scientist comment on the Quran!

@Gordano (795)
United States
April 30, 2009 7:29pm CST
I think It is a Great thing that Scientists Confirm The Accuracy of The Holy Quran, Here is some Examples; Professor Tejatat Tejasen is the Chairman of the Department of Anatomy at Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Previously, he was the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the same university. During the Eighth Saudi Medical Conference in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Professor Tejasen stood up and said: "I believe that everything that has been recorded in the Quran fourteen hundred years ago must be the truth, that can be proved by the scientific means. Since the Prophet Muhammad could neither read nor write, Muhammad must be a messenger who relayed this truth, which was revealed to him as an enlightenment by the one who is eligible [as the] creator. This creator must be God. Therefore, I think this is the time to say La ilaha illa Allah, there is no god to worship except Allah (God), Muhammadur rasoolu Allah, Muhammad is Messenger (Prophet) of Allah (God)." More comments of Scientists are available at: http://www.islam-guide.com/frm-ch1-1-h.htm Note: The occupations of all the scientists mentioned in this web site were last updated in 1997.
3 people like this
10 responses
@kunizzul (1066)
• Malaysia
1 May 09
alhamdulillah..Islam is the way of life..
2 people like this
@kunizzul (1066)
• Malaysia
1 May 09
alhamdulillah..
2 people like this
@fizanali (478)
• Pakistan
1 May 09
Thanks Gordano for the link and information. I've seen lot of people say that science proves that there is no God. But in fact I think that science helps us even further in realizing the miracles Allah has created as it proves things written in the Holy Quran 14oo years ago. Only those without very thorough knowledge of science try to deny the right path. Atheist especially believe that everything evolved into being and that it was not created but I've seen an article which proved the reverse; As by the fossil record it has been seen that different creature are not seen evolving into other species by means of intermediate states (of creatures) as Darwin had postulated but in fact that a certain species just pops into the seen with no evolutionary history. So it's only a matter of making your knowledge clearer and not going on wrong assumptions.
1 person likes this
@mathss1 (1181)
• United States
1 May 09
http://us1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/13962/AN_84-MILLION-YEAR-OLD_SEAL_SKULL_THAT_DEMOLISHES_THE__ANCESTOR_OF_THE_SEAL__DECEPTION A brand new subject reported on 22 April, 2009, in Nature magazine, and reprinted thereafter in publishing organs such as Associated Press, Reuters, BBC news and National Geographic News, as well as on Turkish web sites such as Radikal and Haber Türk, was the claim that “the supposed terrestrial ancestor of the seal has been discovered.” A fossil belonging to an extinct land-dwelling animal was once again made the tool of Darwinist speculation and a scenario regarding the fossil based on extensive use of the imagination resulted. This land-dweller, given the name of “Puijila Darwin” and possessed of four legs and a tail, was described as a transitional form “swimming with four feet” and “with a tail serving no purpose” in order to fit in with the Darwinist scenario. The scientific evidence that refutes this huge deception may be set out as follows: With this fossil, Darwinists maintain that the fictitious “terrestrial” ancestor of the seal was a semi-developed transitional form that lived on land some 24 million years ago. Just two of the millions of proofs that this claim IS A HUGE FRAUD are enough to definitively refute this false claim. These are: 1. AN 84-MILLION-EAR-OLD SPOTTED SEAL FOSSIL skull and ....... The BBC article http://www.darwinistdictatorship.com/index.php While the BBC link suggest a completely different story http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8012322.stm
1 person likes this
@mathss1 (1181)
• United States
1 May 09
@Jouhar (409)
• India
1 May 09
Thanks brother ! I like the science in quran. Its astronomy has attracted me a lot.
2 people like this
@kunizzul (1066)
• Malaysia
1 May 09
alhamdulillah..
1 person likes this
@mathss1 (1181)
• United States
1 May 09
Gr8
1 person likes this
@uath13 (8192)
• United States
1 May 09
Um...or someone else could have just wrote down what he was saying or the whole thing could be a work of fiction. The argument lacks any scientific backing.
@urbandekay (18278)
21 Jul 09
Yet the Quran contains factual pseudo scientific claims that have been shown irrefutably to be wrong. Much of the so called scientific claims of the Quran were copied from earlier Greek and other texts all the best urban
@awapak (1275)
• Pakistan
1 May 09
Brother,You have brought out an excellent fact about the last divine book,the Holy Quran.No doubt it is the biggest TRUTH on the God's earth.How an illiterate and uneducated person(pbuh)could tell us about tiny creatures living in bottom of fathomless seas,without going to sea shore and diving??How could he tell us how a child is created in his mother's womb.......without solid informations from the CREATOR who created all these things? Thanks for this great contribution.Please keep writing such things......
@ulalume (713)
• United States
2 May 09
I see absolutely no bias in this report. Granted I did not open the link, because I am just assuming that the quote before me is one of some importance to you. As a scientist he should be looking for logical ways to explain things. He can not test Muhammad. If I were him (as a scientist one should always be skeptical without REAL proof), I would just assume that Muhammad could read and write.