Article One, Section Eight of the US Constitution......

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
August 11, 2009 11:51am CST
enumerates the powers of Congress. Nowhere in there do I see "run government healthcare, set up 'resettlement/inernment camps, or become unanswerable to your constituents by demanding they listen to you". Daniel webster....a statesman of the highest rank in our history said: It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. Thomas Jefferson said: In question of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. It's time to read up on the founding document of our country...it is time for us common citizen to be conversant about what it really says! I remember having to pass a test on what the Constitution said, and what it meant before going into High School, and again once I graduated from High School. Do they even do this anymore....and if you never had to do this, why do you think your school district did not require this of you, a citizen of the US...and soon eligable to vote? Or take an oath to defend this document if drafted or enlisted into the armed services to defend said document?
2 people like this
4 responses
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
11 Aug 09
Technicly it doesn't say anything about it. though many are using the "common welfare" terminology to justify it. I am not totaly oposed to a national healthcare option IF it does not interfere with the rest of the constitution, isn't forced on us, is reasonable, can be paid for and does not effect the quaility and availability of said healthcare and most important, as long as it is run by PEOPLE I TRUST. One other thing to look out for is for them to start using the old "interstate commerce clause" trick. They use this as a fall back for nearly any unconstitutional action they want to impose on the state. They twist it, turn it and reinterpret it 6 ways from sunday to use it as an excuse for another power grab. As to the rest of your post, the constitution is still taught, but it seems the emphasis on it's importance and the deeper meaning and spirit of it is lost these days.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
12 Aug 09
I have a couple of grandkids who have graduated from eighth grade...they didn't have to pass a test. They said to me that they 'talked' about it...is all.
• United States
19 Sep 09
I wasn't required to know anything about the policies, documents, or government of the United States until my senior year in high school, under the title Civics. With some of us 16-19 years in age, able to vote in some cases, or quite close to that age, it is a travesty that we were not taught sooner, and given a deeper understanding of the processes involved in our government and its laws and elections! I have studied more in the last decade about what the laws say and the Constitution allows specifically than I ever learned earlier in my life, but that is because our way of life has been threatened more from within this country than from without. The government has no say or role in health-care, and it is not to be taken over by the government on a mandatory basis, either! We, the People, are the Constitution, and we had better stand against this tide of socialism and tyranny by our government! As to the military, we swore an oath of allegiance to defend the United States (the country and People), and the Constitution, and very specifically to obey the orders of the President and/or Governor (as long as the order is legal by the UCMJ).
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
22 Sep 09
Hi Tanker, I went to Catholic school up until freshman year of high school. We had civics as early as fifth grade. In high school we talked about politics but not the Constitution...we touched on that only briefly when discussing elections. I home schooled my kids and included the Constitution in our discussions as early as third grade. I believe it is NOT taught deliberately as a way to keep the 'masses' uniformed and unable to make good decisions when election time roles around. If someone doesn't know their rights...how can they defend them?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Aug 09
If our elected officials make fun of and demean people who expect them (or their staffs) to actually read the bills they "support", how do we imagine they give a flying fig about reading the US Constitution. It is only when We the People put their feet to the proverbial fire that they bother acknowledging out existence, much less the Founding Fathers and our National Documents.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
14 Aug 09
And yet there are still those who support them. I knew that we had fallen from our lofty past...but just how far - I am only begining to see.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
12 Aug 09
I had to pass that test as well, along with a test of our State Constitution. If schools are not teaching it these days, it is simply because the schools want people to be ignorant of the Constitution and what it says.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
13 Aug 09
That is why I am encouraging EVERYONE to at least read it. It is easy to find on the net...along with discussions on the meaning of each section. Familiarize yourself...so you know what's being stolen from you...and Ignored by your elected officials. The general welfare...does not mean Congress gets to make up new stuff. It means within the powers of Congress...anything that promotes the general welfare (within those enumerated powers) can be decided on by Congress. The founding fathers did not mean for this to be an elastic document...just like the Constitution says NOTHING about separation of church and state, it does not say ANYTHING can be done for the general welfare of the people.