Relieving Corporations of the Responsibilities of Offering Health Benefits

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
August 5, 2009 7:32pm CST
If that was how the current health care debate was framed, how many of you who support it would be screaming against it? Yet the very bills being considered now do just that! How does it feel to support your government's attempts to grant special benefits to those "greedy" corporations? ;~D
1 response
@phildozer (284)
• United States
6 Aug 09
Are you serious?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
6 Aug 09
Actually, I'm using hefty sarcasm to make a point. The very bill you are defending does exactly what I said here. Nowhere does it require an employer to continue offering health benefits. Nowhere does it say that an employer can't make "the public option" part of their benefits package. Actually, now that I think of it, there is one stipulation to that effect. It does allow union shops to maintain any benefits gained through collective bargaining. But any company that isn't unionized is free to throw employees to the "public option" as they wish.