Censorship and the like

Tweet

I recently read an article that discussed two things. First, that censoring the internet violates free speech and secondly that the Children's Internet Protection Act is unconstitutional. Since the two often intertwine, the questions were posed in one article. Now I have never agreed with censorship in anyway but instead believe that it is up to the parents to be aware of what their children are reading, watching, and doing. At the same time I understand that parents (being one myself) can't always be where their children are. It is impossible to be looking over their shoulder 24 hours a day. Which is why I applaud all the tools at our disposal now that try to help us keep our children from seeing things that we don't want them to. There are parental controls on everything now. The only thing unfortunate about them is that kids seem to find a way around them as soon as we install them. But they do help parents do their job a lot. As for the CIPA, I guess that I really don't see the problem with schools and libraries blocking certain sites. From what I understand, most of what they block are things that children shouldn't be seeing anyway. Now I also understand that it might create a hassle for people who are old enough to choose what it is that they want to look at. But based on the guidelines of what is being blocked, people probably shouldn't be looking at those kinds of things in libraries anyway. Getting to the point however, what do you all think about this? Is censoring the internet a violation of free speech? Why or why not? Do you think CIPA is unconstitutional? Why or why not?