What energy type should we be developing?
By Jellen
@Jellen (1852)
United States
March 4, 2009 6:23am CST
Should we be more into coal, more into hydro-energy, more into necular energy, or more into wind or solar energies? I have a personal opinion. I would like see more wind and solar energy developments. I'd rather see a wind turbine rotating on the hill, or a solar reflector sitting on a housetop, than a dam across the river or more smog in the atmosphere. What about you? What energy do you think we should be more into developing?
1 response
@ErrollLeVant (4353)
• United States
4 Mar 09
Neuclear is the most efficient and cost effective, and could relieve a lot of problems relatively quickly. But I think we should be working on all fronts instead of becoming dependent on only one or two sources.
