A Question about Mylot Etiquette!

@kamran12 (5526)
Pakistan
March 31, 2008 7:43pm CST
You start a discussion which is not under debating interest but a serious one anyway. Now, users give their individual responses and then a user comments under another responder challenging his/her view, not in rude manner, but positively! You, the discussion starter, have your own views about the issue! Now, will you leave the right of first response to the user to whom the comment was directed or you will jump in before that user could respond to the comment? I, personally, leave the right of first response to the intended user i.e. to whom the comment was directed but I sincerely look forward to all perspectives and reasons why or why not you would jump in first! Thanks!
9 people like this
12 responses
• United States
1 Apr 08
I think you're right on the money. Even though you started the discussion, it's polite to let the person that got commented on to respond first.
2 people like this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello deannatroupe!:-) I could not understand 'right on the money' thing, is this a form of expression? if so, I'll be pleased to be educated, really! I look at it the same way as you that it's more polite to let other respond first but I thought I may not be doing the best thing. Thanks for sharing your views!:-)
• United States
5 Apr 08
"Right on the money" is an idiomatic expression we use in English, it means that what you've said is exactly right. Another one is "you've hit the nail on the head."
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
12 Apr 08
Thank you, ThePaintGuru, your explanation was helpful!:-)
• United States
1 Apr 08
I would not jump in as long as they are not attacking the person directly, or being rude. If they are peacefully debating this person's view, I would leave it to that person to debate. This place is the spirit of healthy debate, so to interfere would go against the spirit of MyLot. Although further debate would probably entice me to join in this section of discussion, I would not jump in first if someone responded to them.
2 people like this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello drknlvly6781!:-) I was thinking along the same lines, where I consider it an obligation to call out on rude remarks, I do think it disrespectful to not allow other responder to defend first. I would certainly like to give my input afterwards. I also wondered what if the responder do not respond at all, which actually is the motivation of starting this discussion as it happened in one of my earlier discussions! Thanks for sharing!:-)
@Darkwing (21583)
1 Apr 08
I suppose it depends how you look at the word "discussion". If you were in a room, which dozens of other people, discussing an issue, you would hold your hand up for turn of opinion, right? Then, the person who was in charge of the discussion would give you permission to put your view. Now, because Mylot is done in a different way, this cannot happen, so I would say that if somebody put their opinion in on another response, which was directed at the person who started the discussion, then the person who started the discussion should be able to decide whether he answers before the respondent answers the previous opinion. In other words, if you own the discussion, then you can choose to speak when you like, and nobody should argue with that. It's not rude... you're controlling your discussion as is the guy in the live discussion. Brightest Blessings.
@Darkwing (21583)
2 Apr 08
Again, you have control and if you want to give an opinion on that response to another respondent, then you have the right to do it. It's your discussion... your decision, my friend.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 08
Thank you Darkwing, for coming back to add your valuable input!:-)
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 08
Hello Darkwing!:-) Thank you for illustrative example!:-) "if somebody put their opinion in on another response, which was directed at the person who started the discussion, then the person who started the discussion should be able to decide whether he answers before the respondent answers the previous opinion" (italic added) I understand to respond first as a discussion starter as it is directed towards me. My question is what your action will be if it is directed towards another responder, not at me as discussion starter!? Thanks you for sharing and I would appreciate if you give your opinion in that situation!:-)
• United States
2 Apr 08
If the question was meant for a specific person , then I wouldn't answer. But if it is an open question, a question for anyone to answer, I would answer it.I have had a great three way conversation.it was started by a friend. There was a question that was open but it was in a comment box.Another friend answer it. She started her post asking if it was okay if she step into the discussion. Of course I said yes and all three of us had a great discussion.So as long as you are not butting in, you should post your comment.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Apr 08
That's the one. How did you know? Cyntrow did it the correct way.It wasn't rude and she got to comment on the discussion and really added something to the post.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 08
I myself participated in that discussion and saw your comments. It was a good discussion and yes, she did it the right way and I find her an intelligent and a good mylot fellow! Thanks for coming back, sarah!:-)
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 08
Hello sarahruthbeth22!:-) It's interesting that you should mention an open question, and that would certainly change the situation but isn't it less likely that a responder will comment under another responder with an open question? though I admit that the possibility is there. Are you talking about the adoniah's discussion where you, cyntrow and adoniah discussed religious beliefs and practices and difficulties involved? if that was it, it surely was an interesting discussion. Excuse me if I got it wrong! Thanks for sharing!:-)
1 person likes this
• Regina, Saskatchewan
1 Apr 08
I usually let the second responder get answered by the first, first, if you know what I mean. lol I would only comment before if I knew both people really well and knew it wouldn't cause any problems. Some of my best discussions get going in totally new directions when more than one responder goes in under a comment.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello sparkofinsanity!:-) Your point about commenting first if you know both well and if you think it wouldn't cause problem is interesting and quite understandable now that I think about it! Thanks for bringing it up and sharing your views!:-)
1 person likes this
• Regina, Saskatchewan
1 Apr 08
No probs kamran. I'm a firm believer in politeness, but I find with friends, there is more leeway because they understand that it's not lack of manners, but being comfortable enough to get in each other's way without getting in each other's way, if you know what I mean. Sort of like being part of a family and more relaxed about formalities.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
You make good sense to me, spark! I wonder what motivated you for your screen name as I have yet to see any insanity from your side. And honestly, I wonder if I would 'ever' see it!
1 person likes this
• United States
5 Apr 08
Well, I might respond if I thought I wouldn't be back soon. It's easy to reply to two comments at once, I just go: - NAME Response - NAME Response It's not a perfect system, but it works :).
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
5 Apr 08
Time can be an important factor, ThePaintGuru! and when the other user has responded, I, too, use the same scheme like yours, usually! Thanks for sharing!:-)
@avonrep1 (1862)
• United States
1 Apr 08
I am the type of person to tell people what I think and why. Not to start a word fight or anything, but to show their are many different beliefs. I will tell them what I think of any issue that I start. I also have a bad habit of doing it in others peoples discussions too. To me its all about getting people to think about things in a different way. I avoid religous topics for the most part, because they always get offended with what I have to say, then they stalk me and rate me with a negative rating just because they don't like my opinion on something. We use to refer to those as mylot stalkers. I went inactive for a while because of it, was getting sick of it. Seems they have stopped, but I stay away from those topics now....
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello avonrep1!:-) I believe that the very purpose of this forum is to share ideas and beliefs without being attacked, if they are genuine and shared in respectful manner. With so many different people from so many different countries, it's only natural that people will have very different views on issues surrounding us and one should accept it. I am sorry that you were rated negative, which has become a common practice among those who can't really argue face to face. Though it has happened to me too, but I don't stay away from the same topics and discussions. It's a choice and I respect yours! Thanks for sharing!:-)
• India
1 Apr 08
it depends Kamran. Sometimes when I am scrolling down responses, I come across some very interesting responses and comments and I understand that a series of comments is going on between two people. Sometimes I think better of barging in but sometimes the comments have stopped at such a stage and where the first responder has not commented back. I generally see the time lapse i.e. if the last comment was made say 10 minutes back, then I don’t jump in and leave my comments as it is expected that the first responder would comment back maybe. But if say 1 or 2 days have passed, then I usually drop in my own comments as I feel that the original responder may no longer be interested in continuing the discussion. So my comment then is aimed mainly at the person to responded last and to his/her point of views.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello sudiptacallingu!:-) You have brought up an important point and that was the motivation of this discussion, that while I choose to respect other responser's right to defend first, should I not comment if the first responder choose not to comment/defend at all!? So, you take it that after 1 or 2 days, it's fine to drop in if the first responder don't reply back to comment! That may be a balanced way to deal such problem. I'll think about it! Thanks for sharing your views!:-)
@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
2 Apr 08
As long as the responder is appropriate I leave the right of first response to the person whom the post is directed to. I will only respond first if the user is inappropriate. Usually I'll write something along the lines of, "If you do that again I'll report you to myLot. But after first response I feel like as a discussion starter I have the right to say whatever I want.
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
3 Apr 08
Hello cripfemme!:-) Yes, in case of inappropriate comment, I do agree with you that discussion starter should step in to warn or call out on the rude responder. And, when other responder has responded, I would also feel comfortable to voice my opinion. Thanks for sharing!:-)
@Sissygrl (10912)
• Canada
3 Apr 08
sometimes i answer before the person who started teh discsussion gets a chance to, if i feel i need to answer the person, or if the person whom answered is my friend ;) lately i have just been struggling to catch up and stay caught up with my friends discussion that i havent had time though!
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
3 Apr 08
Hello Sissygrl!:-) I hope you would be enjoying your time with the little one!:-) Yes, I think if it's a friend then it may not pose any problems or may not mean any disrespect. Catching up can prove to be a tough task, just relax and go with the time and mood! Thanks for sharing!:-)
• Philippines
2 Apr 08
Under debating interest, I believe I give some pinch of my opinion on the opening of the discussion. As the discussion goes and the replies add up, I'll express my opinion according to each of the responses. Of course, I'll be open to different perspectives and opinions too but I'll also try to defend my own opinion. Who knows, I might change my opinion once I encountered something more powerful that what I am thinking of? I think I've been liking this discussions lately. :) They challenge me and I reflect on what I really believe. It makes me see the real me. :)
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 08
Hello cr0ssf41r13!:-) It's good to have opinions, every normal human should have opinions and I really appreciate that you are open to accepting other ideas if they are convincing! My question was particularly related to a situation where one responder comments under another responder challenging his/her opinion, 'in positive manner'. Now, should you jump in before the other responder defend his opinion or would you stay out until the other responder replies to that comment? Thanks for sharing!:-)
@cdparazo (5765)
• Philippines
1 Apr 08
You are very courteous if you are like that my friend. There are times that I really just butt in and doesn't think twice of expressing myself. I guess I am just not that polite. LOL! If I have something to say, I really couldn't hold myself and wait for the person to respond.
1 person likes this
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
1 Apr 08
Hello cdparazo!:-) Thank you for your kind words. I haven't ever seen you impolite, neither in your own discussion nor while you respond to others. So, it's hard for me to believe that you are any less polite. Like another user said, I think if one knows other users quite well and thinks that it will not cause a problem, then it may not be disrespectful. I personally choose to try to give other person a chance to defend first. Thanks for sharing!:-)