The US needs to standardize their assistance for needy families.

@wiccania (3360)
United States
August 28, 2007 5:08pm CST
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Now, there are some states where people can just keep having kids, not working and getting welfare checks to live off of. Then there are states where you have to bend over backwards for minimal assistance. For example, I'm a single mom. I get food stamps and a little bit of assistance on my utility bill during the winter months. It's very helpful, and I'm not complaining. But when I was on the verge of losing the apartment my son and I were in a couple of months ago, there was no assistance I could be given. The assistance either didn't exist or they'd already paid out everything they had in the budget. I asked about temporary housing and was told that there were places that they could put us for 1 week. Which really isn't enough time for anyone to even start getting back on their feet. That's Colorado. In New Jersey, my younger sister who is also a single mom, also has need of the assistance programs. She had an injury in a car accident a few years ago that makes her incapable of working any job that requires her to stand on her feet for more than 40 minutes at a time. For almost 3 years, she's been living in a hotel and receiving food stamps. They provide childcare at a day care center while she goes to school (on a scholarship). I realize that there are always going to be budget issues in things like this. But I think that it would be better if there were more programs that helped people to get back on their feet permanently, and if the same types of assistance were offered from state to state. You know what I mean?
6 people like this
13 responses
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
28 Aug 07
I don't know much about public assistance. Is it federal or state granted? If it is the state who generates the funds to pay for assistance then that could be why your sister gets more than you. I would guess that New Jersey residents generate more funds than Colorado residents. If it is federal then it should be standardized with more restictions. Such as you get assistance for one child. I know some scumbags who have 8 kids just for the money. It has to be restricted. If it were not for people like that you would probably be able to go to school for free.
3 people like this
• United States
28 Aug 07
Actually its separated by State, and then by county. I think the only thing that is funded by the goverment is Social Security and SSDI. The money for public assistance usually comes from the state, and its set by the cost of living in each state, so although a person in one state with one child may get more cash assistance than another parent of one in another state, its basically the same amount because it will buy the same amount of necessities in each respective region.
1 person likes this
@eden32 (3973)
• United States
30 Aug 07
As I understand it the food stamps program & medicaid are federal programs, but cash assistance & housing are most often state programs. One of the logical reasons why guidelines aren't established on a federal level is because the average cost of living varies greatly from state to state. Just compare housing expenses, my home in Massachusetts was close to $300,000 5 years ago when we bought it. My best friend in Texas has a home of comparable size with several times the amount of land with it, her home was less than half of my home. So if we were to state a family of 3 needs $500 a month in housing, in Texas there would be no problem finding housing in that range in Massachusetts you couldn't buy a tent & put it at a campsite for a month with that. Many states have now established caps on both how many children you can have & receive assistance and on how long you can collect.
• United States
29 Sep 07
The money and housing are provided for by the State, but regulated by the Feds. So, each state has to pass laws and regulations that meet Federal regulations so that they can get Federal money (for anything). In theory, it's a state's issue. But in reality, the feds are pulling the purse strings. From what I understand states are now being forced to remove a lot of families from the medicaid rolls because the federal government is cutting the budget. That's just an example.
• United States
28 Aug 07
I know what you mean. My father in law can't work because he was in an accident and it messed his legs up. He had to get some of the bone cut off one leg so now his legs aren't even. He has to have his shoes built up so he can stand even. And he can't hardly sleep at night because his legs hurt him so bad. He finally got put on disability but it doesn't pay a lot. His wife (my step mother in law) works as a cook at a restaurant. They are having a hard time right now with money and they still have a 19 year old living at home. They can't get help with food stamps because they say she makes 5 cent an hour too much. They don't have a vehicle so she has to have people take her to work and pick her up. They rent their house cause they can't afford to buy a house. Now Medicare or Medicaid (I believe that's who it was, I could be wrong, I'm not sure) came in and decreased my father in law's money that he gets because they said my brother in law graduated high school. And now my father in law can't hardly even pay for his medicines. I just don't understand why the government is like that. Sometimes they don't help the people that really need it.
3 people like this
• United States
29 Aug 07
I know exaclty what you mean..and whats even sadder is that where i live in Pa..in our town they pick and choose themselves who gets what..just depending on if they like you or not,i know from experience..like my friend and i went threw the same thing with no fathers in the picture..she wasnt working and i was waiting for Social security..i got $176 a mth in cash for bills..hell my rent is 560..and 100 in food..she made more money than me and she got $300 in food..both have one kid..same exact circumstances..how is that right? and there have been other exapmles i have been toldand its wrong..but we do however have a place that helps people get jobs and also train them for work..which is good for everyone..but..the system is a joke most of the time..the more kids u have, and not ever working a day in there life.. the more help they get and more surprises and hidden help..instead of those that really need it..and it just angers me..they system really only works for very few that need it..there just is no justice is there hun? great topic btw! take care!
1 person likes this
@kelly60 (4547)
• United States
29 Aug 07
Some of the assistance may vary from state to state or even from county to county, but from what I have seen, your worker may also have a lot to do with it. One young family I know had a worker who told them that they could not get any help with a heat shut-off, food or any of the other necessities. They moved to a neighboring county for about a month, and were able to get the assistance they needed there. When they transferred back to the original county they got a new worker who was able to get them the assistance they needed in their original county as well. It wasn't that they didn't qualify. The other worker could have gotten these benefits for them too if she had wanted to.
@vicki2876 (5636)
• Canada
28 Aug 07
It would be nice if your government could make assistance a federal thing where all states have the same standards. Here in Canada I have in the past been on assistance and I tell you it is a big hole that is so hard to get out of. I would love to see them put more money into getting us off the system then making every personal effort you make a punishment basically. I see many people here who abuse the system and I used to feel anger about it because I was so honest and even kids would make fun of my poor kids. But now I understand that our system is very messed up and does not give any incentives to people to get off the system and people do what they have to in order to survive. Good luck! I hope things will get better for you! Vicki
3 people like this
• United States
30 Aug 07
They don't need to standardize it. They need to abolish it. I think it is a shame that people would use their child as an excuse not to work. Welfare rats act like they didn't know that they needed money to raise a child. Contraceptives are less expensive than raising a child. I bet if there was no welfare there would be less children in the USA. Why do they get money for free and I have to work and pay taxes so these parasites can suck from the system. It isn't my fault they had a child they were not willing to support. So why should I have to pay?
1 person likes this
@wiccania (3360)
• United States
30 Aug 07
And what about people who can't work? I have a special needs child. When he gets home from school, I have to be here. Which means that the hours during which I'm able to work are 8am to 2pm, Monday through Thursday. I also don't have a car, so it's gotta be somewhere in walking distance. Which leaves a gas station, a donut shop, a l!quor store and a dry cleaner. I have no issue with working at any of those places, but are they going to hire me if I can't work evenings or weekends? Or holidays for that matter? I'm hopeful, but realistic. Yes, people who think "well I'll just have another kid and stay on welfare" do abuse the system. But there are people with legitimate need as opposed to a desire to just stay home and sit on their @sses all day.
@wiccania (3360)
• United States
13 Sep 07
I spent more than 10 years paying into the system by working at least 1 full time job (for 5 of those years I worked 2 full time jobs at a time). Now I have trouble finding a job because of my hour requirements. How does that make me a bad person who's using my child as an excuse not to work?
• United States
6 Sep 07
Why should the system be burdened with the problems of those who do not contribute? It is the working people who will pay.
@jeanena (2198)
• Bucklin, Kansas
29 Aug 07
One thing they do in Kansas is cut off cash assistance after 60 months. Cant ever get it again as far as i have been told. The paper trail isnt as long here as it is in some places but it is long enough. Now days you have phone interviews which also helps. I read in tbhe discussion that some states vary by county . And I think that one worker should be investigated it is wrong to choose case to case.
@vhansen (2029)
• United States
27 Sep 07
I know exactly what you mean.I've seen people who really needed help passed over and others get it that didn't need or deserve it.When my sister needed assistance she was denied because she owned property.They allowed she wasn't too bad off or she'd sell it.Now what kind of B.S is that? My mother had a massive heart attack and had to have her left leg amputated at the knee as a result of poor circulation.She was denied disablity.They told her she was still able to hold a desk job! On the other hand I know a family here in town that gets all kinds of assistance:housing,utility,food stamps etc.Which would be fine except that both the husband and wife work 'off the books' for cash.They've been investigated several times because people have turned them in but always manage to get out of it somehow.It's a screwed up system at best and really needs a overhaul.
@cblackink (969)
• United States
16 Sep 07
I totally agree with you about standardization. The state I live in (NC) has regulations that sound a lot like yours. Like, I was unemployed and about to get evicted. I spent half a day there trying to get some kind of help, only to be told they had already spent their entire budget for that month and no more would be available until the first of the next month.
@adidas7878 (1891)
• United States
9 Sep 07
yea the us really need to do something, they should make alot of things standarder, ever seem the movie " bowling for columbin?" the story is sad but very true. take flint michiagn for exsample, it used to be a great town, but after the ford company left there the whole town went to also a third country there, not much assisants from the govement, the place went horrible crime rate, way up and no one there to help. too sad
• United States
28 Aug 07
Mmm-mmm you have struck a good point there!!! In Hamilton county Ohio, you only get three years to be on cash assistance, and then the only way that you can recieve any further cash assistance is to have a "hardship" case, which will be determined my your caseworker and however nasty she feels like being!!! Or you can have more children so you will have four kids under the age of 13 and they will give you cash assistance. Why would you reward those who are milking the system by continually having kids, while the parents who are out there struggling with their two or three kids are kicked in the booty while their down Another thing I can't stand is the paperwork. My nickname for the Job and Family Services here is the papermill. I receive food stamps and medical assistance for myself and my two children. I dread having to go to a recertification appointment (which I have to do this Thursday, oy!!!) Here is the scenario for paperwork. First, they send me a letter that states that around the 17th of the month that they will send me another letter with my appointment date. Why don't you just send me the appointment. Then before I get that letter, they send another letter, the front saying that I should have received my appointment letter (which at this point I haven't) and telling me how to reschedule. This letter has a household verification form and an employment verification form for me to get filled out to bring with me. Then, about a week before my appointment (hopefully) I get my appointment letter. This is only after I have called my caseworker about 50 times to find out when my appointment is, and her never returning my messages because she never answers the phone. I get the forms filled out, plus get a typed up statement from my grandmother to state that she charges me rent for living here. (She can't just fill out the household verification, because she is a relative and lives in the same house, despite her being my landlord as well) Finally, the day comes for me to go to the appointment. I get there an hour early just in case there is a cancellation and I can get there early. I sit there for an hour and a half, and after realizing that my appointment time has past, I go to the receptionist to see what is the problem. She e-mails my caseworker, and she replies that she called me five minutes like she was supposed to (*Note: My mother is there with me, and was there during the one time I got up. I also have a pager, which is supposed to go off when I am called. This pager never went off.) so then she tells me that I may have to reschedule because it is so late. She says she will be right out, but never comes. I leave, angry, not only because I wasn't called, but because if I want to continue receiving food stamps and medical, I have to go through this process all over again!!! What is it about caseworkers that makes them act as though they are giving the assistance out of their own pocket? Before I get too far off subject I will end this post by saying a lot of the problems in welfare would be solved if they would have a universal way of doing their services. The only thing that would have to vary is the amount of cash assistance by each state's cost of living, because it would be unfair for everyone to go by the lowest states cost of living, and unfair to the taxpayers to go by the highest.
1 person likes this
@aseretdd (13730)
• Philippines
19 Sep 07
You are lucky that you live in a country where assistance is given to those who are in need... in my country even if you are like paralyze with no means of earning a living and no family to take care of you... the only option is to beg in the streets... Although this assistance thing can be abused by some... still that is not an excuse for assisting other who are really in need... this program may vary from state to state but still... i admire your government for taking this initiative...
@msjigga (864)
• United States
19 Sep 07
Thank you sop much for starting this discussion. I am a single Mom of 2. I lost my job in January My 1yr old just had heart surgery and I was unable to work until this month because of her condition. I receive food stamps, and medical assistance, and help during winter months. I live of Child Support payments because my expected Child support payments are more than what it would be if I was collecting cash payments from welfare. My apartment was ruled unhealthy per the Health Department. I do not get any rental assistance from the State so I cannot get any help with getting a healthy place to live. If I were on cash assistance already I would qualify for a onetime rental assistance payment to find a new home, I do not have good credit because I have not been working nor have I been getting consistant support payment like I was suppose to so I have bad credit so I can get a home, and I have no money for 1st months rent or security deposit so I am stuck until place is condemned landlord has until tomorrow to fix all problems but landlord has done nothing so I am screwed. If I was on section 8 or substidized housing I could just transfer to a new home but I am not so I am on my own and I do not know what to do. Section 8 list are closed ( no new apps are being accepted) I would qualify now before when list were open my income was too high. I the system is messed up because I have alot of friends who are on all programs public assistance has to offer and they are not at all struggling and nor are they motivated to get off. I have 1 friend who told Me that she is better off working part time than working full time and struggling for nothing. I was in shocked but when I took a good look at her situation she was right she works part time and still gets food stamps, low cost quality housing, free utilities, free medical, free childcare, free lunches, free clothing allowances, free transportation (bus passes and free car program), free furniture, free braces on her kids teeth, and tuition free schooling... Imagine that. If she worked full time she would have to pay for everything income would be too high for help.