Archbishop of Canterbury
By sephrenia
@sephrenia (567)
February 11, 2008 5:45am CST
Okay then, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams has caused a storm of controversy in the UK by apparently saying that we should accept parts of Sharia Law in the UK. What are your thoughts on this?
I don't want to start a catfight but I would like to know what other people think. Obviously the Archbishop has a bad case of foot in mouth at the best of times and is currently trying to backtrack over his original statements but many are calling for his resignation, including members of the church.
I do think that Sharia doesn't really have a place in the UK as English law already stands and Sharia would clash in soooooo many ways that it's not even funny. I also wonder what the Muslim population think about this as it is they who would be most affected if it were to somehow become a reality.
I look forward to reading your replies :)
1 person likes this
3 responses
@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
11 Feb 08
Well, I don't know what the Archbishop was thinking. In any case I think it would be a very bad idea to implement parts of Sharia law in any Western Society. Women have fought long and hard to gain equality. It is still not achieved 100% and Sharia law would be a step backwards. I live in Canada in the province of Ontario and there was a lot of pressure a couple of years ago to permit arbitration in family matters under Sharia law. The reason for this demand was that by longstanding tradition orthodox Jews always could have their cases arbitrated by a rabbi and presented to family court. Jewish ladies never objected to this since in the orthodox tradition women are in high regard and fared really well in divorce and custody cases. When the same right was demanded for cases to be arbitrated by Sharia law there was much opposition, also by progressive Muslim women who feared that if forced by their families to take part in this they would be treated unjustly. The upshot of it was that Ontario passed a law that all family cases must be decided in Family Court and no where else.
I also read a recent case in Germany where a Moroccan woman, living in Germany wanted a divorce because her husband beat her regularly. The German judge took the position that since beating your wife under certain circumstances was allowed by the Koran it was not grounds for divorce. There was such an outcry that the judge was excused from this case.
To come to a speedy conclusion my opinion is that in the UK, Canada and other Western countries there are already laws in place that deal with most problems and additions to these laws that are alien to the Western culture would only create more problems in an already troubled world.
1 person likes this
@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
11 Feb 08
Oh, and I wanted to add that if the Archbishops expressed his private thoughts he should not be forced to resign, but since he is such a public figure he should be very careful in what he says publicly.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
•
12 Feb 08
Of course, he should be free to say what he likes, as long as he makes it clear he is not speaking as a representative of the Church, we are a free country. We must, however, have one law for everyone.
all the best urban
1 person likes this
@headhunter525 (3548)
• India
11 Feb 08
He was sharing his personal thoughts so I don't think he needs to resign. After all he is a human being too. But one may say that being the Archbishop he should be more responsible. And I would agree with that. But then just because he shared his thoughts that does not mean people people are being killed and so on. So I would say that though many disagree, including me, I would not call him to quit. Thanks.
1 person likes this