Atlast whole india wishes to win the cup or the match. For that india need a good team and not a team that was in the previous time but need a team that will run now and for the future. BCCI is doing a good job by appointing a new cricketers and kickin' out the old riped players.
• India
8 May 07
Yes math wat u told is correct keeping all the seniour players out of the game is correct keeping some out and some inside is not the correct decision and if team must come on track the players must play for india not for money!
1 person likes this
@banta78 (4335)
• India
11 May 07
I feel the indian cricket board is keen on building a team for the future. And so after much deliberation with former well known players and skippers of India they decided that we should have an experienced captain who will lead a young team to bangladesh. So they rested sachin and sourav inorder to give chance to newcomers like manoj tewari. I feel sachin adn sourav still have some cricket left in them and will surely bounce back hopefully in tests in bangladesh. I feel selection process should be made more transparent so the merit should be sole criteria.