McCain - Maverick or Gambler

Is McCain a Gambling - This is an image that links politics and gambling.
@4magoo (396)
September 27, 2008 7:46am CST
I saw a short note on a blog posing the question of whether or not McCain is a Maverick or a Gambler. The definition of a maverick is a nonconformist, eccentric, individualist, rebel, one of a kind or "odd man out." A gambler is someone who wages money or other items of value on uncertain events, dependent either wholly or in part on chance. It appeals to the human desire for gain and the thrill of uncertainty or risk. As I read those definitions and I look at two big errors of judgement on the part of McCain, I believe that he has to be looked on as a gambler. For example, McCain chose Palin. She gave his campaign a shot in the arm but she wasn't fully vetted. To my way of thinking, this was a wild gamble on McCain's part that "seemed" to give his campaign a boost. He was gambling and I believe he was gambling the fate of the nation on a person he really didn't fully know. We can now see that she is not the best pick as a VP. Republican writers are even suggesting that she pull out of the race. As to his charging into Washington to try and look as the hero and solve the bailout talks, that was a gamble. He didn't care that it could negatively effect negotiations. He was gambling that it would give him a boost and propel his campaign forward. We have learned that imposing election politics into the discussions was a show stopper. No one wants to seem to give the "other guy" the "look" at have solving any problems. He lost on that gamble and it was a gamble. Bottom line is this. I don't think McCain is proving himself to be a Maverick. I think he is proving that he is a Gambler. We don't need a gambler as the president of the United States. The question is this. Do you believe that McCain is a Maverick or a Gambler?
2 people like this
4 responses
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
27 Sep 08
Very well put! I think of him as a gambler. One thing that really scares me is his lack of good judgement. And, Palin is one of those bad judements on McCain's part. Have you noticed that they have very different views? Global warming, drilling in ANWR ect ect. I have usually seen a president and vice president share similar views, no they don't agree on everything but they do agree a lot. I think them agreeing upon refusing to allow a woman the right to choose does not amount to anything.
3 people like this
@4magoo (396)
27 Sep 08
I agree... Further,I think he is gambling the fate of our nation on his desire to leave a legacy. He wants to be president and he will gamble our countries future to achieve his personal ends. That is scary.
3 people like this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
27 Sep 08
Very true! I can remember reading many times about him wanting to be in history books and when he couldn't make it into the books for being an admiral he was going to try with politics. I remember thinking back in the 2000 election cycle how great he appeared and how he was much better than Bush but, this time around I don't feel that he is better than Obama.
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
8 Oct 08
Thanks for the best response.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
27 Sep 08
He's both and I think that should be pretty obvious. His attempt to get the bailout passed before the debate was certainly a gamble, but I thought his choice of Palin was a shrewd move by a maverick. It provided an immediate and obvious campaign boost. His maverick behavior is also clear from his history of doing what he thinks is right even when it differs from the views of his own party. Obama on the other hand is a slave to his party 100%, ok 97%, and always has been.
@4magoo (396)
28 Sep 08
Yes, I will agree that he is both. I agree that going to Washington on his white horse was a gamble, but the Palin one was an even bigger gamble. I think he was looking for something to "juice" up his campaign. He looked around and had to make his choice. He hadn't fully vetted Palin but decided it would give him a big boost so he gambled on her. It worked well for quite a long time until all the "things" that should have come out in the vetting proces showed up. 1. The extent of her personal scandal with Troopergate 2. her lack of experience 3. her inability to speak on her feet.
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Sep 08
def a maverick, we need someone like this in the whitehouse right now
@4magoo (396)
27 Sep 08
LOL... now wait a minute. :-) With a name like "EasySideMoney" are you sure you want a Maverick over a Gambler?
28 Sep 08
I used to think pretty highly of McCain. I am hoping, if he becomes President, that the person who ran in 2000, is still there. But I do not admire him as much as I once did. I think he wants to win too badly, and he has compromised himself too much--a bad VP pick being his worst and most disastrous error. Since he is 72 and has had four bouts with melanoma, I don't think a poor VP pick is a minor matter for him.