More Proof that the Press is Incompetent!

No, he hadn't before Michigan, yet he was still leading in delegates.

Just because he has more delegates doesn't mean that the other states will swing that way. You have to remember that Huckabee winning in Iowa and McCain winning in New Hampshire is what the public sees. A lot of people vote based on the media. Unfortunately... www.ronpaul2008.com

I agree. I'm not a Romney fan at all, but he doesn't get that much press coverage. However, neither does Ron Paul. I find that pretty interesting. He wasn't invited to the Fox Republican Forum, yet Thompson and Guiliani, who trailed behind him in every primary, were invited. He gets VERY little coverage on news stations. He's gotten better coverage on Jay Leno than on Fox or CNN combined. He may not win, but at least his message is out there. I'll still write him in rather than voting for the incompetent buffoons running against him.

Romney has the most delegates, which means he is winning. But you're right, blind, deaf and stupid voters only care about what the incompetent press tells them. He won a primary (Wyoming). It counts just as much as NH, but the incompetent press ignored it completely. Why? Apparently they would have to leave their bar stool to cover it. This is the least decided primary in recent history, and the incompetent press hates it. Why? Because in their stewed little brains they think they get to decide it, and their glory babies aren't just sweeping it. Romney isn't my favorite, but I'd much rather see him win on merit than lose because the incompetent presses' propaganda against him.